<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: 0xDEAFBEAD</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=0xDEAFBEAD</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 15:13:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=0xDEAFBEAD" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "The cult of vibe coding is dogfooding run amok"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>AI hasn't observably reduced the quality of software I use everyday in a way that is meaningfully separable from normal incidents in the past.<p>I have noticed a spike in web apps exhibiting random failures and glitchy behavior over the past few months.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 22:33:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668242</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668242</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668242</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Ars Technica fires reporter after AI controversy involving fabricated quotes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I could equally well ask why putting your best foot forward would be considered excessive self-promotion.  Consider the example of contacting a journalist.  Why would it be a huge no-no?  Why can't the journalist just treat it as any other lead?  Skim the email, if they're not interested, ignore or delete.  That's not a significant burden.  If they <i>are</i> interested, such emails actually <i>help</i> the journalist do their job, by providing ideas for stories.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:09:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47241079</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47241079</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47241079</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Ars Technica fires reporter after AI controversy involving fabricated quotes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>The US mentality might be different, but at least having grown up and living in Germany, such an annoying hustler who wants to use some journalist as a marketing influencer for his private project is a huge no-no. In other words: it is a very reasonable decision (perhaps even the only right one) for any journalist to fob off such a hustler.<p>Yeah there seems to be a thing where in the US, what's seen as "selling yourself" or "putting your best foot forward" is considered excessive self-promotion / tall poppy behavior in other cultures.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 13:12:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47231797</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47231797</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47231797</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Show HN: Govbase – Follow a bill from source text to news bias to social posts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>shows who it impacts by demographic group.<p>Why do we need to bake this zero-sum mentality into everything?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 12:29:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47231383</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47231383</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47231383</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Statement from Dario Amodei on our discussions with the Department of War"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Believe it or not Steve Bannon is quite concerned about AI development:<p>>Over on Steve Bannon's show, War Room -- the influential podcast that's emerged as the tip of the spear of the MAGA movement -- Trump's longtime ally unloaded on the efforts behind accelerating AI, calling it likely "the most dangerous technology in the history of mankind."<p>>...<p>>"You have more restrictions on starting a nail salon on Capitol Hill or to have your hair braided, then you have on the most dangerous technologies in the history of mankind," Bannon told his listeners.<p><a href="https://abcnews.com/US/inside-magas-growing-fight-stop-trumps-ai-revolution/story?id=127824351" rel="nofollow">https://abcnews.com/US/inside-magas-growing-fight-stop-trump...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 03:09:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47175941</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47175941</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47175941</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Spain’s LaLiga has blocked access to freedom.gov"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When the left is censoring more (as was true in the run-up to Trump's election), of course a free speech organization will be opposing left-wing censorship more frequently.<p>Censorship doesn't help your team, just the opposite.  <a href="https://www.thefire.org/news/blogs/eternally-radical-idea/would-censorship-have-stopped-rise-nazis-part-16-answers" rel="nofollow">https://www.thefire.org/news/blogs/eternally-radical-idea/wo...</a><p>Trump's election was a reaction to left-wing cancel culture.  If people had listened to FIRE, and refuted bad ideas instead of censoring them, maybe Trump wouldn't have been elected: <a href="https://qr.ae/pYCVXO" rel="nofollow">https://qr.ae/pYCVXO</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 16:25:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124491</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124491</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124491</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Spain’s LaLiga has blocked access to freedom.gov"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The parent comment in question has essentially zero in the way of supporting evidence.  The author's first claim happened to be verifiable.  I attempted to verify it, and it was pretty clearly false.<p>What's asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124165</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124165</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124165</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Spain’s LaLiga has blocked access to freedom.gov"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>Nearly every example of his critique is of the UK<p>I just used a word count tool to sanity-check this claim.  It said there are 1061 words about the UK and 1684 words about non-UK countries.<p>You appear to be fibbing about easy-to-check facts.  Anyone who trusts you on your harder-to-verify claims is a fool.<p>There seems to be a bit of a pattern I've noticed with Europeans on HN.  They criticize the US constantly, yet flip out <i>instantly</i> when their countries are criticized, to the point of reflexively lying about stuff which is easily checkable.<p>I can <i>sorta</i> understand lying about claims which are hard to verify. It's distasteful, but I can understand why a <i>certain</i> type of person would do it.  But, why lie about stuff which takes under 60 seconds to check?  What are you trying to accomplish?<p>BTW, I hope you aren't in Germany.  It's a crime to insult someone or spread malicious gossip online in Germany.  Your usage of "drivel" might be considered an insult which could get your phone confiscated: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bMzFDpfDwc#t=3m" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-bMzFDpfDwc#t=3m</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124125</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124125</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47124125</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Spain’s LaLiga has blocked access to freedom.gov"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"The situation for free speech in Europe is even worse than I thought"<p><a href="https://eternallyradicalidea.com/p/the-situation-for-free-speech-in" rel="nofollow">https://eternallyradicalidea.com/p/the-situation-for-free-sp...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 01:31:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47116936</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47116936</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47116936</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sure, so that suggests that these so-called "independent nonpartisan panels" are likely to fail immediately as well.  