<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: 0xqlive</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=0xqlive</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 01:07:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=0xqlive" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 0xqlive in "Show HN: I built an OS that is pure AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The WASM sandbox + microkernel architecture is the right foundation for agent isolation, but it surfaces a problem that most agent systems don't address until it's too late: if every agent is ephemeral and generated on demand, your audit story is basically nonexistent. An agent crashes, does something unexpected, produces wrong output — and you have no record of what it was running, what context it had, or why it made the decisions it did.<p>With traditional software you at least have a binary you can inspect. Here the "program" is a generated Rust module that may never exist again in the same form. That's a genuinely hard problem for any use case where you need to reproduce or explain behavior after the fact.<p>The community agent store helps for sharing, but it also raises the question: when a downloaded agent does something wrong, who's responsible and how do you trace it? This feels like the unsexy infrastructure problem that'll define whether Pneuma can be trusted for anything beyond personal use.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2026 16:23:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640461</link><dc:creator>0xqlive</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640461</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47640461</guid></item></channel></rss>