<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: 0verkilled</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=0verkilled</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 19:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=0verkilled" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0verkilled in "RISC-V Is Sloooow"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unrelated to the post's point but: Why does x86 build faster than x86_64? Presumably they used the same exact hardware, or at least the exact same number of cores and memory, yet the build time is more than 10% faster in x86. Is there some sort of overhead for x86_64 that I'm not seeing?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 16:34:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47337797</link><dc:creator>0verkilled</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47337797</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47337797</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0verkilled in "Microfeatures I love in blogs and personal websites"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>+1 on finding progress bars distracting. I personally feel like they also "hurry" you into reading faster. If I see a progress bar, my first instinct is to try to finish as quickly as possible, even if that means a poorer understanding of the text.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:23:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40778596</link><dc:creator>0verkilled</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40778596</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40778596</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0verkilled in "Tired of Dating Apps, Some Turn to Google Docs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The top 80 percent of women compete for the top 20 percent of men on dating apps<p>I've seen this type of statement repeated many times, and respectfully I think it's a very broad and oversimplified reduction of such a complex topic.<p>The source you provided is extremely limited (afaict it's a sample size of 27 in a single app, a very circular definition of attractiveness, obviously not peer reviewed, etc.), but I think even a more reputable source would still have very limited results due to the huge scope of online dating and the highly subjective impressions involved.<p>I do agree that online dating appears to be superficial and not a great tool for finding meaningful relationships, but I've found that a lot of the discourse surrounding it (regular dating too) seems more based on collective insecurities than solid research.<p>Maybe there are differences in dating habits that favor some group over another, but a lot of the things I've seen tend to go to towards the idea of female hypergamy (a pillar of 'redpilled' incel ideology) without a lot to back it up.<p>I'm not saying that this particular study is necessarily wrong, but I'm wary of the biases, unconscious beliefs and assumptions that are usually carried when 'facts' like these are taken at face value.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 16:20:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36973001</link><dc:creator>0verkilled</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36973001</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36973001</guid></item></channel></rss>