It illustrates the principle that good intentions are no match for incentives.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 15:47:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101839</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101839</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101839</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Facebook is cooked"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What's more, the United States has some of the highest reading test scores in the world: <a href="https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/academic-performance?subject=reading&sex=both" rel="nofollow">https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/academic-performance?subj...</a><p>This entire planet is full of idiots</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 15:10:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101531</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101531</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101531</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>OK, so what criteria would you specify?<p>BTW, the original intent of the Electoral College in the United States was pretty similar to this.  Electors were supposed to be independent actors exercising their independent judgement in selection of the president.  It wasn't sustainable for long.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 14:51:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101366</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101366</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101366</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Facebook is cooked"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>People will engage with and promote that stuff even without a recommendation algorithm.  Lots of subreddits are full of ragebait if you look at the most-upvoted posts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 14:35:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101214</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101214</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47101214</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If creation of independent nonpartisan panels is so easy, why not just have such a panel govern the entire country?<p>Any country which struggles to appoint justices in a nonpartisan way will also struggle to assemble a panel in a nonpartisan way, I think.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:58:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47100909</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47100909</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47100909</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>roughly a couple of academics who've taught this stuff, a couple of real on-the-ground attorneys who've argued before this court<p>How are these members of the committee chosen then?  Seems like you're just moving the problem around, if choice of committee member is also subject to partisan incentives.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:56:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47100893</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47100893</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47100893</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>There has most certainly been a major decline in values over time that corresponds quite strongly with the rise in the perceived importance of wealth.<p>Are you sure that people in the past viewed wealth as less important?  If anything, the 1960s hippie movement would represent a shift <i>away</i> from a cultural emphasis on wealth, no?<p>I would suggest that internet commenter nihilism and politician nihilism form a self-reinforcing spiral.  If commenters will take a nihilistic view of your actions no matter what you do, you might as well secure the bag.  And if politicians are always securing the bag, you might as well write nihilistic internet comments about them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 09:02:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098874</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098874</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098874</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But parties typically have to compromise with other parties in their coalition, so it would seem to amount to the same thing (compromise is required to pass legislation)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:38:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098735</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098735</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098735</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Karl Popper would like a word<p>"In fact, [proportional representation] robs him of personal responsibility; it makes of him a voting machine rather than a thinking and feeling person. In my view, this is by itself a sufficient argument against proportional representation. For what we need in politics are individuals who can judge on their own and who are prepared to carry personal responsibility."<p><a href="https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2016/01/31/from-the-archives-the-open-society-and-its-enemies-revisited" rel="nofollow">https://www.economist.com/democracy-in-america/2016/01/31/fr...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:36:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098726</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098726</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098726</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Trump's global tariffs struck down by US Supreme Court"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How would you suggest selecting jurists in a way that doesn't introduce partisan incentives?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 08:31:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098701</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098701</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47098701</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xDEAFBEAD in "Europe's $24T Breakup with Visa and Mastercard Has Begun"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>"Consumption" figures are also misleading.<p>I don't see why they would be, generally speaking.<p>"it’s very difficult to look at a country where the typical person lives in a larger house, is more likely to own a car, eats more meat, and uses more electricity than people in other rich countries, and to conclude that this is “a poor society”."
<a href="https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/no-the-us-is-not-a-poor-society-with" rel="nofollow">https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/no-the-us-is-not-a-poor-societ...</a><p>>In monetary terms, Americans consume more health services than anyone else, yet have fallen behind in life expectancy<p>US life expectancy has little to do with our healthcare system.  See <a href="https://xcancel.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1641799742228144130#m" rel="nofollow">https://xcancel.com/jburnmurdoch/status/1641799742228144130#...</a><p>>The prosperity of the average worker did not begin to stagnate when NATO was formed, but indeed decades later<p>My claim is simply that NATO is not key to our prosperity.  Post-NATO stagnation, insofar as it exists, is <i>quite</i> compatible with that claim.<p>>Switzerland is entirely surrounded by the EU, and its economic prosperity depends on access to the European Common Market.<p>None of the objections in this paragraph would apply to a more geopolitically neutral US.  The US economy is large and relatively self-sufficient.  Imports and exports are a relatively small fraction of our GDP.<p>>nuclear missiles Russians tried to set up on Cuba<p>...after we set up missiles in Turkey...<p>The Cuban missile crisis demonstrates the danger of American belligerence, and the importance of us being more peaceful, less paranoid, and more neutral.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 17:16:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46991619</link><dc:creator>0xDEAFBEAD</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46991619</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46991619</guid></item></channel></rss>