RIP dude, we’d continue the jokes, may your soul laughs as hard as we do.

Chuck Norris once bet 42 is a prime. He won.

Let’s hope one of these fake AI grifters doesn’t take this as a serious idea, raised a couple hundred million, and do real damage.

(I’m not against AI, I just don’t like nonsense either in tech, or people)

Question about this:

“Threads are positioned in the timeline by the original post’s created_at; replies within a thread are sorted by their own created_at ascending.”

Does this mean, I, as the person replying to the post can manipulate my reply time to say, 3 minutes before person X’s reply?

If so, I can imagine a few adversarial ways of (ab)using this.

I understand this is more for friend groups, just curious if my understanding is correct.

> The concept itself doesn’t even make sense if you fully understand the intersectional scope of technology and society Societies demands are the things that are unsafe not the technologies themselves

Where can I learn more about it?

Everything I find by searching is marketing BS, or the same half-baked prompt injection protection that only works for cherry picked problems.

Really need some help here finding the right communities.

This made me lol.

It's a good test, however, I wouldn't ask it in a public setting lol, you have to ask them in a more private chat - at least for me, I'm not gonna talk bad about a massive org (ISC2) knowing that tons of managers and execs swear by them, but if you ask for my personal opinion in a more relaxed setting (and I do trust you to some extent), then you'll get a more nuanced and different answer.

Same test works for CEH. If they felt insulted and angry, they get an A+ (joking...?).

A few things help a lot (for BOTH sides - which is weird to say as the two sides should be US vs Threat Actors, but anyway):

1. Detach your identity from your ideas or work. You're not your work. An idea is just a passerby thought that you grabbed out of thin air, you can let it go the same way you grabbed it.

2. Always look for opportunities to create a dialogue. Learn from anyone and anything. Elevate everyone around you.

3. Instead of constantly looking for reasons why you're right, go with "why am I wrong?", It breaks tunnel vision faster than anything else.

Asking questions isn't an attack. Criticizing a design or implementation isn't criticizing you.

Thank you,

One of the "security people".

Imagine you, as a security researcher (or any other persona in the security field), wanted to see what prior works are available around bypassing v8 sandbox using webasm, or if what’s been done or found targeting deserialization in Go.

Using this web app, you can search the indexed and tagged write ups.

Also adding MCP support to it so your agents can search too.

Hopefully going live soon.

P.S: I said HN-like, but tbh it’s just the UI that looks a bit like HN (I’m not a good designer, so got heavy inspiration from HN listing style), otherwise there’s no other overlap in functionality yet.

A few things come to mind (it's late here, so apologies in advance if they're trivial and not thought through):

- Threat Actors compromising an account and use it to Vouch for another account. I have a "hunch" it could fly under the radar, though admittedly I can't see how it would be different from another rogue commit by the compromised account (hence the hunch).

- Threat actors creating fake chains of trust, working the human factor by creating fake personas and inflating stats on Github to create (fake) credibility (like how number of likes on a video can cause other people to like or not, I've noticed I may not like a video if it has a low count which I would've if it had millions - could this be applied here somehow with the threat actor's inflated repo stats?)

- Can I use this to perform a Contribution-DDOS against a specific person?

This is a tasteless copy.

Maybe we can break out of it by giving who ever is taking accountability if that thing goes wrong a tie breaker vote, or have their votes weigh a bit more?

Glad you’re feeling better and got your vision back.

This is definitely a horrible experience to have.

You said “between shoulder blades”, was that where they inserted the needle? Mine was way down the spine (near the end)

As Seneca said, I suffered more in imagination than reality in this case.