I didn't say it would have been possible without ANY coal but you do understand that the amount of co2 we put into our atmosphere is not from 1760? All of that big huge co2 output happend in the last 100 year...

Solar plus batterie is currently winning. In germany the problem again is NOT the economy, its literaly the energy provider companies being slow as hell. This critisim is circling the media now for the last few years.

China is doing hydro, gas and coal because China is gigantic and they don't mind that coal still exists and we do not know yet at all how their end energy mix will look like but they are pushing very hard for renewable.

No as i told you, a lot of people around me literlaly don't want to do reneable for the reasons i told you. A L'ot of people DO NOT CARE about climate change.

Germany is trying to push for heatpumps in the old government, the new/current one is paddling back, AGAIN. This is happening under our noses. The discussion of the new heating law (from the prev government) created A LOT of controversy.

The main reason why the renewable energy transformation is happening at the current speed and not in the possible speed, is people not math. not economy.

We have protests against wind mills because they 'look ugly'. My neighbours hate my solar panel on the balcony but can't say something against it because the old government created a law for this.

Work collegues of mine hate EVs and don't want to switch over but my company only allows EVs since this year. Multily of them complained that an EV is not usable as a daily car while i own an EV for 4.5 years now and it is usable as a daily driver.

The transition in China is significanlty faster than in Europe.

Russia has power because of their nuclear arsenal which is unclear how well it is maintained.

But no we can fill up and build faster and better than russia.

And the war against ukraine is hurting russia now for over 1000 days. Russia even has to go so far to reduce mobile and internet. This alone hurts Russia as a whole.

My statement still stands, we do not need to increase defence spending to beat russia.

You said something different though: "We need to increase defence spending to have as little as human risk as possible".

I wouldn't call it naive, more optimistic. And even before Ukraine, we do have military. EU has high tec military.

Even before Ukraine, the EU spend more in military than Russia.

And regarding resources for Ukraine: We do fight a proxy war. We are not fighting Russia directly. This means some people don't want to spend money and resources on this, we are nog aligned across europe and it is always very unclear how and how much we help. This would look differently if russia would declare war against the EU.

You have a client, the client uses the SDK, talks to endpoint x. Endpoint x tells it very efficient that they are now talking protobuf and rpc over quick or http15 and thats it.

Why don't we have this? Right because of people.

Its always people problem.

MCP is now here, it might stay.

I would think educating people properly is good, I also think the swizz model is good in sense of everyone learns to handle a gun and can have it at home (as long as high security standards are set and its taken very serious).

It could be used as a tool to strengthen societies responsibility, communication and combined with what the THW is doing (technical help org).

But my statment is still true:

We do not have to catch up. We are absolutly capable of defending ourselfs against the current biggest threat which is Russia.

At that time we still lived and heated normally. For sure the brits destroyed a lot of their trees but you know? They could.

What do you think would have happened if we had a small population collaps at that time and HAD to consume sustainable? We would be less people for sure, but we wouldn't have killed the missing people, they would have not been created in the first place.

We created the first solar panel 1883. The first EV in 1884.

China is still using coal because they are in the same dilemma as we all are: we ignored the impact and keep the status quo. But China build a lot of coal plants for renewing aging ones and they are massivle building out solar.

So why are my neighbours not doing it? Man i talked to sooooo many people about this, are you ready? Because people don't care. Or they don't like new things. Or they don't understand why it would be better.

Yes thats the conspiricy. People can't do the math, don't care about climate change or just don't want something to change.

Everyone i know who has solar panels on the roof, a small battery and heat pump literlay saving money and would never switch back. Every single one of them.

In his FCC filling he also mentions DCs:

https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-26-113A1.pdf

And yes its absolutly wild.

His Scifi ideas are probably a min of 100 years too early.

And while he doesn't even need his own compute (renting out colossus 1 and 2), he thinks we will send server racks full of expensive hardware into space in no time.

Why?

Because his Space-X Trillion evaluation doesn't make sense if he doens't has payload for Starship.

So how much payload do we send to space? Actually not that much, starlink itself is the biggest change by far. So he builds Starship which he needs for starlink v3 but what then? Yeah Datacenter in space...

Just to be very clear about Starship: We have a very limited amount of payload we are sending up in space every year.

