<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Geo_ge</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Geo_ge</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 13:29:39 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Geo_ge" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geo_ge in "The Physics of GPS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Decreased vertical precision is an artefact of measurement geometry more than e.g. number of frequencies.<p>Horizontal position has the benefit of having satellites at almost all azimuths. But the vertical position estimate only gets satellites from at most half of possible elevations (above the horizon).<p>See "Vertical Dilution of Precision":<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilution_of_precision" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilution_of_precision</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 17:26:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742205</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742205</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47742205</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geo_ge in "How Passive Radar Works"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is a lot of talk of military uses here, but this technique is also used for environmental monitoring.<p>GNSS interferometric reflectometry (GNSS-IR) uses navigation satellites as the transmitter for a bi-static radar. The measurement device is any GNSS receiver (even your phone).<p>The technique can estimate environmental parameters like sea level, soil moisture, snow depth, and vegetation water content from systematic changes in the the multi-path around the antenna.<p>There is an open source Python package for this technique: <a href="https://github.com/kristinemlarson/gnssrefl" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/kristinemlarson/gnssrefl</a><p>An introductory paper "The Accidental Tide Gauge": <a href="https://www.kristinelarson.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/LarsonIEEE_2013.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.kristinelarson.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/La...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 14:12:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730798</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730798</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47730798</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Advanced Astrology Software for Windows]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.halloran.com/dlwin.htm">https://www.halloran.com/dlwin.htm</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47277491">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47277491</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 16:50:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.halloran.com/dlwin.htm</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47277491</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47277491</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Earth's Rotation Limits IBIS Performance to 6.3 Stops]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://thecentercolumn.com/2020/01/17/earths-rotation-limits-ibis-performance-to-6-3-stops/">https://thecentercolumn.com/2020/01/17/earths-rotation-limits-ibis-performance-to-6-3-stops/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46751133">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46751133</a></p>
<p>Points: 5</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2026 05:46:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://thecentercolumn.com/2020/01/17/earths-rotation-limits-ibis-performance-to-6-3-stops/</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46751133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46751133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geo_ge in "HydroGNSS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh wow, cool to see this on HN!<p>I'm a postgraduate researcher working on GNSS interferometric reflectometry (GNSS-IR), a related but slightly different technique.<p>I'll shout out this awesome open source project, where you can use GNSS-IR and your own RINEX files to measure tides or soil moisture around your antenna: <a href="https://gnssrefl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/" rel="nofollow">https://gnssrefl.readthedocs.io/en/latest/</a><p>(Your antenna needs to be near the sea or bare soil, respectively)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:07:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45951712</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45951712</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45951712</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geo_ge in "NASA's Guardian Tsunami Detection Tech Catches Wave in Real Time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You've got exactly the right idea, except "cross compare" is underselling it :)<p>Here's a previous thread on this topic[0].<p>For each (receiver, satellite) pair, you can calculate the TEC along the signal propagation path by comparing the time of flight of two carrier waves (e.g. L1 and L2)[1].<p>By fusing the data from each line of sight together you can get a rough, real time, 3D (4D) model of the ionosphere. Then, you have a separate problem of identifying ionospheric anomalies in the model and relating them to phenomena like earthquakes.<p>[0] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42441772">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42441772</a>
[1] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42471052">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42471052</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 06:23:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45258689</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45258689</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45258689</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geo_ge in "A simple way to generate random points on a sphere"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe a global Moran's I test?<p><a href="https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moran%27s_I" rel="nofollow">https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moran%27s_I</a><p>Create the spatial weights matrix with great circle distances?