<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ATechGuy2</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ATechGuy2</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 02:24:48 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ATechGuy2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ATechGuy2 in "Launch HN: Agent37 (YC F26) – Low-cost agent sandboxes for running agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is cool; pricing is certainly appealing. At the same time, there are a ton of sandboxing providers.<p>> When you look at agent harnesses, ... CPU/RAM utilization we could lower the cost.<p>How does it work today? Is the harness (assuming it means the agentic loop) located in a separate VM and each loop-run invokes a separate sandboxing VM?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:57:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50060240</link><dc:creator>ATechGuy2</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50060240</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50060240</guid></item></channel></rss>