<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: AstroChimpHam</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=AstroChimpHam</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 08:51:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=AstroChimpHam" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Ask HN: How to learn sales?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Engineer turned B2B founder here. I've sold to a lot of large $100M+/year businesses at this point, so feel decently qualified to answer this question. The top three things that helped me:<p>1. Listen to yourself pitch. Ask people you talk to if it's OK to record the pitch and then listen to it repeatedly and take notes. It will be painful, and you'll notice so many things you hate, but you will get better. This is the number one thing that helped me get better.<p>2. Understand your customer. Really understand them. What are their hopes with buying your product? What are their fears if they make the wrong choice, or no choice at all? The stuff that's really at the core of these questions-- it's deep, personal, often embarrassing stuff people won't just tell you. Getting at this sort of thing is a skill. If you do it well, you'll not only sell better, you'll have a better sales process, and probably a better product.<p>3. Read Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion (<a href="https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28815.Influence" rel="nofollow">https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/28815.Influence</a>) by Robert Cialdini. If you're a former engineer, you'll especially love this book. It helps you understand how people tick, including yourself, and some of the techniques your competition are probably using.<p>Finally, don't be an asshole. It's so easy when you get good at sales to view the sale itself as the goal. It shouldn't be. The goal should be solving the customer's problem. Getting the sale is the first step, but make sure you only get it if you can genuinely help the customer-- if the customer will be thrilled they bought from you a month from now. The world has too many assholes willing to sell people the wrong thing for them. Don't be another one.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 01:57:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24612181</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24612181</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24612181</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Machine Learning and Vodka]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBSVoAR8kKc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBSVoAR8kKc</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867517">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867517</a></p>
<p>Points: 9</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2020 15:56:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBSVoAR8kKc</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867517</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22867517</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Zappos 2012 data breach settlement"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't know why more people don't say this. I agree 1000%. This should absolutely be the case. Why should anyone have a lower probability of winning a lawsuit just because they're poor?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2019 23:21:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21287266</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21287266</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21287266</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Amazon Unveils Futuristic Helicopter-Plane Hybrid Drone for Deliveries"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Posting about how they're going to take over delivery while being investigated for antitrust stuff is an interesting choice.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2019 22:29:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20109787</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20109787</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20109787</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Ask HN: How can I work towards building a company while employed?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Save money. Get a job that pays as much as possible, even if it has shitty clauses around side projects, and just save as much money as you can. When you have 1-2 years of nest egg saved up (might be eating ramen, etc), then quit and go work on your company.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 16:25:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20023257</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20023257</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20023257</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Tech billionaires who donate millions are just “bribing society at large.”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This already happened on healthcare. He already has a healthcare initiative: <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/20/dr-atul-gawande-to-lead-buffett-bezos-dimons-health-care-venture.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/20/dr-atul-gawande-to-lead-buff...</a>.<p>The thing to bear in mind with this is they're all constantly looking at a bunch of other initiatives before jumping in, so if one of these people had a comment to a reporter on just about anything it's probably not the first time they're thinking about that subject.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 23:35:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19997076</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19997076</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19997076</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Tech billionaires who donate millions are just “bribing society at large.”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Snarky comments aside, Zuckerberg built a massive ads business from scratch, not previously knowing anything about ads. He built a massive social network from scratch, not knowing anything previously about social.<p>Bezos built the biggest e-commerce business in the world, never having worked in e-commerce or retail before. And seems to be doing some impressive stuff at Blue Origin, not knowing anything about space travel.<p>That's all not to mention Musk, who goes from new industry to new industry, building successful businesses that fundamentally change those industries, without previously knowing anything about those industries.<p>These are incredibly impressive accomplishments. They've proven their bonafides for solving general problems in fields they weren't previously familiar with, probably more than just about anyone else in the world.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2019 19:17:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19995008</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19995008</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19995008</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Tech billionaires who donate millions are just “bribing society at large.”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've had this thought before, but always come back to what happens after they hit that limit?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 22:00:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19986023</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19986023</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19986023</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Tech billionaires who donate millions are just “bribing society at large.”"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> but, he asked, why should they be treated as sagacious experts when they come from a completely different arena<p>Because they have a history of getting impressive shit done. Not complained about, but actually done. And they have the will to get it done, and a bunch of capital to put behind that will, even if they were taxed at whatever ridiculously high rate Giridharadas wants them taxed at.<p>Giridharadas is welcome to disagree with successful people, but they've at this point proven their opinions do tend to matter when it comes to shaping the country whether we want to pay attention or not.