Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50351111

Points: 714

# Comments: 164

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50349276

Points: 303

# Comments: 139

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50346981

Points: 438

# Comments: 137

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50346849

Points: 332

# Comments: 75

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50344919

Points: 388

# Comments: 305

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50341462

Points: 585

# Comments: 181

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50341174

Points: 2903

# Comments: 875

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50340619

Points: 313

# Comments: 88

Here's a video of Dave from YC trying it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QdX1eObVYI

(Edit: you don't actually have to move your lips or even open your mouth for this to work! Since the RF can see inside your mouth the system can be fine tuned on "internal speech". This isn't the automatic tongue movements that occur when "thinking" words to yourself, but more like mouthing with your lips closed. It's a bit weird to do, but with practice, we have been able to get it down pretty well.)

Arnav and I were studying CS at Georgia Tech at the beginning of the year, with no experience in silent speech or sensing. We were both AI-native builders and power users of Wispr Flow. What bugged us was not being able to use these tools in the library (or an office) or in public. At Stanford’s TreeHacks in February, we decided to build the most technically ridiculous thing we could think of. We’d read about AlterEgo, a silent speech system out of MIT’s Media Lab, and wanted to recreate it in 36 hours. We built a crude prototype, sticking EMG electrodes onto my face:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mwhv5HZMz3UTevdrgwS5O7g2jWV...

We got it to kind of work at a letter level in a very janky way. It wasn’t good enough to win the hackathon, but convinced us to go all in. The first time I typed a sentence without anyone noticing, I felt the magic of the technology.

We quickly realized EMG (reading muscle electrical signals) wouldn’t work:

- Signal changes due to sweat

- Electrical interference

- Placement variability

- Most importantly, no one wants to stick electrodes onto their face!!

So we switched to RF and built the glasses you see now. They emit radio waves, similar to Bluetooth, that pass through your face. As they cross the tongue, lips and soft palate, they’re modulated by silent mouthing. We train foundation models on this data to decode these perturbations to text.

Despite prior academic research, getting this to work was a huge engineering challenge. First we built an extremely low noise RF sensing stack. Then we had to place antennas so their fields overlapped maximally with the articulators. Our first attempt on glasses failed completely, so we reverted to old habits and taped antennas on our face:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ks0dS0eZiTV9EqSFsyB_w5BBjpc...

Since taping antennas consistently in the same spot and angle was hard, we created this weird but effective head rig to hold them in place:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rhzNFpdDzr7oHk0isFY70dkoV4C...

This worked, but obviously wasn’t a product yet. So we worked deep in simulations to design glasses that could hold the antennas.

That evolved into our design now, with antennas embedded within the frames. Once we established there was a signal, the next hurdle was cross-user generalization. Everyone’s facial anatomy, and hence RF signal patterns, are vastly different. We tried algorithmic workarounds but realized the only lever was to massively scale pretraining data.

So that’s what we did. We set up booths in our office and paid people to read prompts wearing our glasses, to pretrain our models on. This produced a beautiful scaling curve, with errors falling quickly as we scaled our dataset and cross-user performance becoming genuinely compelling (as you see in the video above; Dave only had a short 20-sentence calibration).

We always heard about building things from first principles but never understood it before this. We tried tackling it top down but completely failed. Only when we broke each component (the antenna, electronics, ML) down to its fundamentals to understand and optimize it did we get it to work really well.

Over the next few months we’re continuing R&D to turn our prototype glasses into the slick product on our website and ship in Q1 2027. We’re also scaling up our dataset to improve performance on edge cases.

For anyone who loves voice dictation but hates using it around people, we’ve opened preorders for our first batch of 500 units, with a $200 discount off the final price. Allocation is running out quickly, so get yours at https://subvocal.co/preorder!

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50340088

Points: 797

# Comments: 372

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50339494

Points: 343

# Comments: 266

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50339397

Points: 464

# Comments: 445

Works best on desktop, but I tried to make it usable on mobile too. The initial load can take a while. It's based on several open datasets, including:

- OpenStreetMap (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=6/52.02/19.14) - buildings, streets, sidewalks, tram tracks, etc

- GUGiK / Geoportal (https://www.geoportal.gov.pl/) - LiDAR for building heights and trees, aerial imagery for colours

- Warsaw's city tree database (https://mapa.um.warszawa.pl/) - individual tree species, used for seasonal foliage

Open-source (https://github.com/stared/warsaw-vibe-voxel), so feel invited to (re)use it as you wish!

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50339221

Points: 311

# Comments: 52

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50337608

Points: 1588

# Comments: 660

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50336518

Points: 638

# Comments: 148

https://www.irishtimes.com/technology/data-security/2026/11/...

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50335615

Points: 407

# Comments: 456

I scraped all mentions of wikipedia on hackernews and ranked them, and turn them into a scrollable feed to make it a bit more easy to digest / interact with. You can see where people submitted the articles and where people mentioned it in comments.

The top shows the most frequently linked articles.

Random is random but slightly weighted towards the more frequently linked articles (a little bit like Wikipedia actually).

Rising is ranked towards the past 12 months.

The entire site is served only through the frontend -- I'll add more features if people enjoy this!

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50333339

Points: 339

# Comments: 103

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50331957

Points: 332

# Comments: 134

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50331402

Points: 518

# Comments: 314

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50330939

Points: 349

# Comments: 214

I have heard good things about Apple TV as a better alternative to most smart TV native apps. Would some TV’s pair better with this than others for privacy? I don’t want the TV doing anything other than being the display for Apple TV.

I am curious what success others have had.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50328896

Points: 718

# Comments: 858