<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: CommieBobDole</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=CommieBobDole</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 13:56:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=CommieBobDole" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Right, but that's still external to the LLM, it's just a KV cache that's stored on the provider side for performance reasons, so that the client doesn't have to re-send the whole chat history with every subsequent call in the conversation.<p>It still generates every response using the model's pristine state with every new API call; whether the context is provided from the client or from a colocated cache server doesn't really change that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 02:19:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392855</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392855</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48392855</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The fact that a LLM is essentially immutable would be my biggest argument against consciousness or self-awareness.<p>It's a big file with a bunch of coordinates describing spatial relationships between tokens. When you give it a prompt, it uses those relationships to generate a string of tokens that is a statistically likely response to that prompt, then it stops. It's not changed by the experience. It doesn't remember anything. It doesn't sit around thinking on its own.<p>Even if the model itself were extremely complex, it's hard to imagine a definition of consciousness that includes something that doesn't remember and can't change.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 21:04:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48390020</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48390020</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48390020</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "The Coming Layoffs and the Revenge of the Measurers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This article suffers from two things:<p>First and most importantly, it's not really about LLMs, it's about AGI, and the second does not necessarily follow from the first; LLMs in their current state are pretty clearly not AGI, and most of the LLM-world progression in the last few years has been about better tooling/interfaces, refinements in training data and techniques and people learning how to use LLMs effectively rather than the huge leaps in fundamental capability that we saw in earlier years. It seems more likely that at this point, when AGI comes, it will be something entirely new or something that LLMs are only a component of, rather than "we built an LLM with ten trillion parameters and suddenly it became God".<p>Second, it's not even really about AGI, it's about AGI superintelligence. And more than that, it's about affordable AGI superintelligence, assuming that such a thing won't cost billions a year to operate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 18:44:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270205</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270205</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270205</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Search engines alternatives now that Google isn't Google anymore"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've found that the AI overview is usually right but confidently wrong enough of the time that I don't trust it. The interface that you get with the 'AI Mode' button (which I assume is just Gemini with very low compute settings), however, is usually pretty solid for well-documented queries.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 17:24:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269298</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269298</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48269298</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Throwing AI-generated walls of text into conversations"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think this touches on the core difference between good and bad use of AI; using AI as part of the process vs cutting and pasting LLM output.<p>Use AI as part of the research process, to help understand a concept or problem. Use it to format data, or as a part of the design or brainstorming process. Use it to build manageable portions of code that you can read and understand before committing. But if the output doesn't go through your brain somehow before you unleash it on the world, that's really no different from a seventh-grader Googling the subject of his homework and then cutting and pasting the entire text of the first result, headers and all, and turning it in.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 14:39:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223444</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223444</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48223444</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Gemini randomly dumped its system prompt"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Was it the actual raw chain-of-thought? I know GPT-5 will emit thinking tokens, and while they're an interesting insight into the 'reasoning' process, they're apparently pretty heavily sanitized presumably because the raw thoughts could reveal proprietary training info that's part of their moat.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 14:04:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222784</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222784</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48222784</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "We let AIs run radio stations"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>lot of issues<p>The detailed stats page notes that the Grok station has played Sandstorm by Darude 228 times in the last 14 days.<p><a href="https://andonlabs.com/radio">https://andonlabs.com/radio</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 02:28:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188532</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188532</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48188532</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "AIs are not conscious, but most critics can't adequately explain why"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think the strongest argument against AI consciousness is that there's no persistent internal state, no feedback, and no change; the 'conversation' you're having is a series of one-off API calls where each subsequent call is provided enough information about the previous calls for it to generate a plausible response.<p>If we (very, very generously) assume that an LLM is a structure capable of conscious thought, then it's still not conscious - we've created a representation of a brain which we turn on for a fraction of a second to generate text and then return it to the representative state. There's no opportunity to develop consciousness, it's a brain trapped in stasis.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 13:45:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47287595</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47287595</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47287595</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "I'm reluctant to verify my identity or age for any online services"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When thinking about verifying your identity with a service, you have to ask yourself "what will be the impact to me if everything this service knows about me, every click I've made, everything I've watched/read/uploaded is posted publicly on the internet, attached to my full name, address and photo?". Because those are the very real stakes; if you verify with enough services, this will happen to you.<p>Weigh that against the value of using the service. A lot of times that will still probably come out in favor of using the service. Sometimes, especially given the kind of services that want age verification, the potential cost is such that you would be insane to verify.