This pretty much describes _everything_ in Windows in the last 15 years.

Of course. Emacs has been my stable editor over many years, handling many languages that came along, surviving many other IDEs that came and gone (the latest being the Cursor sold out).

There're always new enhancements in Emacs, from multiple-cursor editing years ago, to LSP and tree sitter in recent years. Currently I just got into the vertico/marginalia/consult/embark combo packages. Embark with its context based actions seriously is an amazing underrated package.

Also claude-code-ide.el. try these

Being a co-maintainer, I'm a bit biased, but I think you should try Ghostel (https://github.com/dakra/ghostel) if you aren't already. And if you are, you should report bugs so we can fix them :)

1.Memorizing how to use it has a big learning curve.

2.Wrist pain from pressing button combinations all the time.

Otherwise plenty of people still use it and it's great. Just hard to pick up for new users.

For a very long time, the spec did not say it's illegal. In fact, RFC 2616 (that has been defining the HTTP/1.1 for 15 years) says that

                                   A message-body MUST NOT be included in
    a request if the specification of the request method (section 5.1.1)
    does not allow sending an entity-body in requests. A server SHOULD
    read and forward a message-body on any request; if the request method
    does not include defined semantics for an entity-body, then the
    message-body SHOULD be ignored when handling the request.

I don't think any of those things are true.

This is about what I observe. I had a utility based on `scapy`; there were no obviously bad ideas in the python source, but porting the work loop into a cpython extension module yielded a 500x speedup.

The study you mention say the people were already in an arousal state (that they had to induce themselves). It's very different from seeing images that you may simply ignore, evaluate differently, etc.

Also, there is the bias that if people are looking for such images (because they really want them), they are probably more willing to drop recommended practices, and hence make irrational moves. So irrationality doesn't come from seeing the images at the first place, but from their willingness to find / see such images.

Okay but presumeably humans adapt to the level of "sexuality" around them to some degree (like they do nearly every other stimulus), because otherwise you could show less prude cultures having lower ability to do "rational thought".

Nudity is normal all over the world and yet people seem to function just fine. What constitutes content that justifies sexual arousal is socially constructed!

echo "Python sucks, use something else when you can" >> ~/CLAUDE.md

Python was cool in 2005 in academia IT, all the rage in startup 2012. These days...

Unfortunately this will just involve said teams running their patches over AI first before they're put in the main branch. For businesses it will probably be fine, but would get very expensive for open source projects.

It's got the right combinations of inexperience, cluelessness, panic, expectations that Westerners are rich, and hopes of others being willing to fix their mistake.

This is a REALLY bold assumption you’re making here, and frankly until we’ve tried it I don’t think you can argue that it has no positive effect to put tons of books in every small town everywhere.

As I noted, it's a pain for me to have to drive down to DC to get access to a book which _used_ to be in the local library system, but isn't anymore, or to purchase my own copy (which wasn't previously necessary).