Its both about your decision making in getting to that point, and about what you might do to get out from under those debts.

Exactly the issue we see in this situation.

Then we have the increase in incidence. The incidence rate is already small in those age groups, so even doubling it is a tiny number.

I'm going to stop taking it (I take something between 1/10 and 1/5 of my prescribed dose anyhow) and think about if the benefit to me is worth the added risk.

Now I'm not so sure I want to take it. My saving grace is that I'm on the younger end and haven't taken it that long.

After reading the paper and looking into dosing I learned that I'm taking a tiny fraction of the normal dose. Wow. Learn something every day.

https://www.them.us/story/lilly-wachowski-work-in-progress-s...

I have to say that the one regarding the rule of thirds was... wrong. Thats always been a rule to break, and square isn't even close to a new format. Shooting 120 film in 6x6 is, and was, common. Its what the Apollo Astronauts took with them. Its also my favorite format.

Now I have a more capable rack, but it's all just running stuff I use. I don't experiment on it at all, and I don't use it to gain any new skills.

So I do call it a homelab, but its not quite what people understand that to be.

Seems he just doesn't have anything to update on some of the pages.

0: http://alaskaroads.com/roadgeek-superlatives.htm

Looks like the last update was in January 2014 though.

That gives us ~21MP for 35mm and 12MP for 50mm. The 35mm crop is almost a match for the sensor size of the Kodak, and the 50mm is smaller.

Then we have to deal with the inescapable processing that the iPhone does, even in "RAW" mode (which, while better than JPEG, is not anywhere near RAW). We are stuck with JPEG but no major processing on the Kodak, so no imagined detail.

We can compare lenses as well, but to do that properly I would need to do a like for like comparison. I may actually do that between the iPhone, Kodak, and Panasonic.

All in, your simplistic approximation just highlights how much you've bought into the marketing instead of understanding how cameras work.

Fond memories, I carried that camera all over the world for 6 years.

But a Kodak Pixpro FZ55 or FZ45. Brand new for $130 or less, beats even the best smartphones, and are Japan's top selling cameras for a reason.

The Panasonic 20/1.7 is an amazing little lens but its autofocus is absolutely horrible. I used to carry it and an E-M5 (the first one) and the shots were great but AF was near useless.

The iPhone can't even hope to touch the cheap Kodak, much less the actual mirrorless.

I shoot a Panasonic G9 II and thats a completely different level.

And thank you for YOUR data point that helped my son have the option to not do those extra months.