It sounds interesting at a glance, but it seems to be AI slop. So it's hard to tell if there are any interesting discoveries there, or just some worthless results described with performatively advanced language.

Despite the similar names, these are two very different technologies. QD-OLED is a OLED panel that uses QD (quantum dots) to achieve a wide color gamut. QLED is a LED backlit LCD panel that uses QD in a similar way.

The difference in performance characteristics of these two panel types is dominated by the difference between OLED and LCD.

unsloth and byteshape are just using and highlighting features that have been available the whole time. I am very invested in figuring out a solution to this dispute, or some way to get the new quants upstreamed.

If you just take the most probable token every time, the system becomes fully deterministic. We don't do this as the output becomes more stiff and less creative.

They also present the cameraman as a token skeptic, who is of course quickly swayed into belief.

They lean heavily on a host of tricks with long histories of non-reproduction when tested rigorously.

A "scientist" (known crackpot and woo believer) is employed to make the experiments sound. And their terrible academic reputation was explained away using conspiratorial arguments.

I found TT wholly unconvincing and consider it a scam to get people to pay for the actual evidence. I won't pay of course and confidently assume it to be poor based on the publicly available material.

Think about why langchain has dozens of adapters that are all targeting services that describe themselves as OAI compatible, Llamafile included.

I'd bet you could point some of them at Llamafile and get structured outputs.

Note that they can be made 100% reliable when done properly. They're not done properly in this article.

It will regularly use it and reliably when asked to.