<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Austiiiiii</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Austiiiiii</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 21:35:32 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Austiiiiii" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Austiiiiii in "Bring back crappy forums"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In addition to the "gamified" aspect, the votes allow special interests to trivially control the perceived public opinion on an extremely broad scale. Opinions with downvotes are perceived as unpopular, and this has a chilling effect on free discussion.<p>A real person who expresses an idea and gets downvoted by a passing Russian propaganda bot may see the vote (and subsequent Reddit weighting algorithm fuckery that turns the one well-timed vote into 10 votes, which a lot of people aren't aware of) and feel ridiculed, which will discourage that person from expressing the same idea in the future.<p>Other people who see the same post with X downvotes will take note that that idea is unpopular, and may unconsciously realign their own views on the idea to fit what appears to be the prevailing opinion.<p>And of course crappy old forums have the other advantage of not having any single standard registration process or API that can be exploited by bots en masse. That's not going to keep them out entirely, but it drastically increases the logistical cost.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 16:59:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764267</link><dc:creator>Austiiiiii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764267</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48764267</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Austiiiiii in "Tesla Releases Stripped RWD Cybertruck: So Much Worse for Not Much Less Money"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I mean, I'd buy it if it was like $5000, a compact car, and the person running the company wasn't an unlovable sociopath. Some people like the janky cheap aesthetic.<p>But $100k for a car like that is a complete insult to good taste. It'd be like selling a luxury 1.5m container home. The low price tag is the entire point of the jank aesthetic. You're supposed to be communicating that you reject the idea of "keeping up with the Joneses" and wear the aesthetic imperfections of the lower economic class as a badge of honor.<p>Of course, as with every cultural movement of any nuance, real world Dr. Eggman completely missed the point here and shat all over everything with his tone-deaf Rich Frat Boy With Asperger's schtick.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2025 18:32:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43674821</link><dc:creator>Austiiiiii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43674821</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43674821</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Austiiiiii in "Multiple Russia-aligned threat actors actively targeting Signal Messenger"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a new feature to sync old messages that seems like it could potentially make that attack vector ten times worse:<p><a href="https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/signal-will-let-you-sync-old-messages-when-linking-new-devices/" rel="nofollow">https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/signal-will-l...</a><p>Would a malicious URL be able to activate this feature as part of the request?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2025 21:41:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43108094</link><dc:creator>Austiiiiii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43108094</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43108094</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Austiiiiii in "De-Muskifier: Firefox add-on to replace all instances of Elon Musk with raccoons"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>He started off wealthy from his dad's blood emerald enterprise. Then he really took off buying into PayPal, a middle man service for making secure money transactions online. Literally got rich off the dot-com boom. That is textbook definition of right place, right time.<p>Every tech company he owns, he bought. He doesn't do any of the engineering. The only genius he possesses is in creating public hype for products he has invested in. It is 100% persona.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 20:11:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42870492</link><dc:creator>Austiiiiii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42870492</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42870492</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Austiiiiii in "OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>On further reading, I'll grant the first point. Although I wonder if they'll have a technical out—say they distilled from several smaller research companies that had distilled from OpenAI for research purposes, which to my understanding would not constitute a violation of the terms of service.<p>As for it getting banned, TikTok was banned partly because of credible accounts of it having been used by China to track political enemies. Are we thinking they'll expand the argument on national security to say that <i>any</i> application that transfers data to China is a national security threat? Because that could be a very slippery slope.<p>And in any case, such a measure seems like it would only bar access to the DeepSeek <i>app</i>. Surely no one could argue that the underlying open source model, if run locally on American soil, could constitute a security threat, right?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:58:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42870315</link><dc:creator>Austiiiiii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42870315</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42870315</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Austiiiiii in "OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And we'd be shooting ourselves in the foot to do so. If America is forced to use only the clunky corporate-owned American AI at a fee, we'll very quickly fall behind competitors worldwide who use DeepSeek models to produce better results for much, much cheaper.<p>Not to mention it'd defeat the whole purpose of a "free market" economy. (Not that that means much of anything anymore)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 19:20:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42869787</link><dc:creator>Austiiiiii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42869787</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42869787</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Austiiiiii in "OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is there any reason they wouldn't rule the same way on DeepSeek training on OpenAI data? After all, one of the big selling points of GPT has been that businesses can freely use the information provided. They're paying for the service, after all. I'd very be interested to know how DeepSeek's usage (very reasonably assuming that they paid for their OpenAI subscription) is any different.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:11:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42866778</link><dc:creator>Austiiiiii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42866778</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42866778</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Austiiiiii in "De-Muskifier: Firefox add-on to replace all instances of Elon Musk with raccoons"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You know, you might as well give it up. He won't give you a free Tesla Truck no matter how brown your nose gets.<p>The guy's an insufferable manchild with no more actual tech chops than the average boomer, made all the more dangerous by a severe case of Dunning-Kruger. He can't distinguish between reality and sci-fi, and goes around and buys companies that he thinks will make him look like real life Tony Stark.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2025 18:19:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42741515</link><dc:creator>Austiiiiii</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42741515</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42741515</guid></item></channel></rss>