The biggest jump in payload is starlink itself. Starlink though doesn't scale very well. V2 can only handle a certain amount of customers and has only a lifetime of 5 years.

Space-X has to build Starship to even being able to send v3 up to increase the margin of this setup. But even then, every 5 years that thing has to be replaced and new build.

Every mobile tower, fiber cable etc. underground has a lot higher lifetime than that.

Starlink also has the issue of latency handover. Every few minutes you have to do a handover which leads to package loss. I can't do a Teams Call through Starlink fyi.

And Starlink already exists and is relativly affordable despite that, they only have 9-10 Million customers and they had to increase the price.

And while all of this 'magic no one gets' is happening, Starship hasn't profen non leo orbit with proper payload AND reusability. Without reusability, they will not get the costs down that much anymore. Its already relativly cheap.

And in parallel all of this 'trillion dollar future margin magic' gets opposition by other companies like eutelsat and Amazon.

Ah yes the world changing product of starlink mobile. Which doesn't get booked in the USA, is slow and needs a lot of energy. Whatever you think this is, 500km mobile range is 500km and this on a planet were normal people already have a very very well working mobile setup for at least 10 years by now.

Is space-x some kind of business gap? yes sure. Will they make billions with this? Depending on other companes, yeah sure. Is it a trillion dollar business? No

Yes yes i'm fully unaware of this.

Btw. Musk def sells you the story of Mars and dyson sphere and stuff to keep the magic but while he does all of this, he rents out colossus 1 and 2 to his competitors because he is unable to sell his OWN AI product.

Its a gamble.

The current evaluation of Tesla is still higher than real car companies + robot companies + robot taxi companies.

The amount of military spending europe has, is already higher than russia.

Russia clearly showed how incapable they are, they are not even able to present modern war technology at their freedom parade.

And china we don't fight china.

We have everything to switch over and while we do nothing more and more people are affacted by it daily and in longterm.

co2 is in the athmosphere for a long time.

In the only world were this is true, is a purely capitalistic society which values poorer people less.

There is also no value in this. If we owuldn't known about progress through oil and gas, who would say that we would be unable to get to the same point just a 100 years later?

No own would be hurt if we would have achieved this 100 years later but healthier.

It was also ignored on purpose. Oil companies knew very well, researchers knew. Apparently there were big demonstrations here in germany in the 70ties so our parents knew too.

Life came inbetween apparently.

And from a pure calculation point of view: Its actually very easy to switch over to renewable. As of today, we do have everything we need.

The only thing missing is people doing it.

And just to be clear: it would repay itself.

This is a subsidie.

Wind and solar are cheaper than fossil fuels this is absolutly true. Plenty of people around me have solar panels on the roof, a heatpump and energy storage. They are independent of any oil company like shell (who earned great thanks to the oil shortage?!).

Your argument regarding cost was borderline a few years ago and it might still be borderline in countries were oil is very cheap and we still ignore any ecological impact and responsiblity but overall no oil is more expensive.

Btw. just that you are aware of: A Heatpump can make out of 1 energy unit gas more energy. A EV engine has an efficency ov 95-99%.

So everyone who just burns gas directly (ICE or heating at home) is wasting energy.

It would be more efficient if you would make that oil/gas into energy, use the process heat of it for remote heating and use the elictricty directly in an EV or for a heatpump.

In another comment they mention that there is some kind of mechanism of sometimes showing new in the overview. But besides that, its filtered

I would replace that person in a heart beat tbh.

And when I look back, i can list a handful of people of top of my head which I would replace for these tokens too.

People today don't ask other people what 'time saving tipps' they have, you google and checkout some influencer etc.

I also have never asked some friends about their camping trip ideas. I use tripadvisor, or similiar things. My mom does it the same way and the rest of my family (all non it people).

He uses some hyperbole for the marriage proposal text but lets be honest, if a person is using that instead of trying it themselves, they wouldn't have tried it themselves anyway.

I also take pictures, you know how it felt already 10 years ago when people compared your pictures to evyerone else pictures? This train has departed. Everyone did red color key pictures, had their B/W phase etc.

How much time do we all actually sit in front of screens? Why are we discussiong this on hn? I don't know you, you don't know me. You don't care who i'm as a person.

My comment is genuin and its true.