If you are wondering ‘How are you getting that much failure’, it’s because I like to freeze older versions and they often decay for one reason or another (can’t get files for example)

This isn’t a zero sum game, I’m happy to hear from people both previously inside OpenAI and completely independent of them.

Yes, it is easier to have a moral compass when you don’t have to worry about you and your children starving. But that doesn’t imply that moral compass is wrong or broken.

I've spent significant chunks of my career help people throw away backtracking searchers people polished over years with a CP-SAT model I threw together in 30 minutes, often much to their upset.

You can for Sudoku often beat a CP-SAT solver, but that's because the problems are trivial and take milliseconds. If you look at more difficult Sudoku variants, or 16x16 grids, backtracking solvers start to fall behind.

People used to solve logic problems by hand, verify logic. Now you pile it into a computer. The problem has been around for a while, no-one fully ‘understands’ the proof of the four colour theorem as a big chunk is computer proved.

We are now just changing (admittedly greatly) what we can put in a box marked ‘checked by computer.

For a start LLMs love LLM generated text, so you are boosting papers people never had any input in.

Secondly, LLMs in my experience are good at small issues, but fail totally at the whole paper being obviously poorly constructed, or clearly fake.

If you want help, I've done some similar work, you could pop it up on a github repo or something. What is the game?

1) AI companies all get sued out of existence.

2) AI companies can train networks with piracy, those networks don't fall under copyright, so give me a copy to do what I want with.

Also, companies spent a long time telling us downloading single songs via Napster was the worst thing ever, before torrenting every book in existence themselves. I don’t believe any of these companies have paid for all the books they have trained on.