<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ClayShentrup</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ClayShentrup</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 15:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ClayShentrup" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>i know. and my point was, that's irrational. other voters determine the election result YOU have to live with.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48576417</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48576417</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48576417</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>that person is STRATEGIC VOTERS, who are about 90% of the electorate. even if you want to vote honestly, you're still subject to the whims of other voters.<p>indeed, practically the only thing that matters in a voting method is the aggregate affect of what it achieves in light of other voters. YOUR vote will almost never make a difference. you could upgrade voting methods in exchange for giving up your right to vote, and you'd still be drastically better off.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 21:42:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48562538</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48562538</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48562538</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>it doesn't really matter how you define "honest". what matters is how people actually vote. the only really crucial distinction for "honest" versus "strategic" is that "honest" can't consider viability. in the simulations, we just use "approve everyone you like more than average". optimal strategy is to approve everyone you like more than the expected utility of the winner.
<a href="https://rangevoting.net/RVstrat6" rel="nofollow">https://rangevoting.net/RVstrat6</a><p>here's lots of detail. you can run the code for yourself.
<a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegDum.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegDum.html</a><p>here's a slightly different model from the late harvard stats phd, jameson quinn.
<a href="https://electionscience.github.io/vse-sim/" rel="nofollow">https://electionscience.github.io/vse-sim/</a><p>don't "trust" anything. look at the data. you could also read the book "gaming the vote" by william poundstone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 21:41:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48562527</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48562527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48562527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>score voting gets better results than the alternatives with ANY AMOUNT OF STRATEGIC VOTING.<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig</a><p><a href="https://electionscience.org/research-hub/tactical-voting-basics" rel="nofollow">https://electionscience.org/research-hub/tactical-voting-bas...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 02:50:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549944</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549944</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549944</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> That gains it a point but there are much better methods.<p>utterly false.<p><a href="https://electionscience.github.io/vse-sim/vse-graph.html" rel="nofollow">https://electionscience.github.io/vse-sim/vse-graph.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 02:49:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549936</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549936</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549936</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I vote my actual ranking<p>no you don't. take a warren supporter who votes biden to stop trump. that person ranks:<p>biden 1st, warren 2nd, trump 3rd<p>they don't want warren to be a spoiler.<p><a href="http://rangevoting.net/TarrIrv" rel="nofollow">http://rangevoting.net/TarrIrv</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 02:49:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549929</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549929</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549929</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>score voting is extremely good.<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig</a><p>compressing it to approval voting doesn't hurt very much and makes the ballot extremely simple.<p>> I don't see how.<p>i just showed you how. better average voter satisfaction, better resistance to strategy, etc.<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig</a><p>not to mention radically simpler:<p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190219005733/" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20190219005733/</a><p><a href="https://sites.google.com/a/electology.org/www/approval-voting-vs-irv" rel="nofollow">https://sites.google.com/a/electology.org/www/approval-votin...</a><p>IRV is a strategic mess that maintains a two party system.<p>wonk.blog/duopoly<p><a href="https://clayshentrup.medium.com/later-no-harm-72c44e145510" rel="nofollow">https://clayshentrup.medium.com/later-no-harm-72c44e145510</a><p><a href="https://clayshentrup.medium.com/star-voting-is-simpler-than-irv-84b8990986f2" rel="nofollow">https://clayshentrup.medium.com/star-voting-is-simpler-than-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 02:46:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549909</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549909</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48549909</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>thanks for actually knowing what you're talking about.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:20:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48548420</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48548420</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48548420</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Noise infusion banned from statistical products published by Census Bureau"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>no it does not.<p><a href="http://rangevoting.net/CoreSuppPocket" rel="nofollow">http://rangevoting.net/CoreSuppPocket</a>
<a href="https://wonk.blog/duopoly" rel="nofollow">https://wonk.blog/duopoly</a><p>approval voting actually DOES and it is better in every other way too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 23:20:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48548415</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48548415</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48548415</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Online age-verification tools for child safety are surveilling adults"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>preach, brudda.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 23:32:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371426</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371426</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371426</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Online age-verification tools for child safety are surveilling adults"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>what's so bad about IRV?<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/CoreSuppPocket" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/CoreSuppPocket</a>
