<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: GeekyBear</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=GeekyBear</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 01:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=GeekyBear" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Felony charges for citizen deleting phone data at US Border"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> For exactly the border search scenario, I wish smartphones could be imaged and restored as easily as PCs.<p>You're always been able to backup and restore your iPhone to your local Windows PC or a Mac using free first party software from Apple.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 21:18:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49393910</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49393910</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49393910</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "The Mojo language (by Modular, now Qualcomm) is now open-source"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also Clang and OpenCL.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49363743</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49363743</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49363743</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> it's got all the limitations of Manifest V3 which prevents it from doing a good bit of blocking<p>The only mainstream browser left that can still run the full version of uBlock Origin is Firefox.<p>All the others have the same limitations imposed by Manifest V3.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:26:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321462</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321462</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321462</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Firefox is now the last major browser that still supports uBlock Origin"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Firefox is also the only browser that vets uBlock's code on every update to make sure the developer hasn't inserted spyware or malware into the extension.<p>They don't do it for every extension, but they do so for a wide selection of popular options.<p>> Recommended extensions differ from other extensions that are regularly reviewed by Firefox staff in that they are curated extensions that meet the highest standards of security, functionality and user experience. After receiving Recommended status, safety standards are maintained through automated checks, monitoring, and periodic technical reviews<p><a href="https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/recommended-extensions-program" rel="nofollow">https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/recommended-extensions-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 22:12:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305222</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305222</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305222</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "France's top court blocks social media ban for under-15s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> 1. These platforms are highly addictive<p>So block them.<p>> 2. Many parents are themselves addicted and don't understand the harms or choose to ignore them<p>People are allowed to make choices others find objectionable.<p>> 3. Even children who don't use social media can be harmed by these platforms.<p>Bullying predates social networking and happens even without internet access.<p>> You already have no privacy online<p>If EVERYONE has to submit an ID before they are allowed to communicate on the internet, it becomes a much more dystopian world.<p>Stop trying to control EVERYONE and educate parents on existing tools that are available to protect their own children, if they choose to use them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 21:09:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304631</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304631</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304631</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "France's top court blocks social media ban for under-15s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Both Android and iOS allow parents to block social media apps and web access to individual websites or the entire web, if they choose to do so.<p>That's not a fantasy.<p>It's also a much less restrictive option than forcing EVERYONE to give up their privacy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304207</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304207</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304207</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "France's top court blocks social media ban for under-15s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Parents already have the ability to control what their children can do on their personal devices.<p>It would be better to use public resources to educate parents on how to use those existing controls, if that is something those parents choose to do with their own children.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304019</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304019</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49304019</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Run Android ARM64 VR APKs on Apple Vision Pro"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It was originally more of a historical artifact of all of the tooling being deeply steeped in Apple's own tech stack.<p>I would say that it is tied to an institutional memory of what can go wrong when your platform depends on third party development tools.<p>Back in the classic Mac OS days, most developers used a compiler toolchain (Codewarrior) and application framework (PowerPlant) from a company called Metroworks.<p>They were bought by Motorola and those products were discontinued leaving developers in a bind.<p>After that, Apple decided that they needed to offer their own first party development tools.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:33:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49247781</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49247781</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49247781</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Run Android ARM64 VR APKs on Apple Vision Pro"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I guarantee you somewhere in their backlog is an item that says "require app store for app installations on macOS"<p>Apple isn't the company that has already attempted to lock their PC operating system to only accept apps from an app store.<p>That's Microsoft with both WindowsRT and Windows S.<p>Just because the first attempt failed in the marketplace and Microsoft backed down on the second doesn't mean they haven't already tried to  lock Windows to only run app store apps multiple times.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 17:59:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49247309</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49247309</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49247309</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "The Alpha 21264 CPU: NT's Greatest RISC (1998)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>He was my favorite author at Byte.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 16:27:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232886</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232886</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232886</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Can Intel finally beat ARM on performance per Watt?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They have finally prioritized buying leading edge Fab technology over stock buybacks, so their design team finally has a chance.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 15:22:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232265</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232265</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232265</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Can Intel finally beat ARM on performance per Watt?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Until Intel is capable of  making a fanless laptop chip that also has industry leading single core performance, they aren't in the same ballpark.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 14:58:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232018</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232018</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49232018</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Can Intel finally beat ARM on performance per Watt?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Efficiency is one thing.<p>Efficiency and performance is another.<p>We've long known that pushing clock speeds results in diminishing efficiency, so it's about time we see Intel stop pushing the clocks (and power) so hard that the chip melts down and the battery drains quickly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 19:14:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49224921</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49224921</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49224921</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Hardware backdoors in some x86 CPUs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> This backdoor only appears on decades-old VIA C3 embedded x86 processors<p>Modern Intel and AMD chips also have separate CPU cores that neither the user nor the installed OS control.<p>Intel Management Engine:<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine</a><p>AMD Platform Security Processor:<p><a href="https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Platform_Security_Processor" rel="nofollow">https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Platform_Security_Process...</a><p>Intel added them in 2008. AMD followed suit about five years later.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 16:42:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49223427</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49223427</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49223427</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Hardware backdoors in some x86 CPUs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Intel chips also have a hardware backdoor in the form of a separate core that the neither the user nor the installed operating system control.<p>Intel Management Engine:<p><a href="https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine" rel="nofollow">https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Management_Engine</a><p>As do AMD chips:<p>AMD Platform Security Processor:<p><a href="https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Platform_Security_Processor" rel="nofollow">https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Platform_Security_Process...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2026 16:27:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49223280</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49223280</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49223280</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Getting 25 Gbps Thunderbolt Ethernet on My Mac Studio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fixed, thanks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 19:02:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49127300</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49127300</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49127300</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "Getting 25 Gbps Thunderbolt Ethernet on My Mac Studio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As mentioned in the blog post's footnote, the bottleneck may just be on the NAS side:<p>> this real-world speed limitation could also be related to my use of my lower-power Arm NAS (running on Ampere Altra, with 32 fairly-slow CPU cores). I was testing writing to an array of fast enterprise NVMe SSDs, so they shouldn't be the bottleneck here.<p>He was only getting 1 Gigabyte of throughput out of the built in 10 Gigabit Ethernet connection and moving to the 25 Gigabit connection only made a marginal impact on throughput, after all.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49127069</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49127069</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49127069</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "The American Grilled Cheese Sandwich Essay (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Rye bread, cheddar, and a 50/50 mix of butter and bacon grease in the pan.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 05:01:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49119187</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49119187</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49119187</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>WindowsRT and Windows S were already attempts to lock down Windows to only allow apps from an app store.<p>Secure Boot initially didn't allow the install of operating systems other than Windows.<p>Microsoft is the company continually attempting to lock down their general purpose computers, not Apple.<p>...and no. Microsoft backing down aftet consumers revolt doesn't mean their attempts don't count.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 15:27:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49111367</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49111367</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49111367</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by GeekyBear in "About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"You can delay this update for a little while" simply isn't the same thing as "you still have full control over updates".<p>It's right up there with Microsoft's "you are not allowed to turn telemetry all the way off", or all the efforts to require the use of an online Microsoft account to access your own computer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:30:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101230</link><dc:creator>GeekyBear</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101230</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49101230</guid></item></channel></rss>