<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Grimblewald</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Grimblewald</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:19:35 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Grimblewald" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "Cybersecurity researchers aren't happy about the guardrails on Anthropic's Fable"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wear a few hats, but as a chemist and I'm not happy with fable. As a statistician I'm not happy with fable. As a data scientist I am not happy with fable. As an academic and a researcher I am not happy with fable. It's useless. I'd be surprised if anyone can get any output from it that couldn't easily be replaced with a search from wikipedia. Given how verbose claude models have become, wiki articles are probably less verbose too, and the tok/s is unmatched for a wiki article pull.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 01:03:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484979</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484979</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484979</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "Apple bets cheaper AI will woo small developers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>yeah, but gemma models are shit, objectively speaking. I've been building edge AI tools for my lab group, and gemma lineage hallucinates so much it cannot be used at all. We're almost exclusively using qwen models. Given no image with a prompt for OCR to a gemma model, it'll make things up even if told to null fields not present. Qwen will a) follow instructions (placing things not clearly legible into a dedicated 'notes' field), return null for missing items, and get some pretty wild OCR tasks done quite well. It's almost got the opposite problem, I've had to limit how quickly people can submit an OCR ingested label to the DB because people started trusting it to never make mistakes, while gemma required correction on nearly every scan because of things it made up. So gemma didn't win on tok/s, accuracy, grounding of answers, etc. Theres no conceivable spot where it wins, and this was for qwen-vl:4b vs gemma e4b, so qwen model is 1/3 of the size, runs faster, and is far more reliable. So what does gemma really bring to the table?<p>It's not the cheapest, its worse than cheaper options, etc. All it really brings is the google label.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 01:00:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484959</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484959</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48484959</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "US publishers tell Common Crawl to stop scraping and delete archive"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Its like they don't understand the problem common crawl solved rather  neatly. You think the skid scrapers are bad? Wait till the competent players lose access to CC.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:37:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462521</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462521</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48462521</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "Apple bets cheaper AI will woo small developers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cheaper isn't as much of a problem as functional.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:12:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454337</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454337</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454337</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "Show HN: Gitdot – a better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>FAQ point 5 is pure comedy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:10:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454312</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454312</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454312</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "Show HN: Gitdot – A better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Bit odd it was missing at all. Makes me wonder how well the core infrastructure you're building on is understood, and how trustworthy any of this really is. If all I'm getting is some vibeslop, with zero expertise or skill added, even basic stuff like this, why shouldnt I just vibe my own better version tailored to my needs exactly? Same headaches as with your app (though likely less give  what's on display), only now I dont pay you to give me headaches and I retain control.<p>The software was never the moat. The skills and experience crystalised within it was, and remains, the product.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:05:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454257</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454257</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454257</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "Show HN: Gitdot – a better GitHub. Open-source, written in Rust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>1. It's unfinished
2. Textbook slop dump and run<p>we can see one big initial push, not too suspect. Then a few superficial updates, and then nothing for months.<p>Unfinished, broken, and ostentiably abandond due to being an unmaintaible nightmare as vibeslop tends to be.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 23:57:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454181</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454181</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48454181</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "It's Not Just X. It's Y"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Burden of proof that ai tools aren't dogshit isn't really on me, so pipe down and use a more reasonable register you pissant. This site, even this thread is filled with evidence. You're in no position to demand anything, especially not something apparently demanded in bad faith. A request for info I'd be happy to meet, but not this.<p>There are many cases out there of people proving that it does happen. I have personal text not published that do trigger all detectors between 70-100% AI depending on the tool. I wont be sharing these, as "providers" of these "tools" would simply add it to training data and continue to merrily overfit.<p>Bottom line, transformers regress to the mean like many other models, if you as a person produce output aligned with mean of corpus, you'll trigger detection. More importantly, evading detectors is trivial. Find a corpus of text from an author, get an llm to write a note on style, parlance, habits in writing etc. and then use that voice file to drive outputs from an llm. If the source text didnt register as AI, the new ai output also reliably avoids detection.<p>So my problem is, detection doesnt work, false positives are fact, so these tools at best offer harm.<p>A bigger problem¸ undermining your request for proof beyond that which many before me, and including me, burned in an effort to make folks see reason, is that even if i handed you proof on a silver platter you wouldnt understand it. If you could, you'd already understand, because the problem and the math are quite simple. Every example text i've offered in the past now registers 100% human, but many I kept to myself continue to show the same problem, and that never changed. So why would I waste my few remaining tools for sanity checking, when all i can expect from that endevour is losing a tool and shifting nothing in the conversation? No, best I keep that to myself for now.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 04:55:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421528</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421528</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421528</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "Artificial intelligence is not conscious – Ted Chiang"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Always with this topic of articles I find a common theme. No one defines the load-bearing terms and just assumes we all mean the same thing by it, which we know is not the case. That lack of engagement with the topic always has the same effect: the few interesting things said, if any, dont apply to the subject matter claimed generally. Its more of an insight into the authors mind, than the claimed topic. Why can't we all just do the more effective thing, and offer our personal definition for what constitutes conciousness, which is the only thing these articles offer. It would save so much time and make discussion far clearer.