<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: 634636346</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=634636346</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=634636346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Empires of the Steppes: The Nomadic Tribes Who Shaped Civilisation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fitting that this was posted on Columbus Day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 05:14:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37828731</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37828731</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37828731</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Apple Pay Later: What Are the Crazy Ones Up To?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Cathie Wood’s Ark ETF seems to find the payments margin opportunity, and the gang to get it there. In its Big Ideas 2023 paper, Ark points out that there are 9 steps between Buyer and Seller in a consumer payment transaction, sucking intermediary fees of roughly 2.8% of the value of the purchase. Ark believes enormous money is to be made if the steps between Buyer and Seller would be reduced from 9 to 3 (removing card networks, issuers, and acquirers, for the most part), thereby reducing the expense from 1.64% to 0.21% of the value of the transaction (leaving a massive 2.60% ‘take rate’ for its horse). If you’re looking for crazy, Cathie Wood’s group is a hot mess full of them.<p>Most of that "take rate" goes to the issuing bank, which returns it to the customer in the form of rewards, which can often be redeemed for cash, and a number of issuers now offer generic 2% cashback cards. There's also the added benefit of fraud protection (and the ability to charge-back, as a last resort). Anyone using Cash App or similar in lieu of a credit card, I just assume is financially illiterate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Aug 2023 18:40:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37275643</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37275643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37275643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Add an AI Code Copilot to your product using GPT-4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> However, OpenAI pinky promises they don't use API data for anything, like training. Maybe that makes you feel a bit safer, although probably it shouldn't.<p>It doesn't. I don't trust OpenAI or Sama. Frankly, I'm even hesitant to use VSCode now, even with its customizable privacy/telemetry settings (though I can at least limit its network access).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37004865</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37004865</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37004865</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Add an AI Code Copilot to your product using GPT-4"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Doesn't this give OpenAI access to your source code?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 17:06:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37002751</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37002751</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37002751</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "The Coming Enshittification of Public Libraries"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The pearl-clutching over "book banning" is ridiculous. It's parents not wanting schools exposing their children (i.e., minors) to certain materials the parents think is inappropriate. And these supposedly "banned" books are still readily available to adults from Amazon, B&N, and (usually) regular libraries. Why is this such a big deal?<p>Meanwhile, you now have censorship at the <i>internet backbone level</i>, with ISPs arbitrarily, unilaterally deciding to stop routing traffic to <i>legal</i> websites, and there's been little outcry: <a href="https://twitter.com/IncogNetLLC/status/1685359845505957888" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://twitter.com/IncogNetLLC/status/1685359845505957888</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 16:01:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37001812</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37001812</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37001812</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Google Web Environment Integrity Is the New Microsoft Trusted Computing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not just hypocrisy. Many of the HNers railing against this are actually responsible, even if just indirectly, for it. Take Chrome (including Chromium) use, for example. Chrome has never been <i>that much</i> better (e.g. 2-3x) than FF. Maybe at its best, when it first debuted and V8 wowed everyone, it was 20-30% better--not enough to justify the investment a poweruser (who heavily customizes their browser) would have to make to jump ship, and not enough for anyone concerned about the open web. Yet I would guess most people here jumped ship at some point (probably when it was new and shinny and Google still paid lip service to "don't be evil"), and they've never looked back, despite FF having caught up and remaining competitive.<p>Asking people to not use Chrome isn't asking much, and yet people here can't even manage that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jul 2023 13:00:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36930746</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36930746</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36930746</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Tor’s shadowy reputation will only end if we all use it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> engage in illegal<p>Well then why haven't they been prosecuted?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 20:05:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36912554</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36912554</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36912554</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Tor’s shadowy reputation will only end if we all use it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wouldn't be surprised if the author, and a large segment of HNers agreeing with her, did a swift about-face when they realized that Tor also provides an end-run around the internet backbone black-holing of IPs that some Tier 1 ISPs did to KiwiFarms last year, during the height of the campaign to deplatform it. More people using Tor in general means more people having the means and know-how to evade censorship, and we can't have that, can we?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2023 14:20:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36907172</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36907172</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36907172</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Google Web Environment Integrity Is the New Microsoft Trusted Computing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder how many HNers angry about this are also some combination of 1) working for bigtech 2) using iOS/OSX/Android instead of Linux (yeah, I know Android is technically a Linux) 3) using Chrome/Safari instead of Firefox and 4) have endorsed, at least in the past, bigtech firms like Google and Cloudflare acting as arbiters of what is/is not acceptable content for the internet, and even whether it should be viewable by anyone at all.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 22:20:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36900923</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36900923</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36900923</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Google Web Environment Integrity Is the New Microsoft Trusted Computing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One of the devs is using the CoC to silence criticism, even CoC-based criticism: <a href="https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/issues/131">https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity/...