The truth, as always, is in between. There’s loads of people using it for useful things, learning, automation and getting good results. But it’s also wrong enough that you need to deploy it carefully sometimes.

Don’t worry about either group. Keep objective and use AI where it helps and do it yourself where you are better. That’s all.

Unless you work in some highly specialised field maybe.

I’ve tried Gemini (paid) in the past with openscad and then designed the same object myself and I was 10 times faster

But the moto has always lacked any aspiration about how they should do good or make the world better. “Don’t be evil”. Who thinks they are being evil? No one.

Do you going around telling people how virtuous you are? No, good people just try and be good.

The slogan was a red flag right from the start.

But I think what you’ll see is people making sure the model they use can just be plugged into their workflow.

I used to use Gemini-cli until they did a Google and cancelled it in favour of anti-gravity.

That was my fault. Fool me the 10th time shame on me.

So I picked more open source offerings that I can use with any model. Once the other models are good enough, I just need to jump ship.

How do you supposed this will happen? Through destruction of evidence or the invention of a Time Machine to warn his younger self?

Yes, things will have to change. That’s the idea.

I always got garbage even if it suggested things I wanted to watch too.

The best way is to disable suggestions completely and then just make a note of your favourite channels. That way you get a completely blank landing page and are forced to search out exactly what you want every time.

I think the GP is alluding to understanding the fundamental way a thing works.