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 21:49:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19985923</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19985923</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19985923</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Site Search Could Kill Amazon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a really fair question. Amazon doesn't do it well, but just about no one currently does it better. It's like looking at Yahoo or AltaVista before Google came out and saying they're plenty successful without having incredible search.<p>Of course, it's not the same, and retailers need to do a hundred other things correctly as well, but there is a lot of data to show that people go where the good search is.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:41:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19249251</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19249251</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19249251</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Site Search Could Kill Amazon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Founder here. It's a probabilistic problem from the perspective of solving personalization. If you tend to want something different after trying the same thing a bunch of times, the algorithm should learn that as well-- that's also personalization.<p>There's also been a ton of research done that most consumers do want personalized experiences, will pay more for them, and will be more likely to churn if they don't have them. There's a pretty good list at <a href="https://venturebeat.com/2017/08/18/hyper-personalization-marketing-to-a-segment-of-one-vb-live/" rel="nofollow">https://venturebeat.com/2017/08/18/hyper-personalization-mar...</a>.<p>Some examples from that article:<p>>>> Forrester uncovered the fact that 77 percent of consumers have chosen, recommended, or even paid more for a brand that provides a personalized service or experience.<p>Accenture found that 75 percent of consumers are more likely to buy when you show you recognize them as an individual and provide recommendations based on their unique wants and needs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 20:30:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19249142</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19249142</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19249142</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Site Search Could Kill Amazon]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.mytotalretail.com/article/how-site-search-could-kill-amazon/">https://www.mytotalretail.com/article/how-site-search-could-kill-amazon/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19247859">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19247859</a></p>
<p>Points: 28</p>
<p># Comments: 27</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2019 18:12:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.mytotalretail.com/article/how-site-search-could-kill-amazon/</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19247859</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19247859</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Why the world needs deep generalists, not specialists"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The author focuses on the generalists who did great things, but ignores the specialists who do important work, and speaks nothing of the many jack-of-all-trades who can’t find a job because their knowledge isn’t deep enough in any valuable area. If anything, most of the people I’ve seen not hired and let go has been due to not enough specialized knowledge, and this preventing them from being effective.<p>The software engineer unemployment rate in the US is something like 1.6%. Engineers who specialize in self-driving cars get paid absurd amounts because there aren’t enough of them. We need more specialists, not generalists. If they’re specialists in more than one thing, that’s even better, but it’s not the main problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2018 22:59:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18482956</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18482956</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18482956</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Optimizing trie-based spelling correction algorithms at Constructor.io]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://blog.constructor.io/2017/07/12/optimizing-trie-based-spelling-correction-algorithms-at-constructor-io/">http://blog.constructor.io/2017/07/12/optimizing-trie-based-spelling-correction-algorithms-at-constructor-io/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14800470">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14800470</a></p>
<p>Points: 24</p>
<p># Comments: 7</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:14:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://blog.constructor.io/2017/07/12/optimizing-trie-based-spelling-correction-algorithms-at-constructor-io/</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14800470</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14800470</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "OnlineSchemaChange rebuilt in Python, with more features to update MySQL schemas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What does this do that Percona's pt-online-schema-change tool doesn't do?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 02:54:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14278429</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14278429</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14278429</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Uber's head of communications is leaving the company"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>sure :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 19:56:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14101160</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14101160</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14101160</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Uber's head of communications is leaving the company"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>People downvoted you because you're saying they want Uber to burn due to sensationalism and not because it's a genuinely bad company. It sounds condescending and probably pissed people off.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 00:01:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14093614</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14093614</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14093614</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "State of the Seed Market in 2017"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have a number of acquaintances in the situation where they tried to go out and raise a proper Bay Area seed of $1-1.5m, got told they needed more traction, and wound up giving up part of the way through, stopping the round at ~$300k and calling it an angel. Then, traction appears and they come back to finish that initial seed round. Every time I've heard of this happening, the issue was investors becoming more careful with their money rather than founders underestimating how much money they'd need.<p>Small sample size and all, but if this is the way things are going, it'd be a good thing and force more founders to focus on metrics that matter early.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2017 19:19:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13970788</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13970788</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13970788</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Crystal: Fast as C, Slick as Ruby"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cython looks like typed Python. Crystal looks like typed Ruby. Both are compiled, and both are not quite as fast as C, but much faster than the language they're based off of. The point of both is to be able to write something that looks like a clean scripting language while getting close to the speed of C. Was that unclear, or are you just trolling?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 21:00:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12228448</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12228448</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12228448</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by AstroChimpHam in "Crystal: Fast as C, Slick as Ruby"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So, this is like Ruby's answer to cython?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2016 07:58:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12224106</link><dc:creator>AstroChimpHam</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12224106</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12224106</guid></item></channel></rss>