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2023 11:45:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36892056</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36892056</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36892056</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "The removal of “noindex” from the Internet Archive, and associated risks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Like one of the commenters in that thread said, this sounds like they were using the noidex feature to use the IA as a personal <i>private</i> backup, and thus abusing it, and ruined it for everyone else. The IA is great as a personal <i>public</i> backup. (For example, I've deliberately submitted copies of certain OSS projects I've worked on to the Wayback Machine.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:55:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864236</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864236</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864236</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Important Coding Habits"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sorry, I wouldn't have been so harsh had I not suspected the entire blog was AI spam. Good luck with your back. (And please do at least some basic resistance training, even just once a week.)<p>> The text content of the blog is all hand-written by me, not AI, although I do use AI (Stability) to create the header images.<p>Well, you can't really fault people for suspecting you're using AI for other things too, can you? It's almost a form of gaslighting. You also apparently did an AI-generated podcast? (According to your profile.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2023 15:15:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36836122</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36836122</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36836122</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "What every IT person needs to know about OpenBSD (2021)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Theo isn't a "Code of Conduct" type of guy. Not a good fit. Though the license of the Rust compiler (MIT/Apache) does at least make it a possibility.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2023 15:09:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36836070</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36836070</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36836070</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Important Coding Habits"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I stand corrected. However, I still think he's using GPT to generate much of his content, and at most doing some post-hoc editing of it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2023 22:00:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36830386</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36830386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36830386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "FedNow Is Live"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thankfully, the site is no longer available via clearweb, so we can just take its characterization by its harshest critics at face value, rather than having to actually read it ourselves and make up our own minds.<p>However, I do find it strange that the site now only being available through Tor--and thus not showing up in Google search results or being easily browsable by "normies"--seems to have been enough to assuage the people spearheading its deplatforming, since Tor should pose little of an impediment to those capable and willing enough to IRL harass and SWAT people (the purported <i>real</i> reason KF exists). It's almost as if their real concern is people being able to google them and find a site that comprehensively documents their bad, and perhaps illegal, behavior.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2023 02:14:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36809251</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36809251</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36809251</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "FedNow Is Live"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are still almost 5k banks in the US. Unlike Zelle, if this opens to all of them, all you need is one bank.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 21:10:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36806791</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36806791</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36806791</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "FedNow Is Live"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>The reason the US government has a national debt is because that debt is owed to the Federal Reserve, which is a private bank that loans the US government money and that sets the US monetary policy.<p>I'm pretty sure every holder of US Treasuries (including me) is owed money by the US government.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 20:54:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36806619</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36806619</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36806619</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "FedNow Is Live"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It will be interesting to see how this affects "toxic," deplatformed, and to some degree debanked (at least from PayPal and CC processors) entities, like the KiwiFarms. While this page is somewhat vague about the private/public status of the Fed: <a href="https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm</a><p>it seems pretty well established that federally chartered corporations, like the USPS and Amtrak (e.g., <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebron_v._National_Railroad_Passenger_Corporation" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebron_v._National_Railroad_Pa...</a>), are bound by the first amendment, so theoretically the Fed should be as well.<p>That means the usual "it's a private corporation!" defense of corporate censorship is probably off the table.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 20:07:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36805998</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36805998</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36805998</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Kevin Mitnick has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I upvoted you, for what it's worth. People here really are relentless with the downvoting and flagging.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 15:20:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36801810</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36801810</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36801810</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 634636346 in "Numbers without which it's impossible to talk about weight loss"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The [rapidly diminishing] inverse correlation between veganism and obesity would seem to reject this, but I think that can be easily and entirely explained<p>It's easily and entirely explained by fiber. Fiber, through gastric distension, is, along with protein, the primary driver of satiation. There are other factors too, like the fact that they eat more whole, unprocessed foods, which are harder for the body to digest (i.e., require more energy.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 17:24:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36790002</link><dc:creator>634636346</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36790002</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36790002</guid></item></channel></rss>