<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: 8organicbits</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=8organicbits</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 17:23:18 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=8organicbits" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "The Website Specification"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If someone enters a username that doesn't exist in the system then you randomly prompt for password or alternate method, so it looks like an account may exist.<p>Username enumeration isn't usually considered a vulnerability, but it does make other attacks, like credential stuffing, easier. I.E. you can focus attack resources on usernames that have active accounts.<p>It's very low on my list of concerns though, usually there's much worse problems when I pentest.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 16:14:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346904</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346904</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48346904</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "Parallel Reconstruction of Lawful TLS Wiretapping"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have it partially right. The extensions are not yet mandatory.<p><a href="https://www.feistyduck.com/newsletter/issue_137_acme_caa__extensions_to_become_mandatory" rel="nofollow">https://www.feistyduck.com/newsletter/issue_137_acme_caa__ex...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 00:12:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341844</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341844</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341844</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "Parallel Reconstruction of Lawful TLS Wiretapping"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One suggestion for anyone concerned about this weakness. You can use the CAA record to pin the domain to a specific certificate authority, issuance method, and account. This is imperfect, as CAA record validation (edit: of CAA extensions) is not mandatory yet. But by March 2027 all the CAs a supposed to have support.<p>Sprinkle some DNSSEC on the CAA record too, if you'd like.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 23:16:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341527</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Acme CAA Extensions to Become Mandatory]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.feistyduck.com/newsletter/issue_137_acme_caa__extensions_to_become_mandatory">https://www.feistyduck.com/newsletter/issue_137_acme_caa__extensions_to_become_mandatory</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317275">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317275</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:07:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.feistyduck.com/newsletter/issue_137_acme_caa__extensions_to_become_mandatory</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317275</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317275</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "You can issue a 15-year SSL certificate today. Why almost nobody does"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cloudflare origin CA is a private CA, so the CABF doesn't apply.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 02:26:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243950</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243950</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243950</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Authoritative DNS over encrypted transport at OARC 45]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.apnic.net/2026/05/20/authoritative-dns-over-encrypted-transport-at-oarc-45/">https://blog.apnic.net/2026/05/20/authoritative-dns-over-encrypted-transport-at-oarc-45/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243876">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243876</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 02:12:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.apnic.net/2026/05/20/authoritative-dns-over-encrypted-transport-at-oarc-45/</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243876</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48243876</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[A "Photonic" Guitar]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.dallasnews.com/arts-entertainment/visual-arts/2025/08/01/science-or-art-this-former-ut-dallas-physicists-work-blurs-the-line/">https://www.dallasnews.com/arts-entertainment/visual-arts/2025/08/01/science-or-art-this-former-ut-dallas-physicists-work-blurs-the-line/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172914">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172914</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 20:27:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.dallasnews.com/arts-entertainment/visual-arts/2025/08/01/science-or-art-this-former-ut-dallas-physicists-work-blurs-the-line/</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172914</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48172914</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "New arXiv policy: 1-year ban for hallucinated references"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If the goal is to review every citation fully with 100% accuracy, then, sure, exhaustive human review is needed. But I suspect human review of a random sample would add value, catching some fraud, missing others, but having zero false positives (or as close to zero as human review can get).<p>An LLM could replace the random sampling. It doesn't need to be particularly good for the approach to provide value. I would worry about LLM bias though.<p>Another thing to consider is that readers can detect fake citations after publication, report to arXiv, and the author gets banned.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 12:08:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147607</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147607</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147607</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "Leaving GitHub for Forgejo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How much utilization do you have? For low scale, it's hard to beat GitHub Actions as they offer free runners for public repos and include a bunch of free hours for private repos.<p>Once you start paying for it, GitHub Actions runners are very expensive. I've used both Jenkins and GitLab before to self-host CI/CD, and you save so much using on-demand (or at higher scale, reserved) cloud instances. I do freelance DevOps work and I've helped clients with these sorts of challenges.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123186</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123186</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48123186</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "Show HN: An index of indie web/blog indexes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good idea, I added a list to the indieweb wiki: <a href="https://indieweb.org/indieweb_directory#Directories_of_directories" rel="nofollow">https://indieweb.org/indieweb_directory#Directories_of_direc...