<a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig</a><p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190219005733/https://sites.google.com/a/electology.org/www/approval-voting-vs-irv" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20190219005733/https://sites.goo...</a><p><a href="https://clayshentrup.medium.com/later-no-harm-72c44e145510" rel="nofollow">https://clayshentrup.medium.com/later-no-harm-72c44e145510</a>
<a href="https://clayshentrup.medium.com/star-voting-is-simpler-than-irv-84b8990986f2" rel="nofollow">https://clayshentrup.medium.com/star-voting-is-simpler-than-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 23:32:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371425</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371425</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371425</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Online age-verification tools for child safety are surveilling adults"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>nailed it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 23:31:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371419</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371419</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371419</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Online age-verification tools for child safety are surveilling adults"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>a common fallacy of basic logic.<p>with FPTP, strategic voting means NOT voting for your favorite. so at the very least, you'd "vote for the person you'd normally support under FPTP, _plus_ everyone you like better".<p>but in real life, a lot of people will use intermediate scores.<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 23:31:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371415</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371415</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47371415</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Following 35% growth, solar has passed hydro on US grid"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>there's no such thing as "acceptable" or not, there are just utilities and _relative_ satisfaction. you want to get the most satisfaction possible from the options you have.<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6</a><p>approval voting is insanely good at this.<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 04:52:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47162016</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47162016</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47162016</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>massively false based on actual data.
<a href="https://clayshentrup.medium.com/star-voting-is-simpler-than-irv-84b8990986f2" rel="nofollow">https://clayshentrup.medium.com/star-voting-is-simpler-than-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:26:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042141</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042141</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042141</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>this is dead simple. thousands of voters have had no problem.
<a href="https://approval.vote/" rel="nofollow">https://approval.vote/</a><p>if you really want to get into the game theory, here it is.
<a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/RVstrat6</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:25:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042132</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042132</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042132</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>it's the worst of the commonly discussed alternatives.<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:25:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042128</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042128</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042128</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LOL, people get it just fine. fargo adopted it by a 64% supermajority and st louis adopted it by a 68% supermajority.<p><a href="https://approval.vote/" rel="nofollow">https://approval.vote/</a><p>> You can explain to me until you're blue in the face why approval is strictly better even in this situation, but I am emotionally attached to my vote counting for Bernie more than any other candidate, so reason isn't going to work on my lizard brain.<p>but your actual strategy is to rank hillary in 1st because bernie can't win. or, in the case of my aunt, she preferred warren but voted biden to beat trump. she would have ranked them biden>warren>trump in a ranked election for that very reason. this is called "compromise strategy".<p>bro, approving both of them is better than being strategically forced to say that you prefer clinton to bernie or biden to warren.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:24:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042123</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042123</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042123</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "Amazon's Ring and Google's Nest reveal the severity of U.S. surveillance state"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>it's ironic that approval voting is better, but people therefore often wrongly think it's less optimal, when it's actually _more_ optimal.<p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190219005733/https://sites.google.com/a/electology.org/www/approval-voting-vs-irv" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20190219005733/https://sites.goo...</a><p>you used to live across the street from me on harper street in berkeley by the way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 00:21:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042107</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47042107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ClayShentrup in "The EU moves to kill infinite scrolling"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>the voting method is HUGELY important.<p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/RelImport" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/RelImport</a><p><a href="https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig" rel="nofollow">https://www.rangevoting.org/BayRegsFig</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 02:49:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47020588</link><dc:creator>ClayShentrup</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47020588</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47020588</guid></item></channel></rss>