<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ActivePattern</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ActivePattern</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 20:23:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ActivePattern" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Claude Opus 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How are you supporting the claim that GPT 5.6 is "far more token efficient" than Opus 5?  Tokens equal, output <i>is</i> cheaper for Opus 5 ($25/1M) than GPT-5.6-Sol ($30/1M), and it seems to outperform slightly on agentic coding benchmarks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:38:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49039116</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49039116</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49039116</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Claude Opus 5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think you're being overly cynical here. First, I don't see any claim that is the world's best model for agentic coding. Second, it is absolutely the best model in terms of coding performance vs. dollar, and it's raw performance seems very close to the frontier.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 17:29:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49038978</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49038978</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49038978</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Scanning for Pangram Errors"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's interesting that it cares about formatting choices like bullet points.<p>On the one hand, it makes the system more brittle and arguably overfit, since it's not making a decision on the content of the writing itself. Most people would say that AI writing is still AI writing even if bullet points are removed, and vice versa.<p>On the other hand, we know that AI writing does has a very specific formatting signature (e.g. em-dashes, bullet points) so it seems unwise to completely ignore it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 14:56:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022672</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022672</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49022672</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Gemini 3.6 Flash, 3.5 Flash-Lite, and 3.5 Flash Cyber"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You would be surprised how much of a difference the model makes for certain niche tasks.<p>For my use case, `gemini-3.1-flash-lite` is ~20% higher accuracy than the next best model of comparable cost (considering both proprietary and open-weight alternatives)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 17:45:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48995643</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48995643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48995643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Dua Lipa opens library for banned and censored books in Portugal"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A lot of people in this thread think they're being clever by pointing out that a bookstore can't sell "banned" books. But it's common for bookstores and libraries to feature titles that have been banned in some jurisdictions. It's a small way to push back against censorship and promote freedom of information and critical thinking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 15:07:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818885</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818885</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818885</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "A better way to tie your gym shorts. (Or any drawstring) [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It took a few minutes to get the hang of, but it does work very nicely! Being able to adjust length without any re-tying is a great feature</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 14:56:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818734</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818734</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48818734</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Grok 4.3"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seeing this makes me wonder if Grok uses Claude conversations for training.<p>It's otherwise kind of surprising that they both converge on very similar phrases (e.g. "API integration is kicking my ass") that aren't anywhere in the prompt.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:22:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47977420</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47977420</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47977420</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "To my students"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Automatic coding systems have way too much economic value to be considered a "fad". I don't think you need to be Nostradamus to predict that we're never going back to manual coding. Sure, the systems will evolve and improve, but they're certainly not going anywhere.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 00:55:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47929226</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47929226</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47929226</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Laws of Software Engineering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're describing "modularity" or "loose coupling" in code. But it rarely implies you can just delete files or directory. It usually just means that a change in one component requires minimal changes to other components -- i.e. the diff is kept small.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 17:49:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47852057</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47852057</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47852057</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "EFF is leaving X"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>He's most definitely talking about a white homeland [1][2]<p>[1] <a href="https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1962406618886492245" rel="nofollow">https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1962406618886492245</a> 
[2] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remigration" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remigration</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 18:54:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47708062</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47708062</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47708062</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman Equation: Reinforcement Learning and Diffusion Models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Reinforcement Learning by Sutton & Barto is an excellent introduction by two of the founders of the field.<p>Read here: <a href="http://incompleteideas.net/book/the-book-2nd.html" rel="nofollow">http://incompleteideas.net/book/the-book-2nd.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 14:50:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575097</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575097</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47575097</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "BitNet: 100B Param 1-Bit model for local CPUs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The win is in how many weights you process per instruction and how much data you load.<p>So it's not that individual ops are faster — it's that the packed representation lets each instruction do more useful work, and you're moving far less data from memory to do it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 15:30:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47336918</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47336918</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47336918</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Classical statues were not painted horribly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I still don't understand is why they don't even make an attempt to apply overlayers, when (as the author notes) there is ample secondary evidence that it would be present. It's not like there isn't already some element of inference and "filling in the blanks" when reconstructing how something was painted from the scant traces of paint that survived.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 14:45:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46313231</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46313231</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46313231</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Classical statues were not painted horribly"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I assume you didn't read the article, since that's their exact point...<p>"Since underlayers are generally the only element of which traces survive, such doctrines lead to all-underlayer reconstructions, with the overlayers that were obviously originally present excluded for lack of evidence."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 14:35:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46313135</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46313135</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46313135</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "This is not the future"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I can only say being against this is either it’s self-interest or not able to grasp it.<p>So we're just waving away the carbon cost, centralization of power, privacy fallout, fraud amplification, and the erosion of trust in information? These are enormous society-level effects (and there are many more to list).<p>Dismissing AI criticism as simply ignorance says more about your own.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 16:05:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46290250</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46290250</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46290250</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "Show HN: Gemini Pro 3 imagines the HN front page 10 years from now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've never heard the caveat that it can't be attributable to misinformation in the pre-training corpus. For frontier models, we don't even have access to the enormous training corpus, so we would have no way of verifying whether or not it is regurgitating some misinformation that it had seen there or whether it is inventing something out of whole cloth.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 13:46:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46217642</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46217642</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46217642</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "OpenAI needs to raise at least $207B by 2030"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, as is implied by the word "improvements"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 16:30:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46059155</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46059155</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46059155</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "The problem with farmed seafood"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You started this by objecting to my wording ("among the most") when I said fish/chicken are the most sustainable meat options. They are, by a wide margin. Beef’s footprint is roughly 10× higher, so swapping a beef meal for chicken or fish cuts ~90% of those emissions. That’s not a "slightly less bad choice".<p>Calling harm reduction "silly" because tofu exists just shifts the target. We can hold two thoughts at once: (1) plant-heavy diets are best, and (2) for the vast majority who aren’t going vegan tomorrow, steering from beef to chicken/fish dramatically reduces damage right now. Dismissing that because it’s not maximal purity guarantees we leave real cuts on the table.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 13:50:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45835205</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45835205</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45835205</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "The problem with farmed seafood"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I <i>agree</i> it’s worth comparing beef sources! That was my point about within-category differences and harm reduction. Saying "tofu is cleaner" doesn’t make beef comparisons pointless - just like the existence of bicycles doesn’t make car fuel economy comparisons pointless. We should compare across categories and within them, so people who aren’t switching today still choose the lower-impact option.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 02:53:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45806983</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45806983</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45806983</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ActivePattern in "The problem with farmed seafood"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't think it's "unserious" to recognize that >85% of the world's population eats meat.<p>If you're quibbling about wording, all I meant was: farmed fish and chicken are among the most sustainable meat sources.<p>I'm not making a statement that people <i>should</i> eat meat, but many people <i>do</i> eat meat, so it's worth comparing which meat sources are better than others. I think it would be great if more people knew that beef produces 10x the greenhouse gases than chicken/fish do.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 20:28:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45804011</link><dc:creator>ActivePattern</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45804011</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45804011</guid></item></channel></rss>