"factual (ai) Weather, traffic, and personal urgency are the only significant variables that could tilt the decision toward driving."

My gut feeling is that if this could be done, it would be a core part of one of the model provider's output.

Dually turning the brand toxic to your core customers, and having a bonfire of a strategy around products.

"In philosophy and psychology of cognition, the term "bullshit" is sometimes used to specifically refer to statements produced without particular concern for truth, clarity, or meaning, distinguishing "bullshit" from a deliberate, manipulative lie intended to subvert the truth" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47697032

Points: 3

# Comments: 1

https://www.marinetraffic.com/en/p/terms

For Anthropic it's "we own the big scary models, the AI security space, but it's ok we're responsible"

For the partners it's "we're the Big Boys here and will look after your enterprise needs"

None of it needs any more than anecdata and some nice, pre-approved, quotes.

Every organisation does it.

Did the LLM suggest using some pre-existing standard like MBTiles for the tiles?

As it stands this is just a marketing programme for all involved.

>if they do not like those, they should hand off the project to a quoarum of >responsible maintainers and demote themselves to just a contributor.

The most responsible thing to do is to release it under an OSS license and let whoever, yes - including you, fork and maintain their own copy if it's that important.

Even if they did sign the code, What's stopping them slipping some crypto link in. And do they also need to check all the transitive depdencies in their code?