<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: 9721IsTheNumber</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=9721IsTheNumber</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 01:27:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=9721IsTheNumber" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by 9721IsTheNumber in "Terence Tao: Math 2.0 [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The sub O(n log n) significance is not in its practical "optimality". But rather that the previous lower bound was assumed to be true "by symmetry" and that result challenges some of our strongest intuitions and expectations about mathematical results. I still find this result very unsettling and a part of me remotely expects/wishes that there is some mistake somewhere.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 15:00:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50044023</link><dc:creator>9721IsTheNumber</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50044023</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50044023</guid></item></channel></rss>