<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: 7589447636</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=7589447636</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 09:39:32 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=7589447636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 7589447636 in "The hidden cost of AI coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How long until it becomes the rule because of some arbitrary "productivity" metric? Sure, you may not be <i>forced</i> to use it, but you'll be fire for being "unproductive".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:26:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43783927</link><dc:creator>7589447636</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43783927</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43783927</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 7589447636 in "The hidden cost of AI coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Now, I wonder if I am just totally unable to write/refine good prompts for the LLM (as it works for smaller samples, I hope I am not too far off) or what could explain the huge discrepancy of experience.<p>Programming language / stack plays plays a big role, I presume.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:21:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43783866</link><dc:creator>7589447636</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43783866</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43783866</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 7589447636 in "The hidden cost of AI coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It is a stubborn refusal to see that one could be programming something much more sophisticated if they could use these iteration loops efficiently<p>Programming something more sophisticated with AI? AI is pretty much useless if you're doing anything somewhat novel. What it excels at is vomiting code that has already been written a million times so you can build yet another Electron cross-platform app.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:12:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43783789</link><dc:creator>7589447636</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43783789</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43783789</guid></item></channel></rss>