<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: 3192987</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=3192987</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 06:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=3192987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 3192987 in "Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And human salaries for those who worked on the prover harness etc. which isn't just standard Fable.<p>It also uses Prove2Me, which uses a graph like previous automated theorem provers. A fact that LLM hawks have categorically denied here before, with opposition naturally flagged.<p>Now they have it in writing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 19:51:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569396</link><dc:creator>3192987</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569396</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569396</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 3192987 in "Formalizing Fermat's Last Theorem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We have a significant case split here:<p>A human mathematician writes a Lean proof:<p>- Unlikely that the mathematician would cheat with Lean bugs or even know how to find one. Trust increases.<p>An AI writes a Lean proof:<p>- AIs have been "ambitious" in their goals in the past and do know how to find Lean bugs and exploit them. Trust decreases.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 19:44:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569328</link><dc:creator>3192987</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569328</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49569328</guid></item></channel></rss>