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 01:51:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45009475</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45009475</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45009475</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Air traffic control outage disrupts flight in Oceanic airspace]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/multiple-australia-bound-flights-circling-off-new-zealand-reports-airpace-closed/H66PWKMGNFDA5CDH2CF7EWSI3U/">https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/multiple-australia-bound-flights-circling-off-new-zealand-reports-airpace-closed/H66PWKMGNFDA5CDH2CF7EWSI3U/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44921003">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44921003</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 07:14:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/multiple-australia-bound-flights-circling-off-new-zealand-reports-airpace-closed/H66PWKMGNFDA5CDH2CF7EWSI3U/</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44921003</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44921003</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geo_ge in "Show HN: High-resolution surface analysis with Lidar data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Aerial survey LiDAR can process multiple returns from a single laser pulse. So, some energy might be reflected back from a leaf, but some energy will pass through (or around) the leaf, hit the ground, then reflect back to the sensor. Some systems can record 5+ points from a single laser pulse.<p>With this information, you can filter the point cloud to only include points from the final return, which is likely to be the ground/a solid surface unless the vegetation is very dense.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 12:28:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080643</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geo_ge in "Show HN: High-resolution surface analysis with Lidar data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A raw point cloud is run through a series of processing steps to label each point with a class, e.g. "Ground", "Low/Medium/High Vegetation", "Building", "Transmission Tower", etc.<p><a href="https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/manage-data/las-dataset/lidar-point-classification.htm" rel="nofollow">https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/manage-data/las-...</a><p>There will be a different algorithm for each feature class. For example, points that are part of a building might be identified by finding groups of points that form a very flat surface. ML models can also do this based on training data.<p><a href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/3d-analyst/classify-las-building.htm" rel="nofollow">https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/3d-a...</a><p>The final digital elevation model (DEM) is then just taking the "Ground" class from the classified point cloud and using them to triangulate a surface. This differs from a digital surface model (DSM), which will triangulate a surface based on ground+building+vegetation points.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 11:09:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080287</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080287</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44080287</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geo_ge in "Raspberry Pi Modems"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I went through a similar process recently while building a solar powered Raspberry-Pi based GNSS receiver.<p>(like the OP) I originally looked at a very low power/speed GPIO modem, but it wasn't very stable and not really suitable for what I needed.<p>I ended up with a SIM7600G-H-M2 4G HAT on a Raspberry Pi 3b+: <a href="https://www.waveshare.com/wiki/SIM7600G-H-M2_4G_HAT" rel="nofollow">https://www.waveshare.com/wiki/SIM7600G-H-M2_4G_HAT</a><p>It's a bit pricer but very capable and well documented. There is a physical switch to enable power input for the modem over a separate USB to the data connection, so the power for transmission can bypass the Pi electronics.<p>After fiddling with the first modem for hours, this one was working in less than 5 minutes with RNDIS: <a href="https://www.waveshare.com/wiki/Raspberry_Pi_networked_via_RNDIS" rel="nofollow">https://www.waveshare.com/wiki/Raspberry_Pi_networked_via_RN...</a><p>I noticed during testing that the 4G connection would sometimes drop and require manual intervention to reset... So I added a systemd timer to test the connection and bring the interface down/up again whenever it disconnects. No problems since then, now with two months of uptime with ~200MB upload per day :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2025 09:58:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44079987</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44079987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44079987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Geo_ge in "Internet in a Box"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm running a Raspberry Pi based GNSS receiver from a 26 Ah SLA battery and an 80W panel. Just passed 2 weeks of uptime in a cloudy period of southern hemisphere autumn.<p>A monte carlo simulation using historical conditions said it had a ~95% chance of no downtime over 3 winter months. A slightly larger battery would bring that up to 99%.<p>The Pi (3b+), GNSS reciever (u-blox ZED F9P), and Waveshare 7600G 4G modem average about 3.5W idle. The GNSS reciever is about 0.1 - 0.2 W of that. Wifi would be more energy efficient, I imagine.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 04:50:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43817674</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43817674</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43817674</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[End of an era: Landsat 7 mission takes final images]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/end-era-historic-landsat-7-mission-takes-final-images">https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/end-era-historic-landsat-7-mission-takes-final-images</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41663465">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41663465</a></p>
<p>Points: 273</p>
<p># Comments: 48</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 21:13:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/end-era-historic-landsat-7-mission-takes-final-images</link><dc:creator>Geo_ge</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41663465</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41663465</guid></item></channel></rss>