Likely the difference is court costs.

Why do you think it is so common to hear horror stories about gym memberships?

But in your example no one agreed to the contract which means no agreement exists.

Generally you can say that payment was agreement to terms but that doesn't work if you deceived to get the payment.

I am not talking about common sense I am talking about things like informed consent and consideration.

Like even in the abstract "here is what a voting sheet would look like" that isn't meaningfully more complex.

To be clear I think it is a hard problem and so far is the biggest detractor to alternative voting schemes.

However given all that I agree with your point that it is a meaningful path forward.

How do you enforce court rulings?

We shouldn't be ignorant of how the violence is committed and restrictions should be numerous and enforced for sure.

But presuming a meaningful government that cannot commit violence can exist is unrealistic.

If you say government control is bad in general you are just saying there shouldn't be government.

This is impossible as the things the government does will happen it would just be under a different label.

That is all I meant by non-sensical, you need to be more specific to have a real point.

Don't say "government involvement is bad" specify what exactly you mean.

This weird hyper politicization is young in terms of the US.

And again you don't acknowledge that "government control" is too vague a metric to be useful.

The government has some form of control by virtue of existing so if you want to be critical of it you need to be more specific.

Generally those kind of scams setup an illegitimate transaction that would be reversed in a court case.

Whether they rise to a criminal matter is complicated but the vast majority of such scams hold up to scrutiny and instead rely on shell games to make retrieving your funds to expensive to be possible.

On the other hand I don't know a solve for every bill having less than a handful of votes that are bipartisan...

After all the federal budget is so large because you can swap states but you can't get away from the IRS.

Hell as much as the drone strikes get simplified down to "Obama killed people without trials" the main complaint at the time was that he was acting without Congressional approval.

Democrats shouldn't have responded to Congress getting blocked up by Republicans realizing that they could make "ineffective government" a self fulfilling prophecy but pretending everyone is okay with it isn't accurate either.

You can be critical of the policy of export controls and the meaning of them in modern day but saying it is a problem with the government in general is nonsensical.

E.g. foo(//long function call\n\t//more parameters)

After all B2B transactions are often invoice based.

I was quite clear you are presupposing it is better without actually justifying that.

"Some standard is better than no standard" isn't generally true, it has some requirements.

Tabs vs spaces don't matter they are equivalent.

But consistency is only better when it is an improvement.

It is fundamentally important that convential commit is better for adopting it to be an improvement.

After all in your example wasting the first four characters of your commits with poop would objectively reduce the quality of your commit history, whether or not it was consistent.

In what context does wasting your first characters on fix vs feat matter?

PRs are going to have an explanation that has way more detail than necessary to figure that out quickly.

One lines tend to be (for me) in a situation where the difference is immaterial. If I am rapid firing through history I need to know what you did not why you did it.

Again I am not claiming that these are bad or even that they aren't good.

I am specifically disagreeing that any change is automatically good, that isn't true.

If I am pushing a PR with a working combination and rebasing after upstream merges how is jj changing the flow?

Hopefully you have perfect CI coverage since you didn't bother to compile your PR even.