2) Flight recorders weren't recovered until 2011

3) Manslaughter charges initially recommended in 2011

4) Accident report released in 2012

5) A long time with a lot of lawyers arguing about whether or not the charges should be heard in court

6) Charges dropped in 2019

7) However, public prosecutor announced proceeding with prosecution in 2021

8) Trial began in 2022

9) Both Airbus and AF acquitted in 2023

10) Prosecutor lodges an appeal in 2023

11) Trial begins in appeals court in 2025

12) Appeals court finds both companies guilty in 2026

Basically - these are two huge companies in France, they have a _lot_ of well paid lawyers, and a lot of political heft, but then there was a large amount of public outrage - and so the debate about whether or not to actually prosecute the case continued 2012 through to 2021 - the prosecutor reopening the charges in 2021 was due to intense public pressure.

Cruically once it actually went to trial, it only took 4 years to reach a conclusion including with appeals, which is quicker than I'd expect - and something I noticed is that the appeals court was able to find them guilty, I'm not sure how it goes in other common law country judiciaries, but in my country, if this had gone to an appeals court, they don't have the power to find you guilty, but they could overturn the previous ruling, and direct the lower court to begin the trial again - so it would have been even slower.

I guess that's an aspect of civil law judicial systems that might be considered an advantage.

I had far more hallucinations with 4.7 than 4.6.

I'll try it again after a few more months for them to get it right, but 4.6 is what changed my mind on LLMs as a tool, and 4.7 felt like a step backwards, so for now I'm sticking with something that has delivered me value, instead of arguing with a model ostensibly better that was making shit up 1 - 2 times a day. It was really disappointing.

I can give examples if needed, I screenshotted the most aggravating ones, but what worries me is which ones I didn't recognise.

I phrased it like that to try to convey the impact my snoring has on anyone near me.

When I got hunting or tramping, and intend to stay at a backcountry hut, I always carry my bivvy bag in case there's other people staying at the hut, if there are, I go sleep in my bivvy bag about 50m away from the hut.

Nothing like waking up and 20 other people all want to beat you.

Oh and it's so loud that I'm at risk of damaging my own hearing.

And I bounced off CPAP hard, no matter what I tried, I would eventually remove the mask in my sleep, it was heartbreaking, I was so excited to finally be able to fall asleep beside my wife.

I also tried the mouth guards and would wake up panicking and gagging.

So my only other option currently is self-funding expensive surgery (our public system doesn't fund treatment for severe snoring unless it causes apnoea, and my private health insurance excludes the most expensive portions shrug), which like all surgery, carries no guarantees of success, and also carries the risk that any general anaesthesia application does.

So this is awesome! I just hope it continues proving efficacious and safe.

Also, she looks like she was generated in the character creator from Oblivion.

But then there's rabbit starvation... https://web.archive.org/web/20090405155151/https://www.westo...

Hahaha, bless. I'm one of those people, I hunt, so I spend a lot of time out in the wilderness.

And if civilisation suddenly collapsed? My hunting and survival skills aren't going to do shit when I'm surrounded by thousands of other people who are competing for the same limited pool of resources. I might be able to identify the signs that a deer has browsed here recently, but so can many other people, and when we all turn up in the same forest looking for food en masse, well there's only so many deer a given area can support.

> Drop someone from humanity’s hunter-gatherer days into the same situation and they’d have a better chance of surviving than most contemporary humans.

Unfortunately, as the contemporary humans will likely resort to banditry to supplement their survival chances, your idealized hunter-gatherers are doomed to being stood over at best, murderered at worst.

I'm sure you'd agree that if I was advertising in the name of kids to raise money for a charity, and it happened to be that the particular charity I was raising money for had determines it should give Hamas money to help those kids, that potential donors would prefer to know where exactly their money was going to.

Oh, and it's even an example in that Wiki article you linked lol

> who asked us to clarify that the fish shell is not malware, it just feels that way sometimes.

And unrelated to shells...

> The author would like to remind stakeholders that the security team’s headcount request has been in the backlog since Q1 2023.

I also feel seen by this.

In a rental market with more supply than demand, having more efficient / cheaper heating is an advantage to attract tenants - but this kind of market in residential housing is typically rare these days.

Which is why governments need to enforce this by regulation, e.g., in my country landlords are required to meet insulation / heating / ventilation standards that often end up with their rental housing being better insulated and heated than the homes that the landlords live in themselves.

https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/healthy-homes/

If you own an older home and are renting it out, you'll often find that the heating capacity is too low for the modern standards, and in that case, a heat-pump is usually the most cost effective solution.

What also makes these standards work is that a lot of banks offer cheap loans for energy efficiency upgrades: for example https://www.anz.co.nz/personal/home-loans-mortgages/loan-typ...

As far as I understand, they're often not allowed to disclose that. E.g.,

https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/seeing-like-a-bank/

> In the specific case of “Why did the bank close my account, seemingly for no reason? Why will no one tell me anything about this? Why will no one take responsibility?”, the answer is frequently that the bank is following the law. As we’ve discussed previously, banks will frequently make the “independent” “commercial decision” to “exit the relationship” with a particular customer after that customer has had multiple Suspicious Activity Reports filed. SARs can (and sometimes must!) be filed for innocuous reasons and do not necessarily imply any sort of wrongdoing.

> SARs are secret, by regulation. See 12 CFR § 21.11(k)(1) from the Office of Comptroller of the Currency...