</a><p>I've added three :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:52:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089830</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089830</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089830</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "Show HN: An index of indie web/blog indexes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Another index-of-indexes is <a href="https://brisray.com/web/webring-list.htm" rel="nofollow">https://brisray.com/web/webring-list.htm</a>, which tracks 648 webrings!<p>And <a href="https://brisray.com/web/indiedirs.htm" rel="nofollow">https://brisray.com/web/indiedirs.htm</a>, which has some other great indieweb indexes</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2026 00:33:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089688</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089688</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089688</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "Show HN: An index of indie web/blog indexes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I maintain a similar index-of-indexes but it's intentionally non-curated, restricted to indexes that use the OPML format, and uses autodiscovery to expand the list. The site needs some work, but it's up to 356 indexes.<p><a href="https://blogroll-network.alexsci.com/blogrolls/" rel="nofollow">https://blogroll-network.alexsci.com/blogrolls/</a><p>I'd recommend looking at anything with "planet" in the name, there are a bunch of tech communities that manage community feeds and they are high quality. There are also a ton of personal blogroll recommendations via micro.blog too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 23:40:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089299</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089299</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48089299</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "AWS North Virginia data center outage – recovery to take hours"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One of the SRE tricks is to reserve your capacity so when the cloud runs out of capacity you're still covered. It's expensive, but you don't want to get stuck without a server when the on-demand dries up.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 01:00:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070692</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070692</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070692</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "Ask HN: We just had an actual UUID v4 collision..."]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wrote about real world collisions, including that particular library last year (<a href="https://alexsci.com/blog/uuid-oops/" rel="nofollow">https://alexsci.com/blog/uuid-oops/</a>).<p>There are a bunch of constraints that must be strictly held for UUIDs to be collision resistant, I'd guess there is a problem with your random number generator.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 20:55:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068671</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068671</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48068671</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[SDLC is a power tool, not a compliance document]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.robbowley.net/2026/05/07/your-sdlc-is-a-power-tool-not-a-compliance-document/">https://blog.robbowley.net/2026/05/07/your-sdlc-is-a-power-tool-not-a-compliance-document/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057762">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057762</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 02:27:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.robbowley.net/2026/05/07/your-sdlc-is-a-power-tool-not-a-compliance-document/</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057762</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48057762</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "DNSSEC disruption affecting .de domains – Resolved"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a good index of major DNSSEC outages here, <a href="https://ianix.com/pub/dnssec-outages.html" rel="nofollow">https://ianix.com/pub/dnssec-outages.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 00:05:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48030472</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48030472</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48030472</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[GitHub Action Runner Alternatives]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://binhong.me/blog/github-action-runner-alternatives/">https://binhong.me/blog/github-action-runner-alternatives/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026072">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026072</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://binhong.me/blog/github-action-runner-alternatives/</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026072</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026072</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "Incident with Actions – Resolved"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One challenge is that they have a ton of usage under their free tier, especially by free and open source projects which have near zero budgets. Its an artificial economy of projects that cannot pay for their own usage.<p>Another challenge is that the GitHub Actions paid tier is already very expensive, the quality of service is poor, and they have major security challenges. They could load shed by raising prices, driving customers to other platforms, but they already charge 10x what others charge (<a href="https://runs-on.com/pricing/#runner-pricing" rel="nofollow">https://runs-on.com/pricing/#runner-pricing</a>, <a href="https://www.ubicloud.com/docs/about/pricing">https://www.ubicloud.com/docs/about/pricing</a>). Anyone using GitHub Actions at scale would be somewhat price insensitive already.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 17:53:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026031</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026031</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48026031</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "Incident with Actions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm a DevOps freelancer and I've moved projects off GitHub Actions in prior years (cost and security driven). Everyone uses GitHub a little differently, so there isn't a single migration path. It seems like all parts of GitHub are on fire now, but I'd generally recommend moving in stages.<p>For my personal work I did a hard cutover to GitLab last month. The issues import is the most complex part as the default import messes up issue authors.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:26:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024732</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024732</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024732</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 8organicbits in "It's official: Utah is the U.S. state closest to banning VPNs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> 'ba*s'<p>Is this balls? You can curse here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 15:48:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024149</link><dc:creator>8organicbits</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024149</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48024149</guid></item></channel></rss>