<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: Hauthorn</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=Hauthorn</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 02:19:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=Hauthorn" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Hauthorn in "Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is in fact not how a chess engine works. It has an evaluation function that assigns a numerical value (score) based on a number of factors (material advantage, king "safety", pawn structure etc).<p>These heuristics are certainly "good enough" that Stockfish is able to beat the strongest humans, but it's rarely possible for a chess engine to determine if a position results in mate.<p>I guess the question is whether we can write a good enough objective function that would encapsulate all the relevant attributes of "good code".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 12:27:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43914786</link><dc:creator>Hauthorn</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43914786</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43914786</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Hauthorn in "Vacheron Constantin breaks the world record for most complicated wristwatch"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think watchmakers have been pushing this for quite a while.<p>If you want more recent examples, see Richard Mille.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 08:10:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43662405</link><dc:creator>Hauthorn</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43662405</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43662405</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Hauthorn in "The case against conversational interfaces"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think you work in different domains.<p>Expecting a good outcome is different from expecting to get exactly what you intended.<p>Formal specifications are useful in some lines of work and for some projects, less so for others.<p>Wicked problems would be one example where formal specs are impossible by definition.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 09:19:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43544573</link><dc:creator>Hauthorn</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43544573</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43544573</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Hauthorn in "S1: The $6 R1 Competitor?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe this is a capability that the Switchblade 600 or STM KARGU already has.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STM_Kargu" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STM_Kargu</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 13:48:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42948442</link><dc:creator>Hauthorn</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42948442</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42948442</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by Hauthorn in "Facebook engineers: we have no idea where we keep all your personal data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or maybe just implying that Meta isn't up for the task of complying with GDPR, and lack the necessary ability to comply with regulations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 14:17:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32750953</link><dc:creator>Hauthorn</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32750953</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32750953</guid></item></channel></rss>