For context, Spain is a full constitutional democracy, subject to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights, with a free(ish) press, independent judiciary, and regular elections — none of which Assemblea itself disputes, because it participates in all of them. The events OP is referencing (the 2017 independence referendum aftermath) were reviewed by European courts, and the outcomes were, shall we say, not quite the narrative Assemblea sells on its website.

If there are genuine, documented human rights concerns, I'd welcome impartial sources from the Supreme Court or the ECHR.

What I'd push back on is treating a political lobby's own press releases as neutral reporting. You should do better than that here, OP.

The simpler explanation is that they aren't doing that.

Telling people what should or shouldn't be done: that's fascism.

If there is disinformation, the solution is to counter it with actual information, to give the people better tools to identify it (like X's community notes), and to educate the general population so they will have better critical thinking.

Restricting freedom of speech is never a solution. How long until dissenting opinions are censored because somebody labels them "disinformation"? Who watches the watchmen? etc.

I'd rather live in a society with full freedom of speech and disinformation from State actors than have only 100% accurately vetted news.

If you get fired and your reaction is to go to your blog and whine about losing email access and not being able to deliver a talk that you had prepared for x time I, as a prospective employer, am going to draw some conclusions about your personality that won't help you get the job I'm offering.

The difference is quite easy to easy to spot.

It's a conscious decision based not on design, but on UX, as with the Magic Mouse USB port.

I cannot even render HN well.