<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: 542458</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=542458</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 08:31:45 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=542458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Leaked financial docs show OpenAI is losing billions of dollars a year"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I feel like I have a different $20 plan than everyone else. I have no problem hitting my 5 hour and weekly limits. Don’t get me wrong, it’s a great deal compared to API pricing, but it’s a far cry from “unlimited”.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 23:20:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48578383</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48578383</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48578383</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Curl will not accept vulnerability reports during July 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> There needs to be a time when you are completely undisturbed and disconnected. If you are disturbed by work you will think about work while you answer and maybe even after that. That's not good.<p>IMO this is not a universal truth - I’m sure some people need that level of disconnection, but I don't find I'm one of them. I generally like my job, and don't find that forcing myself to disconnect does me any particular mental good. But other people report needing that separation, and that's fine! I don't think there needs to be a one-size-fits-all answer here.<p>I do agree with your bus factor argument though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 13:25:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48540926</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48540926</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48540926</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Curl will not accept vulnerability reports during July 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think my POV on this is a bit different than what others are expressing… I don’t mind answering the occasional email while on vacation, but I view it as a fair trade - as long as the company doesn’t mind me handling the occasional personal obligation during work hours I don’t mind handling the occasional work obligation during personal hours. If the company wants to be strict about clock in/out hours or taking PTO for every 30 minute errand or the work trends in a way that routinely exceeds 40 hours per week total then I’ll stop doing work “off the clock”, but so long as they’re willing to be reasonable I’m willing to be reasonable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 11:31:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48539776</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48539776</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48539776</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Show HN: Script to bulk delete Claude chats from the web UI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's 100 lines of unobfuscated js. If you're worried just read it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:16:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48505999</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48505999</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48505999</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Shall we play a game? – LLMs use tactical nukes in 95% of simulations"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> writhing knife<p>Minor/pedantic, but it’s “riving knife”: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riving_knife" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riving_knife</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:15:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497151</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497151</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497151</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "xAI is looking more like a datacentre REIT than a frontier lab"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is there anything to read on how the economics of an orbital datacenter make any sense? Because I don't really see how blasting a server into space solves any of the typical issues associated with datacentres beyond easier access to solar.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 21:24:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48452341</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48452341</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48452341</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "The solution might be cancelling my AI subscription"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s how I use it. I might be working on two or three features at a time (iterating, iterating, iterating…), but they’re all scoped and of user value; I don’t feel that I’m just off chasing rabbits.<p>But I’m also one of those people for whom the “fun” was always solving human problems rather than solving computer problems. I can see how if you are in the latter category AI has already sucked out a lot of joy <i>and</i> how rapidly project switching could be the least-unfun option.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 15:25:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346454</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346454</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346454</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "OpenRouter raises $113M Series B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A library with a bunch of different providers doesn’t solve the payment/billing problem (which is one of the main openrouter benefits). IMO being able to buy credits and not have them locked to one provider is worth the 5% to me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 23:16:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341517</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341517</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341517</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "The dead economy theory"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>From your Wikipedia link:<p>> Demands: […] Government to ensure at least 50% profit over their overall cost of production.<p>They demanded 50% guaranteed annual RoR on all farming activities? That’s a wild demand.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 21:01:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48329211</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48329211</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48329211</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Nendo's Wonderful Toru, an Electric Kettle for Alessi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They're different sizes, it's in the description and it's also described under "More info" > "Capacity (cl)". I'm not seeing the "What is the capacity..." button you mentioned.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 14:14:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309242</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309242</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309242</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Nendo's Wonderful Toru, an Electric Kettle for Alessi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I love that even something as well-trodden as a kettle design can still be refined further. My main skepticism is whether this works well when the kettle isn't close to full - the image of it pouring implies a nearly-full kettle, but does the angle become awkward when it's closer to empty? Hard to know without actually holding one.