Hacker News: ClownsAbound

New comment by ClownsAbound in "Vaccines, past and present"

ClownsAbound — Fri, 04 Oct 2024 18:25:59 +0000

Another good quote from Bret Weinstein a few days ago: “There is a, and the oldest vaccine technology involves using an attenuated pathogen, that is to say a relative of the thing that actually threatens your health and giving you an infection. Your body responds to infections. It's one of the things it does very well. So if it has an infection, it can learn the antigen that it is supposed to be targeting. Now vaccine manufacturers do not like this technology. And there are reasons they don't like it. One, it's cumbersome, right? You have to actually cultivate these organisms and because you're cultivating them, they can evolve. They can evolve once the patient has the infection. So it's a little bit scary, that technology. But what they've replaced it with is an inferior technology where they separate the antigens, where you're getting something inert and dead and the body does not respond to it like an infection and therefore does not develop the immunity, right? They're weak is what they are. And as a trick to trigger the immune system to react as if it has an infection, they're basically giving you a chemical sickness, right? They're tricking your body into thinking it's sick so that the body then is in surveillance mode trying to figure out which of the particles that are present are actually hostile with no mechanism for telling it how to distinguish between ragweed and some antigen of a virus. So of course this would cause autoimmune disorders, allergies, it will cause dysregulation of that entire extremely elegant system. So I guess what I'm realizing, and I'm still somewhere in this trajectory, is that much of what allows us to protect our own health are based on assumptions that simply are not met by the mechanisms that are being employed, right? You think that there is a system that tests vaccines carefully to make sure that nothing is injected into you for which the benefit does not exceed the cost. That is simply not true. These things are being created because they're profitable. They are being created in ways that are economically efficient at arbitrary cost to human health."

New comment by ClownsAbound in "Vaccines, past and present"

ClownsAbound — Fri, 04 Oct 2024 18:19:25 +0000

Brett Weinstein posted this in X / Twitter recently: “They love the mRNA technology because, A, it's cheap to produce. I mean, basically, you can produce a new vaccine by typing a sequence into a computer. Yeah. Right? B, it allows them to take a bunch of shots that are arduous to produce, streamline their production so it's economically tremendously efficient. C, you can produce shots for a whole bunch of new things without having to come up with some uh new protocol for producing them because it's all the same. D, you can tell the FDA well this is the same shot you've already authorized. So we're just gonna. It's already been proven to be the same technology. Yeah, we'll just test the antigen this time, see if the antigen causes any special problems. So your control group and your treatment group are both gonna have the pathologies of the mRNA platform. They're gonna disappear because you get the same amount of pathology in both groups. So anyway, it's a dream come true for the ruthless bastards in pharma. It's a nightmare from the point of view of patients. Absolute nightmare”

New comment by ClownsAbound in "Starlink offering free internet access for 30 days for Hurricane Helene victims"

ClownsAbound — Thu, 03 Oct 2024 23:24:34 +0000

Or put another way Musk is anti censorship, anti war in Ukraine, anti complying with the Harris/Biden agenda to deplatform political rivals such as they did 4 days after Biden took office, forcing Pre Musk Twitter/X and Facebook to do their bidding - or else. Turns out the ones squawking loudest about the other being a threat to democracy are in fact the ones actively working against our Constitutional Rights. And I’m a lifelong Democrat who changed to Indy and won’t support these clowns going forward. Wake up before the US is just like the UK and the police are at your door because of a post they disagree with - fuck the first amendment, right? Just like Harris and Walz just said, the first amendment doesn’t protect misinformation or hate speech… actually; it 100% does but the boomer news is gonna try to make us all believe more of their lies.

New comment by ClownsAbound in "CNN and USA Today have fake websites, I believe Forbes Marketplace runs them"

ClownsAbound — Fri, 27 Sep 2024 16:05:18 +0000

You’re omitting how much influence / censorship our government have over these institutions now, and how much they apply pressure to prevent dissenting voices and opinions from reaching the main stream.