https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=AbhiDunnaHacker News RSShttps://hnrss.org/hnrss v2.1.1Sat, 07 Nov 2026 16:18:16 +0000Everyone is arguing about whether piracy is good or bad, but that’s not what this case is about. It’s about whether the rules apply equally. A student who torrents a textbook risks a lawsuit. Meta, reportedly, torrented hundreds of thousands of books, had an employee delete his copy “due to all this litigation,” and is now arguing over which server logs it has to hand over. They could have licensed these books. The likely reason they didn’t is that the cost of getting caught is lower than the licensing fee. A court has already called the training fair use, but how the books were acquired is a separate question, and that’s where this should be decided. If an individual did this at scale, no one would call it a gray area.

]]>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:32:20 +0000https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50317614AbhiDunnahttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50317614https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50317614It depends on what’s being pirated and why. Someone who can’t afford a 200 euro textbook, or can’t buy it where they live, is in a different position from a company that downloads 200k books to build a commercial product. Individual piracy is a gray area. Doing it at scale for profit, with a legal team on standby and then deleting the evidence “due to all this litigation”, is much harder to defend. The ethics change a lot when the person doing it could easily have paid.

]]>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 16:27:07 +0000https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50317568AbhiDunnahttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50317568https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50317568