<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Geniuzz</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Geniuzz</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 10:12:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Geniuzz" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geniuzz in "We've raised $17M to build what comes after Git"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t understand the negative sentiment here.<p>What’s the problem?<p>Do you think less money should be going into VC?<p>Just some numbers ~1.5M housing units are built in the US with an approx cost of $300k - $400k. That is $450B to $600B going into housing units construction every year.<p>On the other hand VC has maybe $1T AUM in the US. Maybe 10%-20% of that is deployed every year? So $100b to $200B.<p>What is wrong with that ratio? Could there be better solutions to make more housing cheaper? (lower regulations, efficient permitting, etc)<p>Money moving from VC to housing seems without a first principled approach on what problem your solving and how is silly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:06:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718390</link><dc:creator>Geniuzz</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718390</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718390</guid></item></channel></rss>