Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49586597

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49575887

Points: 12

# Comments: 3

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49561039

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

But the device only had 10 built-in levels. After a few days, we had solved them all. So I decided to make my own web version, expanding it to 44 unique layouts and making it accessible to anyone online.

That’s how Klotski.org was born — a browser-based puzzle platform focused on classic logic games, starting with Klotski.

Main features: 44 handcrafted levels, from beginner-friendly to extremely challenging. Tracks your moves and time, great for self-challenges or friendly competition. Works on both desktop and mobile, no installation required. Includes classic Huarong Dao, 15 Puzzle, and Number Klotski variations. Supported by ads to keep the platform running, without disrupting gameplay.

If you find some levels too hard, don’t worry — there’s also a built-in Klotski Solver that shows step-by-step optimal solutions. Still, I recommend trying to solve it yourself first — that “aha!” moment when you figure it out is the best part of the game.

How to play Move the red Cao Cao block (2×2) to the exit at the bottom center of the board (rows 4–5, columns 2–3) to win.

I’m sharing this here because I’d love to get feedback from the HN community: What do you think matters most for an online puzzle platform — level design, gameplay depth, or user experience? You can play it directly here: https://klotski.org/

Try a few levels and let me know which one stumped you the most, or what feature you’d like to see next.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45855279

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

1、If code generation eventually works without human intervention, and every Google search could theoretically produce a real-time, custom-generated page, does that mean we no longer need people to build websites at all? At that point, “web development” becomes more like intent-shaping rather than coding.

2、I’m also not convinced that chat is the ideal interface for users. Natural language feels flexible, but it can also be slow, ambiguous, and cognitively heavier than clicking a button. Maybe LLM-driven systems will need new UI models that blend conversation with more structured interaction, instead of assuming chat = the future.

Curious how others here think about those two points.

1. From “Writing Code” to “Solving Problems”: If coding becomes widespread, the role of programmers may shift from simply “writing code” to “solving complex problems.” Programmers will need to focus on understanding and addressing problems from a high-level perspective, applying technical solutions to real-world challenges.

2. AI and Creativity: While AI can generate code, it still lacks creativity and deep understanding. Programmers will play a crucial role in designing and guiding the architecture of complex systems, driving innovation, and developing unique products that meet market and user needs.

3. Quality and Security Gatekeepers: AI-generated code might contain bugs or fail to follow best practices. Programmers will be responsible for reviewing, optimizing, and ensuring the quality, security, and maintainability of code to prevent technical debt from piling up.

4. Trainers and Supervisors of AI: Although AI can generate code, it relies on training data and model optimization. Programmers will take on the role of overseeing AI, improving models, and ensuring AI-generated code meets quality standards and aligns with user requirements.

5. Connecting with User Needs: Programmers are not just tech experts, but also the bridge between technology and user needs. Even with AI automating code generation, programmers will remain essential in understanding and translating customer or business needs into effective technological solutions.

In a world where AI becomes more intelligent, how will the role of programmers evolve? How will they continue to hold irreplaceable value in the tech industry?

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45781980

Points: 2

# Comments: 4