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 23:15:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48405959</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48405959</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48405959</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "I built a vulnerable app and spent $1,500 seeing if LLMs could hack it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've had some really dumb refusals. Explaining elements of infrared specteoscopy, researching aritifical bud-breaking in agriculture, etc. Anything interesting and non-mainstream is banned. Basically, restricted to answers i'm better of just going to wikipedia for.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 11:35:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397194</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397194</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48397194</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "It's Not Just X. It's Y"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Double should map to endash, tripple for em.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 23:17:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350771</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350771</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350771</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "It's Not Just X. It's Y"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Alternatively, no one sounds like an llm, an llm sounds like someone, typically those close to the median of the training corpus. If AI were genuinly capable of novelty, it would be a big deal, tech bros having enough work ethic to design new detectable prose for an llm is a mssive reach and has no real evidence supporting it, else why do tech bros only tackle the easier issues? Things we have massive well labelled corpi for? Why is it never dishwashing and folding laundry?<p>I put to you, if you see a trope in AI writing it's because that trope appeared in the training corpus. Therefore, sure, being predjudice against it lets you catch some AI, but you'll also flag human outout. I think that may not be worth it in the end.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2026 23:15:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350747</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350747</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48350747</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "Prolific Wikipedia editors are threatening to go on strike"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, they've mostly left reddit as well, afaik. It's a few stragglers, people being paid to push agenda, and auto-moderation now. I was reading / moderating reddit for over 4 hours a day, every day, for close to a decade. Heavy handed pro israeli censorship and propaganda has seen me pick up and leave, as i know many others have done. I was already wavering, over reddit's support of astroturfing and shill bots which were obvious, detectable, and reddit refused to do anything about it. Even actively supported it. So with the whole denying /actively supporting genocide thing, it was time to hang it up and leave.<p>If wikipedia is shutting off avenues for community input, maybe that is running it's course as well.<p>Its been nice internet, I loved you, and I will never forgive google for what they put into motion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 02:58:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332043</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332043</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48332043</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "Claude Opus 4.8"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I maintian a log of tasks, prompts, related information etc. So i can repeat past workflows verbatim, and I can qualitatively say each model beyond 4.5 has been a regression, and it would not surprise me 4.8 continues the trend. Each iteration has failed at more tasks previously completed succesfully. Right now it flat out refuses to answer many benign chemistry questions, or leans into shilling to hard and ignores non industry funded studies on certain topics. I'm transitioning to deepseek as a reuslt. Cheaper by far and at this stage not strictly speaking less capable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 00:07:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317279</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317279</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317279</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "What Apple and Google are doing to push notifications"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your position is that of any normal human. Google is committed to evil however, just look at how playstore notifications are tied to sales spam. Want payment notifivations? Gotta take the ads as well, not seperate toggles, one toggle. Drink liquid shit you tech peasant. Oh? this hostility drove you to f-droid? We'll unilaterally decide every device r belong to us, so we can disable competition we dont approve of. Welcome back to the liquid shit trough, peasant.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:37:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302716</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302716</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302716</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "DuckDuckGo search saw 28% more visits after Google said people love AI mode"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>AI is like sex. I don't mind it, heck in the right situation I'm quite partial to it. However, if you keep trying to sneak it on me while I sleep, keep trying to slip it into agreements, keep involving people i didnt consent to being involved etc. The whole thing takes on a very ugly vibe. In fact I'm going to grow to be quite hostile toward it. Consent matters, not that I'd expect that lesson to land within silicon valley, second most rapey place in the USA after LA.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:28:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302666</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302666</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48302666</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "GPT Guesses Between 1 and 100"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>6*7=42</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 23:32:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273115</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273115</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48273115</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "When does learning from data work (math starting from basic probability)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unit word per unit meaning is lower than average human, far lower than average technically capable human, the 'hallucinations'/'mistakes' like you said, overall composition and thoughlessness in visual presentation etc. This is unlikely to have seen a human co-author beyond quick skim/scroll.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 23:18:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272991</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272991</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272991</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "When does learning from data work (math starting from basic probability)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't mean to be rude, but this reads like 0 human oversight Ai slop</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2026 03:31:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254087</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254087</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48254087</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Grimblewald in "A digital billboard company has the technology to make 3D ads on moving trucks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If I find myself in a jury panel for someone who took a hammer to these, I already know im voting not guilty, and recommending they get keys to the city.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 23:08:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173949</link><dc:creator>Grimblewald</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173949</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173949</guid></item></channel></rss>