I would prefer just a one-sentence summary of what it is and one-line header explanations for comment topics to point me to the right place in the discussion.

In general, in my opinion, this is more useful as a navigation aid to help me quickly judge whether the discussion is interesting than as a replacement for the original text. But it could be way too out of scope for this tool. (I wish something like that existed for scientific peer-review journals...).

But communist solved most of the problems that prewar Poland would have problem of solving. Yeah Polish tech was amazing especially if you consider the resources

Its enough to go the wiki (both about the computer and the inventor) to see that the situation was not that clear. The performance was greatly overstated, it depended on the import of the component from the west etc.

Moreover the guy was cooperating with the Polish version of the FBI so it's not like it was a story of lonely genius vs the governament....

I would say it's just because they are allowed to do so and EU open market kinda enforce that.

Bioinfo tools? You scrape the surface of the reported results and see what is inside and a lot of stuff is either broken or work on a trust me bro principle.

Sequencing? In one technology results can be a bit different depending on the graphic card used and reported error rate is kinda shady.

Don't get me wrong people working with these stuff are amazing but the constant push for publishing more and more and the profit drive of the companies does a lot of bad stuff.

I am wishing them the best but I would be shocked if it drags me out of my ESS Emacs corner.

Like I write a super messy barely coherent paragraph and ask LLM to streamline the text and make it easy to understand while avoiding the LLMs grandiose language. Obviously it needs some corrections but it's way faster than normal.

Also just to shorten a longer text or even reformat the text accordingly to some direction.Like to convert daily notes to proper zettelkasten ones.

Like NHS with their post covid data due to excel limitations or gene name conversion problems in sci journals.

Same happens with stupid amount of laboratory management things or bioinformatics tools.

Honestly obviously the article is biased but we should at least think about moving away from csv in non customer facing fronts.

Small files? Json Big files? SQLlite or parquet.

Rstudio is nice but lacks a lot of nice things from something bigger.

These models left unchecked like they are now could be really dangerous. Increased use in articles will results propagating harmful stereotypes(unconsciously as Midjourney is easier to use than browsing the stock images), the enforcement of western(Anglo-Saxon) viewpoints in other countries.

Also it's just simplifying life to the easiest, most basic common denominator. I honestly think that there is no added value for them to exists.

It's a myth that is problematic because even Germans started to belive in and it's holding it back. German rail is in horrible state, internet speed is a joke, banking system is ancient and you still have problems with paying with cards. Also dealing with even simple stuff require a crazy amount of documentation and personal visit for no good reason.

And the worst part is that due the German mentality and their feel that their are the greatest nothing will be improved and any insight from abroad used. Their approach is always just "Well what can we or oh it's definitely the best system".

Germany is the best in marketing and eating the benefits of the previous generations.

And I am not buying the argument about the this could enable people to move to the "real" stuff we have the same arguments in case of violent video games, movies and music.

But Jesus live and people are sometimes disturbing.

Resulting in the collapse of the public one or, at best, cutting costs and reducing commuter lines from smaller towns/villages.