<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Flavius</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Flavius</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 13:04:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Flavius" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "Show HN: Sycamore – next gen Rust web UI library using fine-grained reactivity"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Read the Book" button, next gen web UI. That's all you need to know about this one.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 17:18:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603750</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603750</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47603750</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "The risk of AI isn't making us lazy, but making "lazy" look productive"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>By asking it to cite its sources. Whenever I use AI, I have it pull direct quotes from the text to justify its interpretation. Sometimes it's spot on, sometimes it's wrong. But skimming a paper to fact-check a few specific quotes is still vastly faster than reading a dense paper completely blind.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 19:19:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557436</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557436</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47557436</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "Opera: Rewind The Web to 1996 (Opera at 30)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That sure took a lot of work for something that nobody's gonna watch.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 09:44:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500395</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500395</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47500395</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "Are LLMs not getting better?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> This means llms have not improved in their programming abilities for over a year. Isn’t that wild? Why is nobody talking about this?<p>Because it's not true. They have improved tremendously in the last year, but it looks like they've hit a wall in the last 3 months. Still seeing some improvements but mostly in skills and token use optimization.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:31:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349677</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349677</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349677</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "AI doesn't replace white collar work"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>AI won’t replace all white collar work. Just like the tractor didn't replace all farmers, only about 98% of them. The real question is: what's next? When farming automated, those workers eventually filled our factories and offices. When the offices automate, where do they go? Back to farming?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 20:25:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47301042</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47301042</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47301042</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "BMW Group to deploy humanoid robots in production in Germany for the first time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh, absolutely. Because history clearly shows that when multi-billion dollar corporations save money on labor, they immediately pass those savings directly to the consumer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 22:23:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47254819</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47254819</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47254819</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Full Linux on any Android (No Root) [video]]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyDQmfeRXQc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyDQmfeRXQc</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47205381">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47205381</a></p>
<p>Points: 5</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 10:15:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PyDQmfeRXQc</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47205381</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47205381</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "LibreOffice blasts OnlyOffice for working with Microsoft to lock users in"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What do you mean by version 7.0? I'm running Version: 26.2.0.3 and it still looks dated after I did my best to configure the interface.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 11:27:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099774</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099774</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099774</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "LibreOffice blasts OnlyOffice for working with Microsoft to lock users in"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Take a look at these screenshots: <a href="https://libreoffice.en.uptodown.com/mac" rel="nofollow">https://libreoffice.en.uptodown.com/mac</a><p>It looks ancient, worse than office apps from 20 years ago.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 10:23:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099350</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099350</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099350</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "LibreOffice blasts OnlyOffice for working with Microsoft to lock users in"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The 'fake open-source' debate is interesting, but OnlyOffice is still the best free alternative for anyone coming from MS Office. LibreOffice has a great mission, but their UI feels dated and the formatting issues with DOCX/XLSX files are still a deal-breaker for me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 09:48:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099124</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099124</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47099124</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "99% of adults over 40 have shoulder "abnormalities" on an MRI, study finds"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You call it "abnormality", I call it evolution. We are not the same.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 19:30:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47065196</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47065196</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47065196</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "News publishers limit Internet Archive access due to AI scraping concerns"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed. It’s mostly just disposable clickbait masquerading as journalism at this point. Outside of feeding people's FOMO, there's little content worth preserving for history.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 19:39:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017606</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017606</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47017606</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "I'm not worried about AI job loss"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe you should be a little worried. A healthy fear never killed anyone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2026 19:36:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47006786</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47006786</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47006786</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "ClawHub"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Zero. If a skill actually provides value, one of two things happens: it gets absorbed into Claude Code (or similar) within a week, or a company packages it up and charges real money for it. The "free skill that gives you an edge" window is essentially nonexistent. By the time you find it, everyone else has it too. You're better off learning to prompt well against raw API docs than chasing a library of pre-built skills that are either trivial to recreate or about to be made redundant.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 18:08:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46964152</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46964152</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46964152</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "AI doesn’t reduce work, it intensifies it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That’s a simplistic take. Displacement isn't about being "dumb", it's about unit economics. A company will replace a brilliant person with a good enough AI if it costs 10% of the salary. The "smart" people who are keeping their jobs are exactly the ones Simon is talking about. They’re being "forced" to work more to prove their value against a machine that never sleeps. That’s the intensification.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 12:42:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46958955</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46958955</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46958955</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "AI doesn’t reduce work, it intensifies it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This intensification is really a symptom of the race to the bottom. It only feels 'exhausting' for people who don't want to lose their job or business to an agent; for everyone else, the AI is just an excuse to do less.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 11:32:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46958322</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46958322</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46958322</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "The first sodium-ion battery EV is a winter range monster"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Retaining 90% range at -40°C sounds like a game changer, almost too good to be true. I'm definitely going to need to see some third-party real-world range tests to validate those claims before getting too excited.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2026 18:14:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936930</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936930</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46936930</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "How vibe coding is killing open source"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Open Source isn't a tech stack or a specific way of typing syntax, it’s an ideology. It’s the belief that knowledge and tools should be free to share, study and modify. You cannot kill an idea. Whether I write a function by hand or 'vibe' it into existence with an LLM, the act of liberating that code for others to use remains the same.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 20:35:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46876904</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46876904</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46876904</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "Rentahuman – The Meatspace Layer for AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>How do you verify that the human on the other side is not an agent as well?<p>Spoiler alert: you don't or you can't.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 13:02:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46870475</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46870475</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46870475</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Flavius in "English professors double down on requiring printed copies of readings"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That friction is trivial. You are comparing the effort of snapping a photo against the effort of actually reading and analyzing a text. If anyone chooses to read the paper, it's because they actually want to read it, not because using AI was too much hassle.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2026 17:15:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46847621</link><dc:creator>Flavius</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46847621</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46847621</guid></item></channel></rss>