In any system, I suspect it is possible. There are strategies that allow doing private set intersections (or similar): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_set_intersection (i.e. a set with one member is "you", and you can check to see if you're in that 764, without knowing who the others are)

I'm not sure what strategies would also allow you to not reveal to the vote collectors where your vote went, but there might be something.

An effective strategy for lots of higher tier management. For both good and bad reasons - often they don't want the details, they want to know that you know the details. You're being paid to know those details, after all.

Anything optional that skims off the top cuts into profits extremely quickly.

Your only gains would come from whatever increased surface area the system has, radiating energy however it can. But a radiator without any water involved would be as good or better. Air-cooled datacenters do exist, they're just trading other costs and usually can't release as much heat.

The only "secure" stuff I see in there is for local AI stuff, encrypted folders, and securely managing other devices. Nothing at all about hardware security or updates or anything that Google has been adding to Android (which imo they're fair to claim! but nearly none do).

iPhones are similar: https://www.apple.com/iphone-18-pro/ they have a small card to see Apple's general privacy policy near the bottom, but other mentions are stuff on the level of "it supports WiFi with passwords".

While there's tons about AI, cameras, and speed. Because those sell better.

Which is far beyond "a trend" and approaching "a truism" for phone sales pages. I challenge you to show even a single large-market-share phone sales page that makes a device security claim (niche ones do! but they're niche), outside Pixels. The very first one I visited demonstrated my point just fine, as did the second.

---

Pixels actually do make some claims ("7 years of updates", Titan chip, etc https://store.google.com/product/pixel_11_pro?hl=en-US) and Graphene routinely holds them up as the sole manufacturer doing a good job (now hopefully two manufacturers, for at least some products). Others really do stand out starkly against even that ankle-high bar.

They can be fun, but I and almost everyone that I'm friends with much prefer to simply visit and hang out with no plans at all. Just be there, maybe chat a bit, maybe ignore each other and read a book for a few hours, maybe find something to eat / do a lightweight potluck. Which rather sucked that COVID ended up shutting down almost all of our communal places to visit for that.

And while the go.sum file in a module is returned by proxy.golang.org (somewhat surprisingly), that only includes the module's dependencies, not itself. So you're still stuck trusting a goproxy to serve you the correct data.

The numbers aren't zero, certainly. Nor does it imply directly proportional levels of effort. But they are incredibly obviously given wholly different levels of attention on nearly all phones, by nearly all phone manufacturers.

OSM-rendering apps are a fair bit more computationally-expensive than many apps, so I do expect them to show the allocator's cost more, but OsmAnd stands out quite starkly against every other app on my phone.

I suspect the model might just be too small? Which makes sense when exposing it for free, but it's still a bad experience.