<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: F3nd0</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=F3nd0</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 20:17:48 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=F3nd0" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "Office.eu launches as Europe's sovereign office platform"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> there's nothing wrong with starting a business rebranding Nextcloud and keeping your development closed source, as long as you're honest about that, which this initiative is not.<p>I thought Nextcloud was released under the AGPL, making this very much <i>not</i> okay by default. So either I misunderstood something or Office.eu got a permission to make non-free modifications? (Going by what you said; I have not dived into this.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 21:29:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47392156</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47392156</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47392156</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "GIMP 3.2 released"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It seems like you can assign this action to Ctrl + S, yes. See here:<p><pre><code>    Edit → Keyboard Shortcuts → file → Overwrite […]
</code></pre>
I think this would be awful default behaviour, but I guess it’s nice to have the option if you really want it, and I was pleasantly surprised at how easy it was to find after reading your comment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 21:07:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47381172</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47381172</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47381172</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[GIMP 3.2 released]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.gimp.org/news/2026/03/14/gimp-3-2-released/">https://www.gimp.org/news/2026/03/14/gimp-3-2-released/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47380465">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47380465</a></p>
<p>Points: 247</p>
<p># Comments: 87</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2026 19:51:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.gimp.org/news/2026/03/14/gimp-3-2-released/</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47380465</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47380465</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "Plasma Bigscreen – 10-foot interface for KDE plasma"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What Photo app are you referring to? On Debian Trixie, I just get the screenshot app, Spectacle. It shows the screenshot it just took, tells me where it’s been saved, lets me do stuff with it, and lets me take another one. It could do with a facelift, but it’s fairly clear, really. I wonder if they changed it later or if the distribution you used deviated from the defaults.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47283471</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47283471</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47283471</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "F-Droid Board of Directors nominations 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My reading is they were simply trying to comply with regulations. It wasn't about what ideas they believed the religious texts were trying to convey, but whether their content met a certain definition set by law. The law could be poorly written, or it could be poorly and over-cautiously interpreted by F-Droid maintainers. But I didn't get the feeling they were acting on any kind of moral judgement or own belief about what's appropriate for children.<p>Does the Bible encourage violence or promiscuity? Not really, no. Does it mention and describe those things in some detail? Yes, absolutely. If that's the kind of content you need to remove from your store, then obviously you need to remove the Bible from your store. Whether that was really the case seems questionable at best, but the stated logic seemed pretty coherent to me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 18:41:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47183945</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47183945</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47183945</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "GNU Texmacs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It’s heavily inspired by both TeX and Emacs, hence why it’s named after both of those. As if the author had added the best aspects of the two and then some.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2026 22:52:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47159195</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47159195</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47159195</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "Emoji Design Convergence Review: 2018-2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I guess they could just support custom colours, but that seems like a needless complication—much like skin tones themselves.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 23:12:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831261</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831261</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831261</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "Emoji Design Convergence Review: 2018-2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why should the Simpsons hold any relevance to emoji?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 23:08:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831226</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831226</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46831226</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "Emoji Design Convergence Review: 2018-2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why should skin colour be specified at all? Why not leave it as an implementation detail? Yellow is the popular default choice, but it could very well be green, blue, pink, or anything really.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 18:30:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46828026</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46828026</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46828026</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "European Alternatives"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It seems like Taler has been coming along great and the biggest things it’s missing are more interest and adoption. There has been some first ‘real-world’ use recently, but it’s still far from becoming widespread, which would be a dream come true.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 23:48:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46739540</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46739540</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46739540</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "ISO PDF spec is getting Brotli – ~20 % smaller documents with no quality loss"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They don’t seem to provide a detailed comparison showing how each compression scheme fared at every task, but they do list (some of) their criteria and say they found Brotli the best of the bunch. I can’t tell if that’s a sensible conclusion or not, though. Maybe Brotli did better on code size or memory use?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 15:07:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46720166</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46720166</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46720166</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "ISO PDF spec is getting Brotli – ~20 % smaller documents with no quality loss"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Going by one of Brotli’s authors’ comment [1] on another post, it probably wouldn’t.<p>[1] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46035817">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46035817</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 14:43:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46719839</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46719839</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46719839</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "JPEG XL Test Page"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It seems to me this point of discussion always tends to get way too much focus. Should it really raise concern?<p>Of all the people who interact with image formats in some way, how many do even know what an image format is? How many even notice they’ve got different names? How many even give them any consideration? And out of those, how many are immediately going to think JPEG XL must be big, heavy and inefficient? And out of those, how many are going to stop there without considering that <i>maybe</i> the new image format could actually be pretty good? Sure, there might be some, but I really don’t think it’s a fraction of a significant size.<p>Moreover, how many people in said fraction are going to remember the name (and thus perhaps the format) far more easily by remembering it’s got such a stupid name?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 19:41:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710527</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46710527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "JPEG XL Test Page"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because JPEG XL is the first format to actually bring significant improvements across the board. In some aspects AVIF comes close, in others it falls far behind, and in some it can’t even compete. There’s just nothing else like JPEG XL and I think it deserves to be supported everywhere as a truly universal image codec.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 18:19:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709392</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709392</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709392</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "JPEG XL Test Page"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s an interesting speculation, but I’m inclined to believe their official reasoning. (That being they just didn’t really care about the format and/or went with whatever Chrome said at first. A year or so later they changed their mind and said they wanted an implementation in a memory-safe language, which prompted the JXL team to work on it.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2026 18:14:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709309</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709309</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46709309</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Critical analysis of digital euro published]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.taler.net/en/news/2026-02.html">https://www.taler.net/en/news/2026-02.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46620821">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46620821</a></p>
<p>Points: 5</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 18:57:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.taler.net/en/news/2026-02.html</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46620821</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46620821</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "XMPP and Metadata"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m not 100% sure on this in the case of AGPL, but I think you don’t need to relicense your project if you include AGPL code; you only need to make sure your project respects all the freedoms the AGPL requires it to (in a suitable way).<p>So your own code would still be under Apache, and people could follow only the Apache conditions if they only use your code. But combined with the APGL part, the project as a whole would of course have to follow the APGL conditions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 14:44:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46589193</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46589193</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46589193</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[P15 CoNetworkingSpace Accepts GNU Taler Payments in Swiss Francs]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.taler.net/en/news/2025-04.html">https://www.taler.net/en/news/2025-04.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46530643">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46530643</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 18:43:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.taler.net/en/news/2025-04.html</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46530643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46530643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "Why the trans flag emoji is the 5-codepoint sequence it is"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not a single dedicated, representative furry emoji that I'm aware of (unless we count 1F43E – paw prints), but there are a couple emoji which happen to be furry. In addition to the plethora of animal emoji (which aren't furry, but likely to be appreciated by furries), there are several emoji of cats with expressive faces (which do technically classify as furry), such as:<p>1F638 – grinning cat face with smiling eyes;
1F63B – smiling cat face with heart-shaped eyes;
1F63C – cat face with wry smile;
1F640 – weary cat face.<p>There was also the unofficial and very narrowly supported combination of ‘hacker cat’ and a few others:<p><a href="https://emojipedia.org/hacker-cat" rel="nofollow">https://emojipedia.org/hacker-cat</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 14:13:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526566</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526566</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526566</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by F3nd0 in "“Stop Designing Languages. Write Libraries Instead” (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Knowing that LLM’s have been extensively trained on public code, I wonder how much of it <i>is</i> based on Chromium or Firefox.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 13:54:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526378</link><dc:creator>F3nd0</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526378</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46526378</guid></item></channel></rss>