[1] https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfip/blob/60444d869e8f451aa2dca... [2] https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfip/blob/60444d869e8f451aa2dca... [3] https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfip/blob/60444d869e8f451aa2dca... [4] https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfip/blob/60444d869e8f451aa2dca...

For a simple example using your own data, save this as a file and open it via "Open trace file":

  [
    {"name": "Example 1", "ph": "X", "ts": 1, "dur": 1, "pid": 0, "tid": 0},
    {"name": "Example 2", "ph": "X", "ts": 3, "dur": 2, "pid": 0, "tid": 0},
    {"name": "Example 3", "ph": "X", "ts": 2, "dur": 1, "pid": 0, "tid": 1},
    {"name": "Example 4", "ph": "X", "ts": 4, "dur": 2, "pid": 0, "tid": 1}
  ]

  >>> 4 weeks + 59*3 hours -> days
  4 week + 59 × 3 hour  day
      = 35.375 day    [Time]

  >>> 5V / 50ohm -> mA
    5 volt / 50 ohm  milliampere
        = 100 mA    [Current]

When you were working on this, have you considered playing music that (and please don't take this the wrong way; this may be exaggerated but maybe you will understand what I mean) pre-retirement non-musicians would listen to, where the composer is still alive, and that hasn't been played in the same venue a hundred times? Looking at the Gewandhauses schedule right now, there's absolutely nothing for me.

The San Francisco Symphony plays a top-tier movie (Top Gun, Titanic, Lord of the Rings, etc.) with the film music performed live by the orchestra every few months, and I go to many of these. I got tickets for the Game of Thrones series finale concert (different venue). I absolutely loved Video Games Live, which actually has been in Leipzig too, but in the Arena, and well over a decade ago. I went to a Lindsey Stirling concert, who I knew from YouTube.

So my question is: Why can't the Gewandhaus do something like that regularly? Why can these events only be available in large cities like San Francisco? It's actually frustratingly difficult to find such events in smaller cities. Is it licensing/artist fees? Not interesting for the local musicians? Events like this reliably book out large venues several times in a row, so can it really be lack of demand? Maybe only from the wrong customers?

For example, all layout was pixel based. Making windows resizable required much complex ad-hoc code, and internationalization was hard as well. Very early in my career, I have spent person months clicking through every single screen in a large desktop application to find words cut off due to words having different lengths (measured in pixel) in different languages. I knew what "Ok" and "Cancel" meant in half a dozen languages. At the time, Java was really breaking ground with container based layouts in Swing. Delphi and Visual Basic caught up only in the .NET era.

The scrap steel probably didn't cost cents per kg when it was sold for its original purpose. You are paying for a useful shape.

A professional equivalent of weighted vests are ballistic plate carriers. Real ballistic plates can be fragile and expensive, so options for exercising in (or milsim games in airsoft etc.) include expired (and failed to re-certify) real ballistic plates, made for purpose training plates... or plate shaped sandbags!

Generally speaking, if you own the IP space, it just needs to be announced in BGP and traffic will come. You can either peer with someone yourself and get transit from them, or have them advertise it for you.

It's possible even for a private person to do it, if they have one of several workable mixes of knowledge, time, cash, contacts and technical requirements. I've done it for a while.

The main practical question really is who will peer with you and with what conditions. For example, your ISP will absolutely not do this on a consumer plan, but might on a business plan. AWS will do it for busineses as well: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/ec2-byoi...

If you want to learn more about BGP, anyone can sign up for DN42, which is a free, large, shared environment that is a small scale replica of the internet. Everyone gets to be their own AS, get some IP space allocated, establish links to other participants (usually VPN tunnels over the real internet), and do BGP peerings over them. https://dn42.eu/Home

G5 is defined as K_p = 9. That happened in Oct 2003. https://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/geophys/kp-ap/kp-freq/kp2003.frq

What if Tesla pulls the rug on existing models and stops supporting them after a few years? It's not an outlandish fear. Musk has been wildly unpredictable, anything could happen. And given e.g. the recent story about how a Tesla car wouldn't even start again without calling support for some kind of remote maintenance, Tesla owners seem to be more dependent on the company's support than average. It wouldn't surprise me at all if Teslas were generally one expired TLS certificate inside the car away from being bricked.

(Of course Unraid, being based on Slackware, has a legacy init system that doesn't support this scheme. But there are enough other options.)

The PHP scripts certainly are a horrible mess, in all ways. For example, shell injection prevention is based on using escapeshellarg at each call site... that pattern is _exactly_ the structural root cause for vulnerabilities like the one D-Link had.

In no particular order, and obviously not exhaustive: Everything runs directly as root - nginx, php-fpm, smb, ... No AppArmor/SELinux. There is no Secure Boot support (especially unfortunate since boot is from USB stick). No HTTPS access to web frontend by default. SMB protocol defaults are insecure. SMB shares default to public. SSH allows password-based root login. Pools are unencrypted at rest by default. They have a checkbox to enable telnet for management! Very permissive iptables rules. Almost any features that real competitors like Synology would officially provide come from third parties via a moderately shady app store.

Note it's not about any of these individual points. I see above as signal that they are not security experts and see security as an afterthought, rather than as something that deserves a team of experts that specifically cares about it.

(There's certainly other fields they also aren't experts in, like UX - their predominant UI pattern is "list of dropdown fields". Even in storage, one could have a longer discussion how their Array feature - the true core of their product -, compares to modern solutions. There's a reason they've evolved cache pools to just pools as a separate thing, and some users do pool-only Unraid...)

That's all quite understandable since it's a small team with only 2-3 coders (https://unraid.net/about). But nevertheless.

"The most recent grant of a hereditary peerage was in 2019 for the youngest child of Elizabeth II, Prince Edward"[2]

[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_Lords_Act_1999

[2] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hereditary_peer

- As a beginner, they help you crash less. You can learn enough basics to save some real money in avoided crashes. The sims pay for themselves right away, you can just buy them all. The sim-isms don't matter so much.

- As a skilled pilot, they help you crash more. You can safely iterate on your maneuvers really really well (no repairs, immediate retry from same conditions, always good weather, fly from home). You'll have an idea where the differences are and how you need to compensate with the actual craft. You can tune the virtual counterpart to be a bit closer.

They complement real model flying, they just cant replace it. (And even that is questionable. I bet many just can't afford real model flying. Sims might help them scratch the itch.)

A _really accurate_ flight sim is actually hard to do though, for a few reasons. Aerodynamic modelling is hard (there are lots of interesting effects), and that almost every model aircraft is unique (due to home building) and constantly changes (crashes, repairs, upgrades) probably doesn't help. And neither does that the core idea behind multirotors is unstable flight, which entirely depends on the firmware. There are different firmware projects (Betaflight is the most popular for racing, but not the only), and they are quite tunable. Can't simulate that accurately; it would have to be firmware in the loop.