<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: HybridStatAnim8</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=HybridStatAnim8</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 02:17:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=HybridStatAnim8" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The security features are not niche, you are claiming that arbitrarily. The needed hardware security features are generic and industry standard, OEMs are just lazy and choose to ignore such improvements.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:36:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972221</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972221</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972221</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>GrapheneOS is not obsessed with google. Other OEMs have simply failed to reach the needed hardware securuty requirements, which will soon change. GrapheneOS also is not interested with maximizing adoption above all else. They will not sacrifice privsec for the sake of broad device support.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:34:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972205</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972205</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972205</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>None of this is true, you seem to be making it up for the sake of attacking them. Google is often criticized and has been for years. That was never a bannable offense from the community chats. Nobody from GrapheneOS has ever doxxed anyone, for any reason. GrapheneOS has retained support from people in various security fields and that has only improved.<p>Alternatives to google pixels have been explored since the inception of the project. The only difference now is that an alternative is about to exist where one hasnt before. GrapheneOS was interested in paying an ODM directly before Motorola reached out. GrapheneOS has never been pixel-only for any other reason than limited options.<p>GrapheneOS has never suppressed criticism or brigaded on social media. What is often described as "criticism" is a thinly veiled excuse to attack the project. Real criticism has always been appreciated.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:32:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972186</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972186</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972186</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Motorola devices are the priority but they will support devices meeting the requirements. If pixels fall to do this, no support, but if they succeed, no reason to stop using them. Only time will tell.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:26:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972141</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972141</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972141</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They are not interested in shoveling corporate slop. They dont know why, and so, that is what they said. That is a commendable trait and google has many things to answer for. Being silent only serves to benefit google by concealing this behaviour further.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:25:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972130</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972130</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972130</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They had to, as many users were purchasing pixel 11 devices before support was announced. Announcing an unclear future is fine and transparency is appreciated. Simply ignoring the problem is not a solution.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:23:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972117</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972117</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972117</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Neither of these options would have been chosen. GrapheneOS could have continued supporting existing pixels and investigated options paying ODMs directly for devices that met the requirements. They were considering this option before Motorola reached out.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:21:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972109</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972109</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972109</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because google may have disabled it due to issues/errata. Google willing to enable it is a good sign it is fine, and at worst, affects stock OS as well. Google isnt answering GrapheneOS when they ask why it was disabled, so GrapheneOS cannot know if the implementation is acceptable or not.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:20:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972102</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972102</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972102</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes. That would remove the need to flash, which is a roadblock for many. Greenboot support and Auditor would ensure your install of GrapheneOS is genuine.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:15:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972073</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972073</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972073</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Pixel 11 doesn't yet meet the GrapheneOS security standards and may be skipped"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That was not the announcement. This was never stated anywhere. Motorola is making a subset of future devices meet the GrapheneOS hardware security requirements, greenboot and preinstalled options are not confirmed, and may not happen at all for the first few devices.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 23:14:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972063</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972063</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49972063</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "GrapheneOS has fixed the Android 17 QPR1 kernel performance regression"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>GrapheneOS is not interested in silencing themselves for the sake of greed and optics. Their image is built on explicitly not doing that.<p>You are making a false dichotomy, and suggesting they give into sanitized, corporate slop approaches rather than stick to their mission. GrapheneOS has gained the resources and relationships they have because they tell it like it is, not because they bend to the will of others out of fear.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:25:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946535</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946535</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946535</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "GrapheneOS has fixed the Android 17 QPR1 kernel performance regression"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>GrapheneOS has no relationship with Google.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:20:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946510</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946510</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946510</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "GrapheneOS has fixed the Android 17 QPR1 kernel performance regression"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>AOSP and its derivatives are linux distros.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:19:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946501</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946501</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946501</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "GrapheneOS has fixed the Android 17 QPR1 kernel performance regression"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Citation needed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:17:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946479</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946479</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946479</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "GrapheneOS has fixed the Android 17 QPR1 kernel performance regression"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Upstream is both very contribution unfriendly and their treatment of GrapheneOS leads GOS to not want to contribute anything to them anymore.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:17:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946478</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946478</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49946478</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "GrapheneOS' rewritten Messages app is released"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have no role in the project and that has been stated many times on social media.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 17:17:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49674636</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49674636</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49674636</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "Android NAT-T keepalive offload bypasses VPN lockdown"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Asking for support is not brigading. The vouch button exists for a reason.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 17:11:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49674569</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49674569</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49674569</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "GrapheneOS' rewritten Messages app is released"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah it is. Their infrastructure costs are super tiny, the biggest percent of funding goes to pay the dev team, and many are paid a wage comparable to where they live, they dont get inflated US software dev wages or anything.<p>Most of what they earn is public as a result of the donation method, like crypto. And most donors are completely anonymous.<p>GrapheneOS does not accept any funding with strings attached.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 04:41:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668889</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668889</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668889</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "GrapheneOS' rewritten Messages app is released"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>GrapheneOS makes 100% of their money off of donations, and have made quite a lot of it. The bottleneck is not funding, but finding talented developers to pay with that money.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 04:37:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668874</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668874</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49668874</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by HybridStatAnim8 in "GrapheneOS' rewritten Messages app is released"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The notification the Messaging app produces should have the option to copy the one time code directly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 01:42:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667803</link><dc:creator>HybridStatAnim8</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667803</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667803</guid></item></channel></rss>