> what if we could run only the relevant E2E tests

The real title should be "Using Claude Code to Reduce E2E Tests by 84%."

They should fucking learn how to code because no one in their right mind would depend on such an external service that can be easily replaced by cloning repos locally or using proxies like Artifactory. Even worse when you know that Microsoft is behind it.

Yes, most companies don't have good practices and suck at maintaining a basic infrastructure, but it doesn't mean GitHub is the center of the internet. It's only a stupid git server with PRs.

What about everyone having the same education? What about not putting capitalism in everything?

> without creating accounts or relying on any platform to keep it safe

You're still restricted to places where your JS decryption functions can be used. A novel idea would be to put both text and decryption inside a simple URL like a bookmarklet.

> The encryption method could be anything

Insecure then.

We failed at creating automation tools for the users (even if Apple tried that with AppleScript or Automator), but vibe coding throwaway scripts is not the answer.

Those are unacceptable to developers outside of the USA.

I don't use Google's products either. As for Microsoft and other big companies, they deserve the same hate.

It took me less than one day to switch from git.

False. You need to call `jj branch set -r@ XYX` manually which can be a PITA but you only need to do that once you push. Or there is `jj git push --named XYZ=@` which moves the branch.

And if you have conflicts, it's really easy to rebase and fix any issue.