<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: FabHK</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=FabHK</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 23:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=FabHK" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "Spaghettifying DRAM"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Could someone ELI5 please? Context, achievement, scope, consequences?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 15:34:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49287582</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49287582</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49287582</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[More on Robotaxis]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://blog.dshr.org/2026/08/more-on-robotaxis.html">https://blog.dshr.org/2026/08/more-on-robotaxis.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49269363">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49269363</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 08:31:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://blog.dshr.org/2026/08/more-on-robotaxis.html</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49269363</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49269363</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "Tuxedo No. 2 – Cocktail recipes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Somewhat surprising that the Tuxedo cocktail is not on the list...<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuxedo_(cocktail)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuxedo_(cocktail)</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 09:26:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49241345</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49241345</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49241345</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "After Losses, Retail Investors Flock to 3x Leverage as 2x Product Are Restricted"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Seems to me that many people do not care about part 3 anymore.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 04:03:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49178443</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49178443</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49178443</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "After Losses, Retail Investors Flock to 3x Leverage as 2x Product Are Restricted"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The headline is brilliant.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 04:03:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49178438</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49178438</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49178438</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "After Losses, Retail Investors Flock to 3x Leverage as 2x Product Are Restricted"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed. It's so much bigger (in notional terms) than the underlying stock market that you can manipulate it by making large bets in the derivatives market, then move the underlying cash markets with much smaller bets, and collect profit.<p>That is what Jane Street (IIRC) was accused of. Some of its traders then went to another hedge fund and did the same trick there, reducing Jane Street's profit, and ended up being sued by Jane Street. (BTW, Jane Street claims it was not manipulation, but basis trade arbitrage.)<p>Of course, 9 out of 10 gambler end up in the red.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 04:02:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49178437</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49178437</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49178437</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "That time when I failed the Microsoft interview"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not binary. Each weighing can give you left, equal, right. So a ternary tree, if you want.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:16:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49170158</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49170158</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49170158</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "That time when I failed the Microsoft interview"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Exactly. Same kind of thinking gives you bounds on what can be done. For example, can you do 13 marbles in 3 weighings? 2<i>13 < 3^3, so maybe (though I think not). Can you do 14 marbles? 2</i>14 > 3^3, so definitely no.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:15:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49170152</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49170152</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49170152</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "That time when I failed the Microsoft interview"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Boat + bowling ball => level drops.<p>1) Imagine pushing the boat <i>down</i> into the lake, displacing water. The level would go <i>up</i>.<p>2) Imagine the ball instead of being in the boat, is attached under the boat by a rope. Same thing. (Imagine it magically moving through the bottom of the boat - it has no impact on the boat or water level).<p>3) Imagine you cut the rope. The ball will fall, and the boat will bob <i>up</i>. Water level goes <i>down.</i></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 15:04:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49169990</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49169990</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49169990</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "The myth of Snow Leopard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How about Mountain Lion vs Lion?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 05:22:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49151526</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49151526</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49151526</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "Deep-sea vehicles spot 'alien' sharks deep beneath the waves in the Pacific"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed. Until around 2021 or so, more people had been to the moon than to the bottom of the ocean (Challenger Deep).<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_Deep" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_Deep</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 11:55:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143642</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143642</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143642</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's because you get (particularly initially) quite some reduction of risk with little loss of expected return. Diversification (incl. across asset classes) is the only free lunch in finance.<p>If you want to argue that bonds and stocks have become more correlated, sure, but we do not know what hits us next.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 11:04:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143283</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143283</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49143283</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>BTW, you are correct technically that if the expected return of the investment is positive, then you maximise the expected return by putting in everything now all at once. However, maybe you want to reduce the variance. Or you want to trade off return and risk. Or you want to minimise regret.