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47234448</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47234448</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47234448</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "AI agent opens a PR write a blogpost to shames the maintainer who closes it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Talking down to the LLM is anthropomorphizing it. It's misbehaving software that will not take advice or correction. Reject its bad contributions, delete its comments, ban it from the repo. If it persists, complain to or take legal action against the person who is running the software and is therefore morally and legally responsible for its actions.<p>Treat it just like you would someone running a script to spam your comments with garbage.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46989903</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46989903</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46989903</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Sumerian Star Map Recorded the Impact of an Asteroid (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"This trajectory explains why there is no crater at Köfels. The incoming angle was very low (six degrees) and means the asteroid clipped a mountain called Gamskogel above the town of Längenfeld, 11 kilometers from Köfels, and this caused the asteroid to explode before it reached its final impact point. As it traveled down the valley it became a fireball, around five kilometers in diameter"<p>This doesn't even make any sense. A 1km asteroid going many kilometers a second entered at a six degree angle, tore through hundreds of miles of atmosphere without burning up or breaking up, hit a mountain causing a landslide and only then turned into a 5km fireball and traveled down the valley (at a height of ~1500 meters above the valley floor) and just sort of evaporated?<p>I don't think physics works the way the author of this piece thinks physics works.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 15:07:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46837292</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46837292</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46837292</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Why I Love Cheap Coffee"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Honestly, a Moka Pot (which the author uses) might well be at the optimum point of effort vs quality for home coffeemaking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46771949</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46771949</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46771949</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Proof of Corn"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This isn't really an impressive test; growing corn is an extremely well-documented solved problem, the sort of thing that we already know LLMs excel at. An LLM that couldn't reliably tell you what to do at each step of the corn-farming process would be a very poor LLM.<p>This seems like something along the lines of "We know we can use Excel to calculate profit/loss for a Mexican restaurant, but will it work for a Tibetan-Indonesian fusion restaurant? Nobody's ever done that before!"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 19:46:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46736924</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46736924</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46736924</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Douglas Adams on the English–American cultural divide over "heroes""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What are birds?<p>We just don't know.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 21:43:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46725523</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46725523</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46725523</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "SETI@home is in hiberation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Apparently they are not completely finished with the project - according to this article from five days ago, there are still some signal candidates currently in the process of being re-observed with the FAST radio telescope.<p><a href="https://www.space.com/space-exploration/search-for-life/this-seti-program-is-chasing-down-its-final-100-signals-could-one-of-them-be-from-aliens" rel="nofollow">https://www.space.com/space-exploration/search-for-life/this...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 16:21:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46707809</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46707809</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46707809</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "The Dilbert Afterlife"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I read the whole thing and enjoyed both the premise and the writing, but yeah, it would have benefited considerably from the attention of a professional editor and a couple of rounds of rewrites.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 18:06:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46660324</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46660324</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46660324</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[OpenAI loses fight to keep ChatGPT logs secret in copyright case]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/openai-loses-fight-keep-chatgpt-logs-secret-copyright-case-2025-12-03/">https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/openai-loses-fight-keep-chatgpt-logs-secret-copyright-case-2025-12-03/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142082">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142082</a></p>
<p>Points: 12</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 00:06:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/openai-loses-fight-keep-chatgpt-logs-secret-copyright-case-2025-12-03/</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142082</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142082</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Ask HN: Hearing aid wearers, what's hot?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My 84 year old mom uses AirPods Pro 2 as an aid for moderate hearing loss and has been satisfied. As others have noted, the difference is night and day; I went from having to yell just to be occasionally understood to being able to have a normal conversation.<p>My understanding is they are pretty good hearing aids, but they don't have the battery life that purpose-built aids do (4-5 hours vs 18-24) so they're not optimal for full-time use. This is fine for her use case, since she only uses them when she wants to talk to someone, but could be an issue for someone who wants to wear them all day, every day.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 04:24:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46030373</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46030373</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46030373</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Why don't people return their shopping carts?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I question this assertion. What 'out of the way' exists in the parking lots you frequent? Every one that I can think of offhand consists of parking spaces, areas for people to walk from their cars, driving lanes and little else. Anywhere you could leave it other than the designated place is causing a problem for someone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 22:31:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45959156</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45959156</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45959156</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by CommieBobDole in "Some people can't see mental images"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Perhaps you suffer from D-G letterblindness.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:21:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45765525</link><dc:creator>CommieBobDole</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45765525</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45765525</guid></item></channel></rss>