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 14:01:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309090</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309090</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48309090</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Don't put aria-label on generic elements like divs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While web accessibility is important and something we <i>should</i> be investing in, I do feel that the vendors of accessibility tools are somewhat to blame here in how friggin difficult it is to actually make something accessible. Quirks and features are wildly inconsistent across tools, and feature uptake is much slower than it should be. For example, creating an accessible dialog shouldn’t be a multi-page essay to explain, it should just be “use the <dialog> element.” - but the a11y tools are so inconsistent that you can’t just do the standards compliant thing. And don’t get me started on roving tabindex techniques (for things like data tables), which are at best an ugly hack that the entire industry has collectively decided “eh, it’s good enough”.<p>Even what's described in the article basically boils down to "You can label things, but not generic things (for some reason?), unless that generic thing is a <section> or has a popover attr in which case it magically works." And this isn't even one of the "hard" accessibility things!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 12:19:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278739</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278739</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278739</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Launch HN: Chert (YC P26) – Twilio for iMessage"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It looks like in iMessage for business, the phone’s user’s outbound messages show as dark grey (as opposed to normal iMessage and SMS/RCS which show outbound messages as blue and green respectively). I assume this is supposed to communicate that you’re talking to a different sort of entity, not a normal person on a phone.<p>Personally I don’t see why you’d care. My business isn’t trying to pretend to be a normal person using a phone, so why would it matter?<p><a href="https://www.apple.com/ios/business-chat/" rel="nofollow">https://www.apple.com/ios/business-chat/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 19:55:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270932</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Eric Schmidt speech about AI booed during graduation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It is only spectacular because of the free tiers<p>The thesis under discussion is "most people hate AI", not "most people will pay for AI". People who hate AI won't sign up to use the tools if they're free or paid QED AI service signups regardless of paid status are useful datapoints for "how many people don't hate AI".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 17:18:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182485</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182485</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48182485</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Eric Schmidt speech about AI booed during graduation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You could use ChatGPT/anthropic/etc signups as your proxy if you wanted, and those show similarly spectacular trajectories.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 12:59:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179166</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179166</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48179166</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "AI subscriptions are a ticking time bomb for enterprise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve said this before on HN, but there are two things that make me optimistic that we won’t see a big rug pull where price-to-capability ratio skyrockets relative to today:<p>* People keep finding ways of cramming more intelligence into smaller models, meaning that a given hardware spec delivers more model capability over time. I remember not that long ago when cutting edge 70B parameter models could <i>kinda-sorta-sometimes</i> write code that worked. Versus today, when Qwen 27BA3B (1/23 of the active parameters!) is actually *fun* to vibe code with in a good harness. It’s not opus smart, but the point is you don’t need a trillion parameters to do useful things.<p>* Hardware will continue to improve and supply will catch up to demand, meaning that a dollar will deliver more hardware spec over time. Right now the industry is massively supply constrained, but I don’t see any reason that has to continue forever. Every vendor knows that memory quality and memory bandwidth and the new metrics of note, and I expect to start seeing products that reflect that in a few years.<p>I hope that one day we’ll look back on the current model of “accessing AI through provider APIs” the same way we now look back on “everyone connecting to the company mainframe.”</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 12:52:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168492</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168492</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168492</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Bitwarden scrubs 'Always free' and 'Inclusion' values from its site"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As much as I hate the changes Bitwarden is making, I’m kinda with them on not adding official vaultwarden support. Having to support multiple backends (some of which you don’t control!) with your frontend makes everything massively more complicated.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 13:33:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148393</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148393</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148393</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Bitwarden scrubs 'Always free' and 'Inclusion' values from its site"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Bitwarden is open-source though? This is about the hosted version of it, which has a free tier. But you can run the same software on your server at home if you want, for free.<p>(That said, I am also concerned about the direction Bitwarden is taking. I just think this shows that even OSS projects can have direction/rugpull issues.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 13:27:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148321</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148321</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48148321</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Rars: a Rust RAR implementation, mostly written by LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t believe any of the extant open source rar implementations cover the range of features and versions OP’s does. I think that’s the point - OP’s isn’t the cleanest or fastest implementation, but it is the most broad open source version available.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:57:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129812</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48129812</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 542458 in "Operation: Epic Furious"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>People independently make statues all the time, including some very famous and expensive ones such as <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charging_Bull" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charging_Bull</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 17:16:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124732</link><dc:creator>542458</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124732</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48124732</guid></item></channel></rss>