Without direct browser support for WASM with DOM access ( and no need for JavaScript "shim"), all this is futile.

Amiga was smooth just as long as CPU usage was low and as long one used the stuff that its chipset could do.

And all that "smoothness" was useless once one got above what TV can do. I used PC for DOS Tango (schematic and PCB CAD) for example and even cheap Tseng ET-4000 card with 1MB would put Amiga to shame as it could do 1280x1024x16 colors.

Yes, animation speed wasn't great, but it worked. Two years later I had Diamond Stealth 2MB which could do 1600x1200x16 colors, running circles around anything any Amiga could do.

I remember going through a TON of pirated SW to get useful PCB CAD programs on Amiga (being the graphic "beast" of the time) and wasted a ton on non-PC harware (basically everything from Sinclair QL to Atari ST lines and Amigas, from 500 to 1200) only to admit defeat years later and settle on plain old DOS PC and Tango.

Amiga was ATROCIOUS for everything besides gaming. Its graphics was great only on paper - until you had it on the desk and havign to use it daily.

As anything Commodore ever did, Amiga was far overengineered for what it did.

That being said, there are only two Amigas worth remembering: - A500 as original one ( A1000 was overpriced crap) - A1200 as a cheap successor. Its upgrade value was "meh", but it was cheap. And there were games, actually using those extras. And it had a cheap HDD option (used an IDE drive).

Check the whole thread (RF BrainScan, biolabs etc): https://x.com/JDewarto61659/status/1889671237539930131

Here are couple more: "Black Organ trade harvesting across New EUgenic Empire, this time in Ukraine ?" https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1085rr0/black_o...

"NATO UKRAINIAN WHITE ANGEL'S AND PHOENIX CHILD TRAFFICKING OPERATION" https://x.com/RedpillDrifter/status/1895562771884097924

Bigger problem are insane EU taxes, regulation and upcoming chinese competition.

They also offer two other sensor LEGOs: one that looks like a previous/heaper gen (fp) and other with high-res 60+ MP sensor ("fp L").

I like the idea.

But I wonder how it compares to NILFS2. I tried that one a decade ago to make a bootable USB stick and it also worked great, eta least compared to ext4.

I know both are log-based and deep down NILFS2 makes different tradeoffs, which makes NILFS2 make longer for initial mount IIRC, but IIRC it was friendlier WRT wear&tear.

I wonder how do they compare now. I can't find anything even remotely current on the subject...

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42765295

Points: 1

# Comments: 0