<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: CarterWilliams</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=CarterWilliams</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 22:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=CarterWilliams" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CarterWilliams in "Lichess and Take Take Take Sign Cooperation Agreement"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah that’s a really interesting point. The openness is mainly what makes Lichess so powerful for organizers and developers.<p>chess67 looks interesting from my perspective as a coach and club organizer, especially for running tournaments and gaining exposure for my coaching and events.<p>But I do wonder where the boundary is long term. If more tools start tapping into the player pool, there’s probably a balance between staying open and preventing people from just free riding on the Lichess ecosystem.<p>Either way, it’s pretty unique. You don’t really see that level of accessibility elsewhere in the chess world.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 17:25:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706534</link><dc:creator>CarterWilliams</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706534</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706534</guid></item></channel></rss>