<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: BruzWJ</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=BruzWJ</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 03:24:02 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=BruzWJ" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by BruzWJ in "Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (July 2026)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have been working on this project for building personal AI trading systems.<p>The core idea is using TradingView style alert system as N8N workflow trigger to run analysis and order executions with live market data monitoring.<p>I personally tried many "AI trading" tools but none of them handle things the way I expect. Most of them run on a schedule based analysis like every 5 minutes or daily, and almost all of the ones perform analysis through a AI black box with no transparency for how the analysis is performed and what data was referenced.<p>So I ended up making one myself that trigger analysis at more meaningful moments generated by my technical indicators, and run the analysis that I personally configured with inspectable steps and detailed info for better reviews, then tune the workflow to be more reproducible and reliable.<p>Currently working on a MCP that let Codex or Claude Code be able to edit indicators and workflows, as well as setting up monitors for me. I originally made a Copilot system for this but it's too expensive since it uses API keys to access AI services, would be much cheaper with subscription backed access via MCP :D<p>I value transparency a lot when it comes to trading analysis, not sure if anyone else feels the same</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 17:36:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910315</link><dc:creator>BruzWJ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910315</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910315</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by BruzWJ in "TradingGoose-Market: canonical ticker identity across market data providers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem we kept running into was simple to describe but annoying in practice: the same stock, currency pair, or crypto pair can have different symbols depending on the data provider or target trading platform. To solve this problem cleanly, we built a shared listing identity management tool (alternative to OpenFigi) so each provider can render its own symbol format without changing the underlying record. It also covers market grouping, trading hours, holiday closures, and early closes as structured data.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:55:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700182</link><dc:creator>BruzWJ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700182</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700182</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[TradingGoose-Market: canonical ticker identity across market data providers]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.tradinggoose.ai/blog/building-tradinggoose-market">https://www.tradinggoose.ai/blog/building-tradinggoose-market</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700181">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700181</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 06:55:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.tradinggoose.ai/blog/building-tradinggoose-market</link><dc:creator>BruzWJ</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700181</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47700181</guid></item></channel></rss>