<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: HerroRygar</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=HerroRygar</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:52:46 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=HerroRygar" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HerroRygar in "Lets Talk; An EventBus in Backbone.js"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's interesting...I can't believe I never noticed that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:27:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3848359</link><dc:creator>HerroRygar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3848359</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3848359</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HerroRygar in "Lets Talk; An EventBus in Backbone.js"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I also had this exact problem. I posted this question on StackOverflow about it, and the accepted answer led me to the solution I use now, which is identical to the one described in the article:<p><a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9405148/how-can-i-bubble-up-events-in-a-backbone-view-hierarchy" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9405148/how-can-i-bubble-...</a><p>...I always just do something along the lines of window.MyAppNamespace.EventProxy = _.extend({}, Backbone.Events);<p>The nice thing about this tactic is that it loosely couples interactions between your views. A coworker who also uses Backbone.js prefers passing references between your views to each other. Although this makes the code easier to read in some cases, since it's more obvious what the flow of control is, it tightly couples the components.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:01:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3848206</link><dc:creator>HerroRygar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3848206</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3848206</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HerroRygar in "Light Table - a new IDE concept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This looks fantastic! It also has the side effect of making me want to get back in to learning Clojure. The idea of the file not being the fundamental unit of code is especially intriguing, but hard to wrap my brain around - that's such a low-level, base assumption that it's difficult to picture truly challenging that.<p>What are some examples of other paradigm-shifting (argh, buzzword) ideas in the world of software development? Deviations from the norm often become the new norm, and I'm too young and inexperienced (I've only been out of college for 10 months) to remember the "old way" of things.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:12:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3838883</link><dc:creator>HerroRygar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3838883</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3838883</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HerroRygar in "PHP: A fractal of bad design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I seem to remember reading that Facebook was using XHP, which allowed XML literals. That would certainly be an improvement over "warts-and-all PHP", in my opinion.<p>Of course, I'll trust what an actual engineer from Facebook is saying over some article that I can't even cite. Is this not the case?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:14:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3824169</link><dc:creator>HerroRygar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3824169</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3824169</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HerroRygar in "PHP: A fractal of bad design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Everyone is certainly entitled to their opinions, but I'm puzzled as to whether some of the people claiming that PHP's greatest strength is its deployment model have had significant PHP experience?<p>As with most things, it's both good and bad. It IS fantastic that you can so easily toss a .php file into a directory, make a few minor Apache config adjustments, and BAM - dynamic website behavior.<p>...that's also a glaring weakness, though, when a complex application is developed without the structure imposed by other tools. I have to maintain an event registration system written in PHP, and I'm having incredible difficulty with it. The logic to store form data, look for errors, display the current form, and prepare the form for submission are all in a single, 1000+ lines spaghetti-code file.<p>I think the author's point (and certainly the one I'm making) is not that this is the only possible outcome of writing in PHP, or that other languages do not have this problem. Rather, the point is that the lack of cohesive structure removes barriers to writing bad code; in fact, it makes it (initially) easier than writing good code.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 20:07:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3824136</link><dc:creator>HerroRygar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3824136</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3824136</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HerroRygar in "PHP: A fractal of bad design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a CoffeScript-ification of PHP called Snow. You can see it here:<p><a href="http://code.google.com/p/php-snow/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/php-snow/</a><p>Frameworks definitely help a lot. I've done a little work with FuelPHP, and I found that to be pretty pleasant.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:55:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3824066</link><dc:creator>HerroRygar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3824066</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3824066</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HerroRygar in "Ace - Sinatra for Node with Fibers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Quoted from the documentation: "Every request is wrapped in a Node Fiber".<p>So...essentially, this behaves like a traditional web server? A process listens for incoming connections, then spins up a new process/thread/fiber to handle the request?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:37:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3594899</link><dc:creator>HerroRygar</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3594899</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3594899</guid></item></channel></rss>