You can also…turn it off.

Chrome silently elected people into it _and_ downloaded the model without asking because they decided that’s something they (chrome) fancied doing.

The difference should be pretty obvious.

They’re saying that the emoji usage is telling them that very little effort was put into the PR and that they’ll treat it accordingly.

The solution is just to spin up the machinery you need for your solution, rather than making S3 cover all possible bases.

Or you’re getting the model to do the polishing, thereby developing no skills of your own, and we’re back to the start.

You would be appalled at the kind of stuff I have seen teams stuff into parquet and iceberg tables.

S3 is an object store. Treat it more like a KV store. As other comments have pointed out, the solution here is pick-your-favourite-metadata-store, be it Postgres, or what iceberg does, and other data on S3.

This pre-supposes the idea that the business is _willing_ to let that happen, which is increasingly unlikely. The current, widespread attitude amongst stakeholders is “who cares, get the model to fix it and move on”.

At least, when we wrote code by hand, needing to fix things by hand was a forcing function: one that now, from the business perspective, no longer exists.

They should also accommodate my need for all POSIX filesystem API’s included cheap-moves and renames!!!!!

/s

They’re basically the only reason I’m there.

You could achieve things yourself if you tried!

I can’t prove it, but I just know they’re the ones who live their lives one NPS score at a time, and must think that we operate our software, being thankful for every custom animation that they force us to sit through on their otherwise broken and unimportant software.

I have a pair of Hunt wheels and they work fantastically, bonus points because they are “always on”, pedestrians are aware of them, but are never surprised.

> Thought for 7.5 million years

You’re asserting that people who are tired of this line being wheeled out hold a position analogous to “what’s the big deal, nothing bad happens, just relax”. In reality, that’s only 1 position. The other position is “I understand fully, the consequences, but the relentless doomer language is tiring in the face of continuing-to-not-eventuate”.

I shouldn’t have to say this out loud, but if the environment collapses, we will die, and no amount of “just a bit more scaling bro, just think of the gains” will matter.

This isn’t exactly a mystery problem, we’ve understood clearly how to educate humans well for quite a while. It’s just that doing it properly is “eXpEnSiVe” as if the alternative, isn’t quietly orders of magnitude worse, and more costly.