Why don't we all have small farms on our properties, turning lawns into vegetable producing land for each household?

Why don't we have small datacenters on the property of each business, so the business users and IT folks can keep track of their own servers and data and applications?

Also because the companies are beholden to shareholders and their financial best interest. cutting off millions of clients to make a political statement is not in the companies best financial interest and would likely result in a shareholder lawsuit.

Is it somehow illegal to have many sim cards in the same place as having many radios?

The telco's are also capable of bringing down the network, and they are legally allowed to turn their services off. Its not government infrastructure, its a business. If the backbone ISP providers decided to turn off their services for an area for a time, thats fine, there are contractual provisions to deal with that. its not a crime.

There has been no mention of arrest, was this 'crime' perpetrated by the infamous hackerman in ablack hoodie?

Post quantum algorithms have been available. You can do it today. Why not for bitcoin?

In reality, there are very few current real world implementations. This article makes it seem that RSA is under active exploitation. If it is, bitcoin is not the first target IMO

does bitcoin or UTXO's somehow for some reason generate multiple PUBLIC keys for the same private key?

They aren't pushing the teabags to the top, they're digging to defecate.

Why are you focused on YC/startups? Are you interested in the stock options, as a get rich quick scheme? Or are you interested in working during your life and being employed.

Working 60-80 hours a week is above normal and should be compensated as such. Startup stock is a huge risk.

Are you curious why the founders of a company spend 24/7 working it, and why they expect you to do the same? Well there you go, its the only thing the founder thinks about, and they want people to support them in that.

HOW ARE THEY COMPENSATING YOU. Thats the only thing that matters. If you make $1mil/year plus bonus, 80 hrs a week seems more reasonable.

if you take someone elses public IPv4 address and they're using it, neither one of you will be functional, and they will come knocking on your door.

It's similar to arresting someone because they are speaking French. I don't speak French and I don't like people who speak French because sometimes French people say stuff I don't agree with. I don't know what they're saying but I hate it.

It took 3 years but the FBI published the names of the fellows they believe are responsible for breaching equifax and stealing private data about half of americans

Wu Zhiyong, Wang Qian, Xu Ke, and Liu Lei

What are the financials of bank of dave? How many of his loans have defaulted? How does he analyze the risk he is undertaking?

What happens to Dave if 10% of his friends cannot or decide not to pay him back?

Why does Dave, an individual, have so many resources that he can support thousands of his friends schemes they couldn't afford? Maybe we look at the top down redistribution of wealth. There are so few people controlling so much money and influence.

Has anyone been convicted of anything? We are siezing control of personally owned assets under the presumption the responsible parties will be found guilty. That seems like a slippery slope.

If you can describe a woman's voice and mannerisms and the result sounds similar to a copyrighted performance, that is natural circumstance.

If you want an example of purposefully imitating something with a copyright, look at GNU. Anyone who looked at the UNIX code was realistically prevented from writing their own kernel with similar functions. But if a handful of folks describe what the kernel ended up doing and some guy in his own head comes up with some C code and assembly to do end up with the same high level functions, well thats just fine, even if you include the original name.

The details matter. There is absolutely enough vocal difference, it doesn't take an audiologist to hear the two voices do sound different but very close. It would not be hard for the producers to describe "a" voice and that description would overlap heavily with ScarJo, and wow the marketing team reached out to see if she would attempt to fill the existing requirements. When she said no, they found a suitable alternative. If the intent was to have ScarJo do the voice and she said no and they did it anyways, thats illegal.