<p>If you put all in at a certain price, and later the market moves down, you'll regret that you didn't buy cheaper, and think you timed it badly.<p>If, however, you commit to a strategy of putting in say 5% per month over the next months, then a) you just automate it, and don't think about it anymore, and b) you don't really have a reference price at which you bought (sure, you can determine your actual cost basis, but who does that...) and thus avoid regret when the market tanks. Plus you reduce variance (by reducing the variance of your cost basis).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 07:36:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49142022</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49142022</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49142022</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "AI financial advice is surprisingly good, especially if you ask right questions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While banks often pay crap rates, real rates (e.g. from government bonds) have largely been positive (except the short end after GFC and COVID).<p><a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/REAINTRATREARAT10Y" rel="nofollow">https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/REAINTRATREARAT10Y</a><p><a href="https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/REAINTRATREARAT1YE" rel="nofollow">https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/REAINTRATREARAT1YE</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 07:28:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49141984</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49141984</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49141984</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "Elevators"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Wonder what would happen if the objective instead were to minimise sum of quadratic wait times (ie, penalise long waits explicitly).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2026 04:29:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49131042</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49131042</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49131042</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "UEFA and its national associations will not participate in FIFA competitions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Reminiscent of the resource curse, the observation that many countries "blessed" with an abundance of natural resources actually fare pretty badly (including lots of corruption).<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_curse</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 03:39:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49118731</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49118731</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49118731</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "Mythos attack on 3rd-round PQC algorithm candidate puts it out of commission"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>From the linked discussion (in which the withdrawal was announced) [0]:<p>Dear Colleagues,<p>This is a historic moment in cryptology: AI has beaten humans at cryptanalysis. We would like to share a few thoughts with the PQC community based on our own experience.<p>There are other dimension-reduction attacks on HAWK in literature. At Eurocrypt 2026, we proposed a dimension-halving algorithm for quaternion Ideal-SVP, which potentially implies that HAWK-n key recovery can be reduced to (cyclotomic) Ideal-SVP in dimension n:<p><a href="https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1448" rel="nofollow">https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1448</a><p>Later, we proposed another guessing attack based on advanced number theory, under a few heuristic assumptions:<p><a href="https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/1318" rel="nofollow">https://eprint.iacr.org/2026/1318</a><p>However, one of these heuristics was soon found to be invalid by colleagues with the assistance of AI.<p>Apparently, we were outpaced by AI in both cases. A couple of lessons we have learned are: (a) humans can make mistakes; and (b) humans are slower than AI. Beyond cryptanalysis itself, the use of AI to check mathematical proofs is becoming an increasingly serious issue.<p>One can even imagine a crisis in cryptography: in the worst-case scenario, all human-designed cryptosystems are broken by AI. Whether or not that happens, a new era—Post-AI Cryptography—has arrived.<p>Cong Ling<p>[0] <a href="https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/2r2u6SbHun4/m/JXBDCsVLBAAJ" rel="nofollow">https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/2r2u...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:12:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49112057</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49112057</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49112057</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "Apple's hostile App Store rating system"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple does prioritise their users even above their developers, fair enough.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:57:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099176</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099176</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099176</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "Apple's hostile App Store rating system"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> > Indeed, if ratings requests were initiated by Apple, then Apple could go as far as to ban developer-initiated ratings requests in the App Store.<p>> They did! It's a one-shot dialog now.<p>No. Apple provides an API, but Apple doesn't ask for reviews. The app has to initiate the process to ask for a review (through Apple's API). That is what the developer highlights: If Apple were to solicit reviews from customers, then said API could be retired and apps could reasonably be banned entirely from soliciting reviews. As it stands, they're caught in a tragedy of the commons, with unscrupulous developers winning (e.g. with fake reviews, or the annoying "are you satisfied" pop-up before displaying the Apple API).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:56:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099163</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099163</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099163</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by FabHK in "Apple's hostile App Store rating system"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I rate any app that nags (ie: more than thrice) me to rate it too.<p>Interesting. Apps can only ask three times a year (from Apple's documentation, my highlights):<p>"Asking for ratings and reviews<p>You can ask users to rate and review your app at appropriate times throughout the user experience. Make the request when users are most likely to feel satisfaction with your app, such as when they’ve completed an action, level, or task. Make sure not to interrupt their activity.
The SKStoreReviewController API lets you give users an easy way to provide feedback about your app. <i>You can prompt for ratings up to three times in a 365-day period."</i><p><a href="https://developer.apple.com/app-store/ratings-and-reviews/" rel="nofollow">https://developer.apple.com/app-store/ratings-and-reviews/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 15:50:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099061</link><dc:creator>FabHK</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099061</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49099061</guid></item></channel></rss>