Bitcoin's supply won't increase as costs go down, unlike other assets.

Electron programs differ. I would like WASM on Electron, moreso, I do not want JavaScript in Electron programs. I only run programs without the browser's sandbox because I trust it will not be hostile. Electron makes it harder to install extensions and investigate its behavior, which removes the entire purpose of an interpreted neutered language.

I hate programming for the web, I rarely do it, because it is such a terrible experience. I don't doubt that browser-native WASM integration will improve it.

For a typical user, having a browser-equivalent experience for extensions on native binaries is practically impossible (game mods are rarely a good experience, even with developer support).

More important than all that, which you are missing, is that all these websites, are not slow because of JavaScript; I am willing to bet (I really am) that the performance of these websites will not improve with WASM. To clarify, I do not doubt that WASM is faster than JavaScript, rather, I doubt that those that made those websites, would have made a faster website using WASM. I support my claim with the following:

- The plethora of terrible native programs that are regularly made by those same organizations (Visual Studio; a native program, which should be faster than any WASM program, is much slower than VS Code. VS Code has less features, but how many features would you need to remove from Visual Studio to achieve VS Code's performance; or for a long shot, Zed's performance). - Computers have gotten thousands of times faster, and, yet those programs have gotten slower, in absolute terms. See my argument about functionality in the previous point (all AWS does is render text, how could they have made it to be that slow). - Other, more complex tasks are done in JavaScript with good performance, no doubt they would be faster executed on WASM, but it takes from their excuse when you have a demonstrative example to the alternative. - I find that it is rare if ever that performance is addressed in those organizations, only when a program is unbearably slow, does someone then try and improve it, still, a thousand cuts kill.

Please remember that through all that, I am not arguing against WASM for no reason, but for very severe usability concerns. 10 years ago, rarely did a website offer a dark mode, but, it is my belief that extensions such as dark reader allowed for mass adoption. It would deprive those many with particular accessibility needs their ability to control the execution of these programs. Websites are nowadays the primary interface with government and banking services.

My banking app requires location access to function, it is a pain for end users to spoof it (although it does not deter any bad actors who were dedicated enough to get access to your credentials), yet the same bank (and the regulators that mandate it) do not bother to require that for the web, because spoofing it there is trivial.

Unfortunately, we can't fix the whole world's problems, but we can prevent them from ruining the web.

Finally, I am sorry for writing such a lengthy reply, and thank you for your time. :/

I think it could improve Photopea, the various office suite programs, and perhaps unknown unknowns.

But, much more important than the uncertain is the current Web which will become less accessible and closed.

The ease in reverse engineering JavaScript has more than once shown negligence and malice by Website developers (one example is the recent Google scandal, where they were diminishing the user experience on competing browsers).

If I wanted to run trusted programs, I would have used native binaries.

Where I am from, there is so little interest in the Olympics that I doubt even half my countries' population would be interested. I have never watched the Olympics ever, and amongst my family and friends, there is little to no mention of it. It is a minor cultural phenomena. This seems to me like there were large extrapolations made.

https://github.com/mikeslattery/tunic

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47330642

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Yet, it is unrealistic to expect that Canonical and Red Hat would service and maintain separate distributions of their main products. System76 could just ship a different distribution particularly catered towards compliance in problematic jurisdictions.

I personally believe that such regulations will just be more or less ignored, having no more of an affect than a disclaimer in the Terms and Conditions; unless you are Canonical or Red Hat.

Brazil, Colorado, California, and even New York soon. The list is growing too fast.

This is a very narrow scale when taking the bigger picture, as these are just prominent events in Middle Eastern history since the growth of social media usage, say after 2011.

You are not even considering the travesties avoided due to social media, what regulatory action has been avoided (or taken) to avoid social media backlashes.

You are being extremely disingenuous, and you are directly attacking some peoples' only hope of minimizing repression. I urge you to reconsider your beliefs. This directly and critically affects me.

Others have issue with their code being used in AI training, but I find no issue in that myself, my code is not exclusively mine anyway and I have no say in how it is being used.

[1] https://nat.org/